The version in NuttX is based off an older version of SPIFFS (before all
of the security related changes) and may have incompatibilities with the
current SPIFFS.
do you remember which exact version of SPIFFS it was?
You will find all of that information in fs/spiffs/README.md
it seems like
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 8:08 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
>
> >> The version in NuttX is based off an older version of SPIFFS (before all
> >> of the security related changes) and may have incompatibilities with the
> >> current SPIFFS.
> > do you remember which exact version of SPIFFS it was?
> You w
The version in NuttX is based off an older version of SPIFFS (before all
of the security related changes) and may have incompatibilities with the
current SPIFFS.
do you remember which exact version of SPIFFS it was?
You will find all of that information in fs/spiffs/README.md
hi,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:11 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> The version in NuttX is based off an older version of SPIFFS (before all
> of the security related changes) and may have incompatibilities with the
> current SPIFFS.
do you remember which exact version of SPIFFS it was?
>
> On 12/20/2
Maybe it would be better to track upstream spiffs. I don't know
whether the
spiffs implementation in NuttX requires any changes from upstream but
if so
maybe they can be upstreamed as well.
Not compatible. The NuttX version was a major re-implementation with
major changes. The original w
Maybe it would be better to track upstream spiffs. I don't know whether the
spiffs implementation in NuttX requires any changes from upstream but if so
maybe they can be upstreamed as well.
Not compatible. The NuttX version was a major re-implementation with
major changes. The original worke
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:11 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> The version in NuttX is based off an older version of SPIFFS (before all
> of the security related changes) and may have incompatibilities with the
> current SPIFFS.
>
> On 12/20/2020 11:26 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > a questio
The version in NuttX is based off an older version of SPIFFS (before all
of the security related changes) and may have incompatibilities with the
current SPIFFS.
On 12/20/2020 11:26 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
hi,
a question: is the nuttx implementation of spiffs diverted intentionally from
o
It was also sent to secret...@apache.org
Thanks
Alin
-Original Message-
From: Xiang Xiao
Sent: den 21 december 2020 13:18
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: Submit SGA on behalf o Sony Corporation for donation of the source
files in Apache NuttX
Should we send SGA to secret...@apa
Should we send SGA to secret...@apache.org instead?
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:48 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis
wrote:
> Hi Alin,
>
> The attachment didn't come up, because this mailing list only accepts
> some kinds of documents: .txt, .jpg, etc, even .patch is not
> acceptable, I already asked the
Hi Alin,
The attachment didn't come up, because this mailing list only accepts
some kinds of documents: .txt, .jpg, etc, even .patch is not
acceptable, I already asked the Apache Infra to change it, but they
didn't help on this.
BR,
Alan
On 12/21/20, alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote:
> Hi Secretar
11 matches
Mail list logo
