Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-01 Thread Brett Porter
On 02/04/2011, at 7:08 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Brett will have to write for himself. From my point of view, either a > proper Codehaus / Apache notice (one that claims copyright for > Codehaus and then grants the license) or a BSD license would be fine. > However, Brett likely knows somethi

Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-01 Thread Benson Margulies
Jochen, I've worked with Larry some. I'm reasonably sure that he's fully tuned in. His point is that while these people may think that they've created a selective license, that such a thing has no legal substance (since it's all one jar) and so they have, effectively, dual-licensed it. --benson

Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-01 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > As far as I'm concerned, we can take the software under the most > liberal license available (AL 1.1) and ignore the GPL license entirely > for our purposes. If Larry's view is that using GPL'ed code in general is something then I am inc

Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-01 Thread Benson Margulies
I asked Larry Rosen for some *informal* legal advice. He's written a book on open source licensing and a legal advisor to the ASF: --- begin quote Cobertura's licensing model is nonsense. Distinguishing between "ant tasks" and "the rest of Cobertura" is meaningless to me. I suppose this is

Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-01 Thread Benson Margulies
Brett will have to write for himself. From my point of view, either a proper Codehaus / Apache notice (one that claims copyright for Codehaus and then grants the license) or a BSD license would be fine. However, Brett likely knows something that I don't. In both cases, my view is, following Larry

Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-01 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > @Brett So if we change the license to BSD, we can use every class as we'd > like to do? So no more reflection required? And does this require a vote? I'd be interested to learn why using a GPL'ed class in an BSD licensed class doesn't enfor

Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-01 Thread Benson Margulies
For what it's worth, I sent email to the cobertura dev list pointing out my view that their AL versus GPL grant language is ambiguous, and asking them to consider a statement of the form, "any open source build tool can call cobertura." I'll pass along any response that I get. Lacking that, of cou

RE: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-01 Thread Robert Scholte
Apart from the option to move it, I think codehaus is the most logic place to provide this plugin. The other one would be at cobertura self. This is where users will look first. I agree that with spending some time in this plugin it should be possible to solve those licensing problems. And if B

[mojo-dev] [jira] Created: (MTOMCAT-84) tomcat:reload logs the wrong message

2011-04-01 Thread Michael Osipov (JIRA)
tomcat:reload logs the wrong message Key: MTOMCAT-84 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MTOMCAT-84 Project: Maven 2.x Tomcat Plugin Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 1.1 Reporter: Michae

Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-01 Thread Benson Margulies
As I understand it, the original author of the patch went below the level of the ant tasks to the 'real' cobertura API. Robert opined that this was a Codehaus licensing problem. Brett opined that it was not. I opined that, if it was a problem, it made more sense to fork our of Codehaus than to writ

Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out

2011-04-01 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On 01/04/2011, at 6:53 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I just got bad news from Robert Scholte. There is a longstanding > problem of license friction with this plugin where the cobertura > license and the codehaus license don't play well together. The > original MCOBERTURA-65 patch already trangress

[mojo-dev] [jira] Updated: (MOJO-1657) Chornos not compatible with maven 3

2011-04-01 Thread Lucas POUZAC (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lucas POUZAC updated MOJO-1657: --- Attachment: test_chronos.tar Attached is an example. We need only change the versions of plugins in the pom

[mojo-dev] [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MOJO-1657) Chornos not compatible with maven 3

2011-04-01 Thread Lucas POUZAC (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=262218#action_262218 ] Lucas POUZAC edited comment on MOJO-1657 at 4/1/11 4:27 AM: Attached is an

[mojo-dev] [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MOJO-1657) Chornos not compatible with maven 3

2011-04-01 Thread Lucas POUZAC (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=262218#action_262218 ] Lucas POUZAC edited comment on MOJO-1657 at 4/1/11 4:27 AM: Attached is an

[mojo-dev] [jira] Commented: (MASPECTJ-94) could also filter aspects included in

2011-04-01 Thread nodje (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASPECTJ-94?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=262213#action_262213 ] nodje commented on MASPECTJ-94: --- I'll give a try to m-dependency-p asaic and will try to think about s

[mojo-dev] [jira] Assigned: (MOJO-1635) Ability to pass in some meta data about the build, eg build number, svn revision, etc

2011-04-01 Thread JIRA
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1635?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anders Sørensen reassigned MOJO-1635: - Assignee: Anders Sørensen (was: Kent Soelvsten) > Ability to pass in some meta data about the b

[mojo-dev] [jira] Closed: (MOJO-1637) Ability to draw graphs from additional CSVs specified

2011-04-01 Thread JIRA
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anders Sørensen closed MOJO-1637. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: chronos-maven-plugin-1.0 See MOJO-1636 > Ability to draw graphs

[mojo-dev] [jira] Assigned: (MOJO-1637) Ability to draw graphs from additional CSVs specified

2011-04-01 Thread JIRA
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anders Sørensen reassigned MOJO-1637: - Assignee: Anders Sørensen (was: Kent Soelvsten) > Ability to draw graphs from additional CSVs s