Re: Using term offsets for hit highlighting

Sorry for vanishing for so long, life unexpectedly caught up with me... I'm going to have some time to look at this again next week though, if you're interested in picking it up again. On 21 Mar 2012, at 09:02, Alan Woodward wrote: > That would be great, thanks! I had a go at me

Re: Using term offsets for hit highlighting

try to merge up the branch. I tell you this is going to > be messy and it might not compile but I will make it reasonable so you > can start. > > simon > > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Alan Woodward > wrote: >> Sorry for vanishing for so long, life unexpectedly caugh

Re: Using term offsets for hit highlighting

nches/LUCENE-2878 > the branch compiles but lots of nocommits / todos > > if you have questions please ask I will help as much as I can > > simon > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Alan Woodward > wrote: >> Hey, I reckon I can have a decent go at getting the branch

Re: Using term offsets for hit highlighting

to the > iterators if we need payloads or not. Same is true for offsets since > they are now in the index. I think it would be good if you could > tackle the payloads first and pass some info to the Scorer#positions() > method so we can pull the right thing. > > happy coding. >

Can't run SolrExampleTests from IntelliJ

he command line using 'ant test', which presumably means that it's somehow a classpath issue within IntelliJ. I've tried digging into the weeds of the SolrResourceLoader but haven't found anything useful so far. Anybody have any ideas? Thanks, Alan Woodward Int

Re: Can't run SolrExampleTests from IntelliJ

idea/lucene/analysis/phonetic/phonetic.iml index e986169..67c1670 100644 --- a/dev-tools/idea/lucene/analysis/phonetic/phonetic.iml +++ b/dev-tools/idea/lucene/analysis/phonetic/phonetic.iml @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ + On 19 Aug 2012, at 18:33, Alan Woodward wrote: &

Trivial javadoc correction for ChecksumIndexInput

Obviously overlooked when adapting from ChecksumIndexOutput. Patch inline, it didn't seem worth opening a JIRA for! Alan Woodward www.romseysoftware.co.uk diff --git a/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/ChecksumIndexInput.java b/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/

Re: SPI loading failures

Hi Yonik, You need the codecs module resources/ directory to be set up as a source directory in the IntelliJ project properties. - Alan On 8 Sep 2012, at 19:43, Yonik Seeley wrote: > I'm getting SPI failures running any test in IntelliJ: > > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: A SP

Using term offsets for hit highlighting

erm offsets in place of the scores. All pointers gratefully received! Thanks, Alan Woodward

Re: Using term offsets for hit highlighting

Cool, thanks Robert. I'll take a look at the JIRA ticket. On 19 Mar 2012, at 14:44, Robert Muir wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Alan Woodward > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The project I'm currently working on requires the reporting of exact hit &

Re: Using term offsets for hit highlighting

;>> >>>> Alan, you made my day! >>>> >>>> The branch is kind of outdated but I looked at it lately and I can >>>> certainly help >>>> to get it up to speed. The feature in that branch is quite a big one and >>>> its

Re: Using term offsets for hit highlighting

k and we > iterate from there? > > simon > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Erick Erickson > wrote: >> Yep, the first challenge is always getting the old patch(es) to apply. >> >> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Alan Woodward >> wrote: >>> Tha

SOLR example on trunk broken?

404 Not Found HTTP ERROR: 404 Problem accessing /solr/admin. Reason: Not Found Powered by Jetty:// I can't find anything in etc/jetty.xml that tells it how to load Solr either - possibly I'm just misunderstanding something here. Any ideas

Re: SOLR example on trunk broken?

Ah, yes, building it first would help, wouldn't it? :-/ Thanks Sami and Ryan. The new UI looks very nice, too! On 19 Apr 2012, at 17:44, Sami Siren wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Alan Woodward > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to get the Sol

Re: Javadoc links on wiki are broken

12, at 14:47, Robert Muir wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Alan Woodward > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> All Javadoc links on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins lead to 404 >> errors at the moment. Should I open a JIRA for wiki errors? >> > > I

Adding offsets to Spans and TermSpans

, and Spans.getSpans seems like the natural place to get them. The relevant patch is pretty tiny. I also have a patch to add offsets to MemoryIndex, from the same bit of development. Thanks, Alan Woodward

Re: Can't getLiveDocs in Solr Component from LUCENE-2878--positions branch

Hi Sean, From the javadocs on AtomicReader: /** Returns the {@link Bits} representing live (not * deleted) docs. A set bit indicates the doc ID has not * been deleted. If this method returns null it means * there are no deleted documents (all documents are * live). So I guess

Small error in IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException javadocs

The example code for IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException(E extends Exception, Closeable…) in its javadoc comment refers to closeSafely(), rather than closeWhileHandlingException(). Sufficiently trivial that I didn't think opening a JIRA was worth it… Alan Woodward

Updateable DocValues

how tricky would it be to implement, given the existing implementation? I'm guessing it would need to be done via Codecs. Thanks, Alan Woodward http://www.romseysoftware.co.uk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apac

Re: Updateable DocValues

Hi Simon, That sounds like a good place to start - I'll have a play with FieldNormUpdater and see if I can hack it into something basic that works, and then open a JIRA. Alan On 25 Jul 2012, at 15:03, Simon Willnauer wrote: > hey alan, > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:15 AM,

Re: Welcome Alan Woodward as Lucene/Solr committer

Thanks Robert. I'm a developer based in Cambridge, UK, and have been working on search engines for 10 years or so. Up until a couple of years ago I was mainly using closed-source implementations, and discovering lucene/solr was a breath of fresh air (you can see the code! you can fix bugs you

Re: svn commit: r1402337 - /lucene/dev/branches/LUCENE-2878/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/positions/IntervalFilter.java

Oops, thanks Simon! Wrong editor template… On 25 Oct 2012, at 22:29, sim...@apache.org wrote: > Author: simonw > Date: Thu Oct 25 21:29:21 2012 > New Revision: 1402337 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1402337&view=rev > Log: > fix license header > > Modified: > > lucene/dev/branch

Re: Source Control

We have an official git mirror for the project, though - git.apache.org/lucene-solr. So if people want to use git to collaborate, they can clone that repository and create branches there. I much prefer git to svn - I use staged adds, rebases and stashes all the time - but anyone can currently

Re: svn commit: r1403555 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/solr: ./ core/ core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/ core/src/test/org/apache/solr/core/ test-framework/src/java/org/apache/solr/

Mon Oct 29 22:13:03 2012 >> @@ -55,6 +55,10 @@ New Features >> * SOLR-3911: Make Directory and DirectoryFactory first class so that the >> majority >> of Solr's features work with any custom implementations. (Mark Miller) >>

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_07) - Build # 1370 - Still Failing!

I think these failures must be related to the metrics I added in SOLR-1972, which use static fields. I'm not sure why, though, as the objects involved should be pretty small. Is there a way of getting a more detailed breakdown of which classes/objects are using the memory? On 30 Oct 2012, at

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_07) - Build # 1370 - Still Failing!

tHandler handler; > > @BeforeClass > public static void beforeTests() throws Exception { > initCore("solrconfig.xml","schema.xml"); > handler = new UpdateRequestHandler(); > +inputFactory = XMLInputFactory.newInstance(); > } > + > + @Aft

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_07) - Build # 1376 - Failure!

I committed a fix for this. On 31 Oct 2012, at 02:36, Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/1376/ > Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_07 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC > > 2 tests failed. > FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.core.R

Re: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.lucene.search.Scorer.freq()

I got this a few days ago - running 'ant clean' before building cleared it up. On 2 Nov 2012, at 12:10, eksdev wrote: > debugQuery=true on on simple TermQuery (/trunk version from yesterday) throws > exception on explain() > It seams some of the scorers do not play nicely with explain()? > > ja

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.6.0_37) - Build # 1459 - Still Failing!

I committed a fix On 6 Nov 2012, at 07:28, Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/1459/ > Java: 32bit/jdk1.6.0_37 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC > > 2 tests failed. > FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.schema.Tes

Re: Commit-free ExternalFileField

Hi Mikhail, I would definitely be interested! Open a JIRA, and let's see what you've come up with :-) -Alan On 13 Nov 2012, at 18:48, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Community, > I have an implementation scratch of the subj (with great test coverage, btw), > but before attach it into jira for ages

Merge information in segment files

cache reloading is heavy - if we can restrict it to only reload after a merge, then we save a lot of wasted CPU and IO cycles. Thanks, Alan Woodward - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additiona

Re: Merge information in segment files

"change" (ie it's not > an API w/ back compat). > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Alan Woodward > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Is there any way of finding out if a segment is the result o

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 2995 - Failure!

Timing! Was just putting the kids to bed… The second one is a file separator fix, I think, but the first looks like I've forgotten to close the CoreContainer somewhere, so Windows can't delete the file. Will have a look. Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 2 Jul 2013, at 20:05,

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.7.0_25) - Build # 2995 - Failure!

I can't see anything obvious that I've forgotten to close. Is it possible to get the log output for the failing tests from Jenkins? Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 2 Jul 2013, at 21:01, Erick Erickson wrote: > Steve: > > The file separator thing is fixed (I hope, runs

Re: svn commit: r1499074 - /lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/core/TestCoreDiscovery.java

Thanks both! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 3 Jul 2013, at 02:47, Erick Erickson wrote: > Cool! thanks! > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > After svn up'ing trunk, TestCoreDiscovery.testDuplicateNames (and all other > tests in that suite) now

[ANN] Lucene/SOLR hackday in Cambridge, UK

p.com/Enterprise-Search-Cambridge-UK/events/127351142/. Places are limited, so please book early! Looking forward to seeing you there, Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk

Re: Additional timing/debug info

as it has a fairly fixed idea of how to report things via JMX which doesn't fit in with how Solr does things now. I do hope to get back to that soon, though. Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 11 Jul 2013, at 03:47, Walter Underwood wrote: > Sorry, I misunderstood your short response as

Publishing lucene forks

t, vast majority of code wasn't written by us. Does anyone on the list have an opinion as to what the Done Thing is here, or know if there are legal concerns? Thanks! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk

Re: svn commit: r1502468 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src: java/org/apache/solr/core/CorePropertiesLocator.java test/org/apache/solr/core/TestSolrXmlPersistor.java

en by CorePropertiesLocator on " + new Date()); - writer.close(); + p.store(os, "Written by CorePropertiesLocator on " + new Date()); } catch (IOException e) { Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 12 Jul 2013, at 09:35, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > you have tob e car

Re: Solr.xml parameters

> > > logging watcher threshold - No clue what this does. You can set this to, for example, 'WARN', to only record WARN-level or above log messages. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For addi

Re: Welcome Cassandra Targett as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Cassandra! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 31 Jul 2013, at 23:47, Robert Muir wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that Cassandra Targett has accepted to join our ranks > as a committer. > > Cassandra worked on the donation of the new Solr Reference Guide [1] and &g

Re: svn commit: r1419551 - /lucene/dev/trunk/solr/example/ivy.xml

Ha, cunning, been trying to work out how to dry up my ivy files for ages... On 10 Dec 2012, at 16:13, Uwe Schindler wrote: > Approved by the XML policeman :-) > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > >> -Origina

CC0 license compatibility

As part of a fix for SOLR-1972 I'm porting various bits of https://github.com/codahale/metrics into Solr. One of the classes, ThreadLocalRandom, is released under a CC0 license, with the following header: /* * Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166 * Expert Group and

Re: CC0 license compatibility

It's used in the statistics package for sampling. The Histogram class holds a pool of values for calculating means and variances from a stream of data, and uses the ThreadLocalRandom to determine whether or not a new value will be added to the pool. This is copied directly from the existing me

Re: CC0 license compatibility

That's what the sampling code does - it holds an AtomicLongArray of fixed length, and updates the values in there randomly. There's also an ExponentiallyDecayingSample which biases the collection of values towards more recent entries, for the 5-minute and 15-minute window averages. You can see

Re: CC0 license compatibility

e default (which you may want to > consider) then copy a random generator from commons math and voila, > should be fine? The updates are per-request, which could be pretty high, I suppose. I'll have a look at commons-math, anyway. Thanks! Alan Woodward a...@flax.co.uk --

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable javadoc check on Solr too

+1, this is an excellent idea, and I'm fully up for helping. There are a *lot* of missing docs, though - it might be worth making a branch first, just so that several people can hack on it before we let Jenkins loose. Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 17 Jan 2013, at 16:44, Tommaso Te

Re: Welcome back, Wolfgang Hoschek!

Welcome back! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 27 Sep 2013, at 05:58, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote: > Thanks to all! Looking forward to more contributions. > > Wolfgang. > > On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:21 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm pleased

Re: Welcome Joel Bernstein

Welcome, Joel! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 3 Oct 2013, at 06:24, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Hi, > > The Lucene PMC is happy to welcome Joel Bernstein as a committer on the > Lucene and Solr project. Joel has been working on a number of issues on the > project and we look

Re: Welcome Ryan Ernst as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Ryan! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 14 Oct 2013, at 18:27, Adrien Grand wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that Ryan Ernst has accepted to join our ranks > as a committer. > > Ryan has been working on a number of Lucene and Solr issues and > recently contributed

Re: svn commit: r1441483 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/solr: ./ core/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/ core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/ core/src/test-files/solr/collection1/conf/ core/src/test/org/apache/s

Hey Mark, did you mean to back out these CHANGES.TXT entries? Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 1 Feb 2013, at 15:29, markrmil...@apache.org wrote: > Author: markrmiller > Date: Fri Feb 1 15:29:08 2013 > New Revision: 1441483 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441483

Re: [VOTE] Lucene / Solr 4.6.0"

Yay! Congratulations, Uwe! On 15 Nov 2013, at 04:51, Shai Erera wrote: > Congratulations Uwe! > > Shai > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar > wrote: > Many congratulations Uwe! > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > The PMC Chair is going to

Re: svn commit: r1547452 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/solr: ./ core/src/test/org/apache/solr/cloud/ solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/common/cloud/

Hi Mark, I don't think you meant to remove the CHANGES entry for SOLR-5517 here? Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 3 Dec 2013, at 16:10, markrmil...@apache.org wrote: > Author: markrmiller > Date: Tue Dec 3 16:10:58 2013 > New Revision: 1547452 > > URL: http://svn.apach

Re: VOTE: solr no longer webapp

> The small scale is what embedded Solr can be used for. Could we merge the embedded server in SolrJ with the code in SolrDispatchFilter? Then we basically get the war version 'for free' - it's just a servlet wrapper around EmbeddedSolrServer. In fact, we should probably do this anyway. Ther

Re: ExternalDocValuesFilterReader progress?

ested in working on it, just need a project that would use it, and some time... Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 20 May 2013, at 16:29, Ryan McKinley wrote: > In march, there was so effort at looking at cleaner ways to integrate > external data: > > http://mail-archives.apache.or

Re: Welcome Han Jiang as a new Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome Han! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 8 Jun 2013, at 13:50, Dawid Weiss wrote: > Welcome Han! > > Dawid > > On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Michael McCandless > wrote: >> Welcome Han! >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccan

Re: Welcome David Smiley to the PMC

Congratulations, David (and Tomasso)! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 18 Mar 2013, at 16:12, Adrien Grand wrote: > Congratulations David! > > -- > Adrien > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: Welcome Shawn Heisey as Lucene/Solr committer

Welcome and congrats, Shawn! Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 19 Mar 2013, at 14:17, Michael McCandless wrote: > Welcome Shawn! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Steve Rowe wrote: >> I'm please

Opening up FieldCacheImpl

s? Or should I put up a JIRA to make it public? Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk

Re: Opening up FieldCacheImpl

like they ought to have a common API, really. And ValueSource in the function queries package as well. But that's another issue... Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 22 Mar 2013, at 20:48, Yonik Seeley wrote: > The ability to cache stuff w/o resorting to weak references would be even

Re: Opening up FieldCacheImpl

> I think instead FieldCache should actually be completely package > private and hidden behind a UninvertingFilterReader and accessible via > the existing AtomicReader docValues methods. Aha, right, because SegmentCoreReaders already caches XXXDocValues instances (without using WeakReferences or

Re: Opening up FieldCacheImpl

I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4883 as a start. Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 26 Mar 2013, at 00:51, Robert Muir wrote: > I don't think codec would be where you'd plugin for a filterreader that > exposes external data as fake fields. That&#x

Re: Opening up FieldCacheImpl

could work as a replacement for ExternalFileField with appropriate factories - I'll open a JIRA and put up a patch once it does anything useful. Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 26 Mar 2013, at 10:02, Alan Woodward wrote: > I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4883 as

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.6.0_45) - Build # 5414 - Still Failing!

Could be to do with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4616? Don't have time to check right now, but will have a look later on... On 3 May 2013, at 14:51, Uwe Schindler wrote: >> FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.SolrInfoMBeanTest

Re: Welcome Tomoko Uchida as Lucene/Solr committer

Congratulations and welcome! > On 10 Apr 2019, at 14:21, Gus Heck > wrote: > > Welcome Tomoko! :) > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:57 PM Ahmet Arslan > wrote: > Congralations Tomoko! > > > > > On Tuesday, April 9, 2019, 8:48:03 PM GM

Re: Now that 8.10 is out ... let's get rolling on 9!

+1 to start pushing for a 9.0 release. There isn’t an 8.10 version constant in the 9.0 branch at the moment - are there some release tasks that have been missed? > On 29 Sep 2021, at 17:58, Timothy Potter wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > Having just finished up the 8.10 release, it feels like this is

Re: Welcome Michael Gibney as Lucene committer

Congratulations and welcome, Michael! > On 6 Oct 2021, at 14:33, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > Hello everyone! > > Please welcome Michael Gibney as the latest Lucene committer. Michael > - it's a tradition for you to introduce yourself, even if we've been > seeing you for quite a while! :) > > Dawid

Re: Slow DV equivalent of TermInSetQuery

We have SortedSetDocValuesField.newSlowRangeQuery() which does something close to what you want here, I think. > On 26 Oct 2021, at 15:23, Michael McCandless > wrote: > > Hi Team, > > I was discussing this problem with Greg Miller (also at Amazon Product > Se

Warnings from gradle rat task

Hi all, When running `./gradlew check` against the latest master I get a whole bunch of output messages like this: > Task :lucene:analysis:smartcn:rat Trying to override old definition of task javadoc > Task :lucene:analysis:stempel:rat Trying to override old definition of task javadoc > Task

Re: Welcome Julie Tibshirani to the Lucene PMC

Congratulations and welcome! - Alan > On 30 Nov 2021, at 21:49, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce that Julie Tibshirani has accepted an invitation to > join the Lucene PMC! > > Congratulations Julie, and welcome aboard! > > -- > Adrien ---

Re: gradlew check failure

Hey Joel, The fix for this is to delete the gradle.properties file in the root directory and stop any daemons before running gradle check again. The build will regenerate the gradle.properties file with some module exports that work around this problem in the formatter. - A > On 24 Jan 2022,

Re: gradlew check failure

AIUI no, it’s a problem when loading gradle’s JVM, but Dawid might have a better idea? > On 24 Jan 2022, at 13:50, Mike Drob wrote: > > Is there a way to check for these missing module exports early and fail with > a more informative message? > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 7:4

Re: Welcome Guo Feng as Lucene committer

Congratulations and Welcome! > On 25 Jan 2022, at 09:09, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce that Guo Feng has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer. > > Feng, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a > brief bio. > > Congratulations and welc

Re: Monitor enhancements

These sound like nice improvements to me! I don’t know that anyone is actively working on Monitor stuff at the moment so please feel free open PRs or create patches. > On 11 Feb 2022, at 08:41, Niko Usai wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm working on a project where I use very heavily Lucene Monitor p

Lucene 9.2 release

Hi all, It’s been six weeks or so since we released 9.1, and we have a bunch of nice new features and enhancements piling up in the 9.x branch. I’d like to volunteer to be a release manager for a 9.2 release. I propose to cut a branch this time next week, 10th May. - Alan ---

Re: XML retrieval with Intervals

I *think* it would be possible to write an IntervalsSource implementation that took opening and closing tags, and did the right thing here - as you say, a standard `contains` will try and minimise things, but you could write something that attempted to match an opening tag with its corresponding

Re: Lucene 9.2 release

with it (if it gains basic agreement among committers). > > Tomoko > > > 2022年5月4日(水) 2:26 Ignacio Vera mailto:iver...@gmail.com>>: > +1 > > Thanks Alan! > > > On 3. May 2022, at 13:01, Alan Woodward > <mailto:romseyg...@gmail.com>> wrote: &

Re: Lucene 9.2 release

ontribution workflow more GitHub-oriented and there > is a related issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10543>, an announcement could > be helpful to proceed with it (if it gains basic agreement among committers). &

New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.2.0

NOTICE: Branch branch_9_2 has been cut and versions updated to 9.3 on stable branch. Please observe the normal rules: * No new features may be committed to the branch. * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be committed to the branch. However, you should submit all patc

Re: Lucene 9.2 release

It was part of the release process, which runs with Java 11. It should be fixed now. > Newer java versions won't make a broken link, you just won't have a link at > all. This seems a bit of a shame, as some of the problems were genuine API bugs - public methods with package-private parameter

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.2.0

/www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > >> -Original Message- >> From: Alan Woodward >> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 3:59 PM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.2.0 >> >> NOTICE: >>

Re: Lucene 9.2 release

$ /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java -version openjdk version "11" 2018-09-25 OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11+28) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11+28, mixed mode) > On 18 May 2022, at 09:35, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > Alan, what's the exact JDK ve

Re: Lucene 9.2 release

I think this release is the first time I’ve used Java 11 since 2019, yes! I’ll get the latest AdoptOpenJDK version and try and persuade my Mac to use it... > On 18 May 2022, at 10:19, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > Living in the past, aren't we? :) > > D. > > On Wed, May

[VOTE] Release Lucene 9.2.0 RC1

Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.2.0-RC1-rev-978eef5459c7683038ddcca4ec56e4baa63715d0 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRe

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Lucene 9.2.0 RC1

Julie Tibshirani <mailto:juliet...@gmail.com>> wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:57:28.654665] > > Thanks Alan! > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 1:51 PM Anshum Gupta <mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net>> wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [0:59:19.002348] > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at

[VOTE] Release Lucene 9.2.0 RC2

Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.2.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.2.0-RC2-rev-ba8c3a806ada3d7b3c34d408e449a92376a8481b You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRe

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.2.0 RC2

It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is: +1 10 (8 binding) 0 0 -1 0 This vote has PASSED Thanks to everyone who voted! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional command

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 9.2.0 released

23 May 2022 - Apache Lucene™ 9.2.0 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 9.2.0. Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured search engine library written entirely in Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that requires structu

Re: Finding out which fields matched the query

The Matches API will give you this information - it’s still likely to be fairly slow, but it’s a lot easier to use than trying to parse Explain output. Query q = ….; Weight w = searcher.createWeight(searcher.rewrite(query), ScoreMode.COMPLETE_NO_SCORES, 1.0f); Matches m = w.matches(context, doc

Re: Finding out which fields matched the query

e.search.QueryVisitor) > > <https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_2_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/Query.html#visit(org.apache.lucene.search.QueryVisitor)> > > I'd go with the Matches API though. > > Dawid > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 10:48 AM Alan Woodward <ma

Re: Finding out which fields matched the query

.org/core/9_2_0/highlighter/org/apache/lucene/search/matchhighlight/package-summary.html> > > Dawid > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 1:10 PM Alan Woodward <mailto:romseyg...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Your approach is almost certainly more efficient, but it might gi

Re: Lucene 9.3.0 release

+1, thanks Ignacio > On 11 Jul 2022, at 15:02, Ignacio Vera > wrote: > > Hello! > > Lucene 9.2.0 was released around 2 months ago and we are accumulating > a good > bunch of new features, optimizati

Re: Welcome Vigya Sharma as Lucene committer

Congratulations and welcome, Vigya! - Alan > On 28 Jul 2022, at 20:44, Vigya Sharma > wrote: > > Thanks everyone for the warm welcome. It is an honor to be invited as a > Lucene committer, and I look forward to contributing more to the community. > > A little bit

Re: Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.4.0

Hi Mike, I’ve opened https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11760 as a small bug fix PR for a problem with interval queries. Am I OK to port this to the 9.4 branch? Thanks, Alan > On 2 Sep 2022, at 20:42, Michael Sokolov

Re: Subject: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene 9.4.0

Done. Thanks! > On 9 Sep 2022, at 16:32, Michael Sokolov wrote: > > Hi Alan - I checked out the interval queries patch; seems pretty safe, > please go ahead and port to 9.4. Thanks! > > Mike > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 10:41 AM Alan Woodward wrote: >> >&g

Re: Welcome Luca Cavanna as Lucene committer

Congratulations Luca! > On 5 Oct 2022, at 18:03, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce that Luca Cavanna has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer. > > Luca, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a > brief bio. > > Congratulations and welcome!

Re: Lucene 9.5.0 release

+1, thanks Luca! > On 13 Jan 2023, at 09:54, Luca Cavanna > wrote: > > Hi all, > I'd like to propose that we release Lucene 9.5.0. There is a decent amount of > changes that would go into it looking at the github milestone: > https://github.com/apache/lucene/milesto

Re: Welcome Ben Trent as Lucene committer

Congratulations Ben! > On 27 Jan 2023, at 15:18, Adrien Grand wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce that Ben Trent has accepted the PMC's > invitation to become a committer. > > Ben, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a > brief bio. > > Congratulations and welcome! >

Re: Change score with distance SortField

Unfortunately this wouldn’t have worked in earlier versions of lucene where you could pass a SortField to the bindings API either, as that only understood certain types of sort - part of the reason we removed it in favour of the more explicit DoubleValuesSource API. You have a few options here:

Lucene 9.6 release

Hi all, It’s been a while since our last release, and we have a number of nice improvements and optimisations sitting in the 9x branch. I propose that we start the process for a 9.6 release, and I will volunteer to be the release manager. If there are no objections, I will cut a release branc

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >