Now the nightly build include all most boards under arm, mips, risc-v,
sim and x86, there is still some improvement need from community:
1.Some boards under arm, risc-v and sim still can't pass the build,
you can see the full list here(start with -):
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-
Hi, all:
NuttX nightly build is coming now:
https://builds.apache.org/job/NuttX-Nightly-Build/
Now it's a freestyle project CI job. It could switch to pipeline CI job
later which is more functional as Miguel has proposaled.
Nightly build job schedule settings as below:
a. Build Triggers:
The j
created, is stored
in a Jenkinsfile or in Groovy pipeline script, so the workflow can be
updated by a PR as in Github. Moreover, if using shared libraries, the
logic can reside in another repository, as Greg requested. I don't know if
that is possible with Github.
> So, I think we could c
After practise with Apache Jenkins CI and Github action CI for a time and
do some CI problems search in Apache maillist and google, let's sum up as
below:
Apache Jenkins
|Github a
Hi Haitao,
I will take a look.
By the way, do Apache Jenkins slave includes Docker? Or alternatively, does
Apache Jenkins have Docker Slave [1] plugin available?
If we could use either launch Docker containers in the slave or launch the
jobs in a Docker container we could use an image with all t
Thanks Xiang!
Another PR https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/4 since
Apache jenkins slave haven't gperf preinstalled,
so switch to use our owned prebuilt gperf. Xiang and Miguel please help to
review.
Or in another way, may I ask Justin Apache Infra team to apt-get install
gperf
I will merge it.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:50 PM Haitao Liu wrote:
>
> Hi, Greg,
> Thanks to Miguel's careful review, could you please help to finish the PR
> merge?
> Then I and Miguel can continue the development with more PRs and refinement.
>
> Gregory Nutt 于2020年1月31日周五 下午11:30写道：
>
> >
> >
Hi, Greg,
Thanks to Miguel's careful review, could you please help to finish the PR
merge?
Then I and Miguel can continue the development with more PRs and refinement.
Gregory Nutt 于2020年1月31日周五 下午11:30写道：
>
> > I have just added the CI scripts and testlist files in
> > https://github.com/apache
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 4:30 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> Perhaps Miguel could provide the review of PR3. I will be happy to
> finish the merge after some review is provided.
>
>
I can review the script, but maybe mostly generic (not too specific to
NuttX though).
> Once it has been merged, both
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 4:17 PM Haitao Liu wrote:
> Hi, Miguel,
>
> I have just added the CI scripts and testlist files in
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/3
> And asked XiaoXiang help to create Nuttx Nightly build job in
> builds.apache.org before. But it's just a freesty
I have just added the CI scripts and testlist files in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/3
And asked XiaoXiang help to create Nuttx Nightly build job in
builds.apache.org before. But it's just a freestyle CI job
which call cibuild.sh simply. Once CI script and testlist file
Hi, Miguel,
I have just added the CI scripts and testlist files in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/3
And asked XiaoXiang help to create Nuttx Nightly build job in
builds.apache.org before. But it's just a freestyle CI job
which call cibuild.sh simply. Once CI script and test
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:58 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
...
> You would need to submit an ICLA. The CCLA is for more for your employer
> benefit not ours.
Hi Justin, sorry for the delay in answering.
In that case there is no need to delay I guess. I have just sent the ICLA
and waiting for confirm
Hi,
> Thanks, good to know. I am asking my employer about including me in a
> corporate one (CCLA [1]), but if it is too much paperwork I guess I can
> just submit the ICLA.
You would need to submit an ICLA. The CCLA is for more for your employer
benefit not ours.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
after some research about new releases of Jenkins, it seems that my
proposal can be improved towards a simpler setup, so I modified it.
I have included some code as pull requests that could be useful to discuss
upon: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/2 and
https://github.
> We probably can get infra to add you, submitting an ICLA might help as
that could be used to create an account.
Thanks, good to know. I am asking my employer about including me in a
corporate one (CCLA [1]), but if it is too much paperwork I guess I can
just submit the ICLA. Let's see.
[1] http
Hi,
> Oh, I did check that wiki page but I was not aware that it was a
> requirement to be a comitter or PPMC member to have an LDAP account, but it
> makes sense, thanks anyway.
We probably can get infra to add you, submitting an ICLA might help as that
could be used to create an account.
Than
> I can give people Jenkin admin access but they need to be in LDAP. [1]
that means you need to be a committer or PPMC member.
Oh, I did check that wiki page but I was not aware that it was a
requirement to be a comitter or PPMC member to have an LDAP account, but it
makes sense, thanks anyway.
I
Hi,
> Also, a request: maybe it would be good to test if Jenkins in
> builds.apache.org support pipelines or any Jenkins plugin is missing, so if
> I could get the rights to access create a proof-of-concept pipeline to
> check everything is available.
I can give people Jenkin admin access but the
> You should have permission now.
Thanks Justin.
I have created a draft proposal (postfixing my name like the other one by
Brennan Ashton, in case others want to add another proposal from scratch,
but contributions are welcome):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Continuous+integr
Hi,
> so good you liked the idea. I tried to create the page in Confluence, but
> it seems I don't have enough rights.
You should have permission now.
Kind Regards,
Justin
Hi Justin and Haitao,
so good you liked the idea. I tried to create the page in Confluence, but
it seems I don't have enough rights.
Can someone else give me the needed rights to add it or create and give
edit permissions? My Confluence user in cwiki.apache.org is 'maht'
Cheers,
Miguel
On Fri,
Thanks Greg and Abdelatif. I am going to use the Pinguino toolchain at
first to let it work, and try the buildroot way later with free time.
Gregory Nutt 于2020年1月16日周四 下午10:26写道：
>
> > In addition, I notice http://www.nuttx.org/Documentation/NuttX.html say
> gnu
> > toolchains based on buildroo
Justin Mclean 于2020年1月17日周五 上午5:19写道：
> Hi,
>
> I think working on a CI document together it a great idea.
>
>
I also agree with Miguel's idea to working on a CI document. So save and
inspire more best practices in CI.
> - What architectures we want to include: all of them? (list them) some of
Hi,
I think working on a CI document together it a great idea.
> - What architectures we want to include: all of them? (list them) some of
> them can be deferred until "Perfect CI"? do Apache Jenkins have the machine
> for that architectures? if not ... are there emulators? and the toolchains?
>
TLDR: I think we need to make a "CI requirements and design" Draft Proposal
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Draft+Proposals)
---
Hi,
I think that in order to get a working CI as soon as possible we need to
please define a plan in a coordinated way.
I think "perfection" is the
In addition, I notice http://www.nuttx.org/Documentation/NuttX.html say gnu
toolchains based on buildroot
for many architectures.
There are configurations at
https://bitbucket.org/nuttx/buildroot/src/master/configs/ for:
avr-defconfig-4.3.3
avr-defconfig-4.5.2
I am not sure of the state o
Hi, Greg, may I ask where you find the right mips gcc toolchain?
I haven't found an official prebuilt mips gcc toolchain yet(mips.com
connect failed here). Or build it from source code.
I was talking with Abdelatif about this a few days ago. He is the
MIPS/PIC32 expert on the team. We are
Thanks very much, It really works after correct some mips-elf-gcc/ld etc
symlinks.
In addition, I notice http://www.nuttx.org/Documentation/NuttX.html say gnu
toolchains based on buildroot
for many architectures. So for AVR gcc toolchains, I just found
https://www.microchip.com/mplab/avr-support/av
Hi Haitao,
You can use this https://github.com/PinguinoIDE/pinguino-compilers
Even though it hasn't been updated for years, it does the job.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 1:46 PM Haitao Liu wrote:
>
> Hi, Greg, may I ask where you find the right mips gcc toolchain?
> I haven't found an official prebui
Hi, Greg, may I ask where you find the right mips gcc toolchain?
I haven't found an official prebuilt mips gcc toolchain yet(mips.com
connect failed here). Or build it from source code.
Gregory Nutt 于2020年1月9日周四 上午11:55写道：
>
> > Thanks, I think we can firstly get start in Linux and Windows. Then
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:12 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > One request: I checked the Jenkins and it seems that the job
> configuration
> > is not accessible without having an account, and you have to be a
> committer
> > and must be a member of the hudson-jobadmin group
>
> I can add peopl
Hi,
> One request: I checked the Jenkins and it seems that the job configuration
> is not accessible without having an account, and you have to be a committer
> and must be a member of the hudson-jobadmin group
I can add people to that as needed. I created jobs and given access o people in
the p
s a
reasonable approach.
And now prepare to use Apache
> Infra Jenkins CI firstly.
>
Yes, probably the best approach is to prepare CI jobs in a traditional way,
and once it is almost stable and you and people involved have less work
with it start to translating it to something versionabl
Thanks Miguel share your approach. We'll look into it, the aim for NuttX
is keep nuttx/ and apps/ user-end projects
clean and do not mess up with CI stuffs. And now prepare to use Apache
Infra Jenkins CI firstly.
Miguel Ángel Herranz 于2020年1月9日周四 下午7:45写道：
> Hi,
>
> I have conf
That's great nuttx-testing project is available. I think empty
nuttx-testing project is ok now.
We'll put the CI scripts and testing related stuff here later.
So sum up, in my opinion, there would be four CI jobs for NuttX projects:
1 One incubator-nuttx-website CI Job:
Once commit merged i
Haitao,
Would you like me to initialize the repository? I can do that for you
if you like with apps/ and nuttx/ as submodules but nothing else.
Greg
Haitao,
Cool! Anywhere in a public git repo is great; nuttx testing project also
sounds great.
cheers
adam
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 12:08 AM Haitao Liu wrote:
> In my opinion, Jenkins CI scripts could be version controlled firstly
> locally or my github.
> Once the whole process is f
Or https://github.com/NuttX/tools would be better to hold the jenkins CI
scripts in this period?
Let's please not use nuttx/tools. Let's not let any testing framework
develop inside of the RTOS.
I have created this for you
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing s
In my opinion, Jenkins CI scripts could be version controlled firstly
locally or my github.
Once the whole process is functional, I think the best place is to
put them
into nuttx testing project if available.
We need to request the creation of the NuttX testing repository. I
created the
In configure.sh, there are four wenv options for windows as below:
-c selects the Windows host and Cygwin (c) environment.
-u selects the Windows host and Ubuntu under Windows 10 (u) environment.
-g selects the Windows host and MinGW/MSYS environment.
-n selects the Windows
In my opinion, Jenkins CI scripts could be version controlled firstly
locally or my github.
Once the whole process is functional, I think the best place is to put them
into nuttx testing project if available.
We need to request the creation of the NuttX testing repository. I
created the new
Hi,
I have configured Jenkins CI pipelines in the past and aside the scripts
running in the jobs, managing the jobs definition in the UI can be a pain,
since is easy to apply untrackable changes that impact the pipeline.
So I am wondering if you are going to use any kind of solution like Jenkins
Or https://github.com/NuttX/tools would be better to hold the jenkins CI
scripts in this period?
Haitao Liu 于2020年1月9日周四 下午4:08写道：
> In my opinion, Jenkins CI scripts could be version controlled firstly
> locally or my github.
> Once the whole process is functional, I think the best pl
In my opinion, Jenkins CI scripts could be version controlled firstly
locally or my github.
Once the whole process is functional, I think the best place is to put them
into nuttx testing project if available.
Adam Feuer 于2020年1月9日周四 下午12:51写道：
> Haitao,
>
> Will the Jenkins CI script
Gregory Nutt 于2020年1月9日周四 上午11:55写道：
>
> > Thanks, I think we can firstly get start in Linux and Windows. Then
> > consider how to setup Mac later, donate slave or other.
> > Two other question, nuttx uses some cross compile toolchains etc. In
> > addition, Cygwin or MinGW is in need once nuttx b
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 7:55 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> I suspect you could substitute FreeBSD for macOS and also catch most if
> not all macOS build issues.
I think you could also require installing coreutils via brew or macports,
they both have it. On macOS I can't imagine trying to build NuttX
Haitao,
Will the Jenkins CI scripts live in version control somewhere?
cheers
adam
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 7:44 PM Haitao Liu wrote:
> Ok, get it. Thanks!
>
> Justin Mclean 于2020年1月9日周四 上午11:07写道：
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Thanks, I think we can firstly get
Thanks, I think we can firstly get start in Linux and Windows. Then
consider how to setup Mac later, donate slave or other.
Two other question, nuttx uses some cross compile toolchains etc. In
addition, Cygwin or MinGW is in need once nuttx built under Windows slaves.
Should we ask for Apache I
Ok, get it. Thanks!
Justin Mclean 于2020年1月9日周四 上午11:07写道：
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks, I think we can firstly get start in Linux and Windows. Then
> > consider how to setup Mac later, donate slave or other.
> > Two other question, nuttx uses some cross compile toolchains etc. In
> > addition, Cygwin or
Hi,
> Thanks, I think we can firstly get start in Linux and Windows. Then
> consider how to setup Mac later, donate slave or other.
> Two other question, nuttx uses some cross compile toolchains etc. In
> addition, Cygwin or MinGW is in need once nuttx built under Windows slaves.
> Should we ask f
Infra to help install in slave machines?
Justin Mclean 于2020年1月9日周四 上午10:14写道：
> Hi,
>
> > I have some questions about Apache Infra. Since NuttX would be built
> under
> > Linux/Mac/Windows environment, does Apache Infra Jenkins CI provides Mac
> > and Windows slav
Hi,
> I have some questions about Apache Infra. Since NuttX would be built under
> Linux/Mac/Windows environment, does Apache Infra Jenkins CI provides Mac
> and Windows slave machines to ease CI build?
There was a mac machine, but I think it was removed a while back. There are
windows
Hi, Justin,
I have some questions about Apache Infra. Since NuttX would be built under
Linux/Mac/Windows environment, does Apache Infra Jenkins CI provides Mac
and Windows slave machines to ease CI build?
Justin Mclean 于2020年1月8日周三 下午12:00写道：
> Hi,
>
> Changing subjects.
>
> >
gende geschreven:
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>> Since code check part is available now, could I and Duo prepare to
> > setup
> > >>> Jenkins CI job firstly?
> > >> Where are you intending to set up this job? Here [1] or elsewhere?
> > >
> > > Hopefully not in the end-user directories :-\
> > >
> > > Greg
> > >
> >
>>
> >>> Since code check part is available now, could I and Duo prepare to
> setup
> >>> Jenkins CI job firstly?
> >> Where are you intending to set up this job? Here [1] or elsewhere?
> >
> > Hopefully not in the end-user directories :-\
> >
> > Greg
> >
>
In my opionion, it's best setup job here in https://builds.apache.org
Justin Mclean 于2020年1月8日周三 下午12:00写道：
> Hi,
>
> Changing subjects.
>
> > Since code check part is available now, could I and Duo prepare to setup
> > Jenkins CI job firstly?
>
> Where a
Greg, all the CI specific scripts would only be in Jenkins Job Server. They
won't come into nuttx/ and apps/ end-user directories.
Gregory Nutt 于2020年1月8日周三 下午12:03写道：
> >> Since code check part is available now, could I and Duo prepare to setup
> >> Jenkins CI job fir
eft Gregory Nutt het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>
>>
>>> Since code check part is available now, could I and Duo prepare to setup
>>> Jenkins CI job firstly?
>> Where are you intending to set up this job? Here [1] or elsewhere?
>
> Hopefully not in the end-user directories :-\
>
> Greg
>
Since code check part is available now, could I and Duo prepare to setup
Jenkins CI job firstly?
Where are you intending to set up this job? Here [1] or elsewhere?
Hopefully not in the end-user directories :-\
Greg
Hi,
Changing subjects.
> Since code check part is available now, could I and Duo prepare to setup
> Jenkins CI job firstly?
Where are you intending to set up this job? Here [1] or elsewhere?
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://builds.apache.org
61 matches
Mail list logo
