Actually this would be really nice, wouldn't it. Add a getFieldCache(String field) method to AtomicReader. You'd have to be able to determine what to return depending on the field though - uninverted field, or docvalues, or another cached source.
FieldCache and DocValues seem like they ought to have a common API, really. And ValueSource in the function queries package as well. But that's another issue... Alan Woodward www.flax.co.uk On 22 Mar 2013, at 20:48, Yonik Seeley wrote: > The ability to cache stuff w/o resorting to weak references would be even > nicer! > Caches right on the segment readers? > > -Yonik > http://lucidworks.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >
