Re: Proposing a Lucene 9.12.3

Thank you everyone! +1 for a rare N-2 bugfix release. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 8:38 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > all fine. It was already backported by Chris. I haven't seen the message, > sorry! > > Uwe > Am 14.09.2025 um 15:33 schrieb Uwe

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.3.0 RC2

+1 to release RC2 Smoke tester on nightly benchy box (beast3) was happy: SUCCESS! [0:33:08.766406] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 5:24 AM Simon Cooper wrote:

Re: Proposing a 10.3 release in September

an alt impl. >>><https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15116> for GroupVInt >>>optimization. Is this a blocker for 10.3? >>> >>> I don't see any issues/PRs with the "blocker" label yet, but will keep >>> an eye out. >>&

Re: Integer.MAX_VALUE sentinel never checked?

Wow, I think we finally found evidence of time travel! And Doug has somehow also found a way to live forever! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 12:27 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Some message from the future? 3203/12/01 or does it come from the far > pa

Re: Proposing a 10.3 release in September

4:57 AM Eric Pugh < >> ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: >> >>> That is a great reason to do the release! I can see us all saying >>> “hooray” as he clicks the final button! >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 7:19 AM Michael Sokolov >>&

Re: Proposing a 10.3 release in September

+1 for 10.3 release. Note that Community over Code NA is Sep 11 - Sep 14 in Minneapolis so some of us might be less responsive ... but I don't think that's a reason to alter the plan (hmm, except I think Vigya is attending the conference heh). Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On

Re: Welcome Ge Song as Lucene committer

Welcome and thank you for all your fun Lucene development! Once you figure out how to make coffee, please teach the rest of us. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 5:38 AM Luca Cavanna wrote: > Congratulations and welcome!!! > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 11:2

Welcome Vigya Sharma to the Lucene PMC

Hello Lucene developers, I'm happy to announce that Vigya Sharma has accepted an invitation to join the Lucene Project Management Committee (PMC)! Vigya's engagement in the Lucene community in the three years since he joined as committer has been impactful -- attending and presenting talks at Com

Re: Welcome Simon Cooper as Lucene committer

Welcome! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 7:18 AM Alan Woodward wrote: > Congratulations and welcome! We need to start a Cambridge committers > group :) > > - Alan > > > On 20 Jun 2025, at 08:06, Dawid Weiss wrote: > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I'

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:26:24.234476] Thank you Chris! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 7:50 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.2.2 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/luce

Re: Lucene Projects for the Open Source Software Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon

[Adding Stephen back on the "To:" line (not sure if he's sub'd to Lucene dev list).] Stephen, it looks like we have a nice collection of possible projects in the Google Doc ( https://docs.google.com/document/d/10luAXYfHDe3j_pF9dslPdDzDMHaUqMTmnPI6QEgUP4w/edit?usp=drivesdk) and a number of mentors

Welcome Stefan Vodita to the Lucene PMC

Hello Lucene developers, I'm happy to announce that Stefan Vodita has accepted an invitation to join the Lucene Project Management Committee (PMC)! The PMC is the next step after committership in the meritocracy for each Apache Software Foundation project, and happens when a person shows continue

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.1 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:27:04.783002] Thanks Chris! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 4:59 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 10.2.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:28:39.446953] (But I still think a respin with the IoDVQ fix is warranted). Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 12:07 PM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 10.2.1 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.1 RC1

> For reference, Ben also flagged this one as a candidate for 10.2.1: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14543. I'm undecided on including it. On the one hand, it's been introduced in 10.0.0, on the other hand it causes trouble with things like IndexOrDocValuesQuery, which no longer make their d

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.2.0 RC1

+1 Thanks Ignacio! SUCCESS! [0:23:44.874191] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 11:34 AM Robert Muir wrote: > +1 > > I defanged my smoketester a bit and removed the -Dtests.nightly to > workaround the test issue, since I want to avoid repartitioning space

Re: Welcome Michael Froh as Lucene committer

Welcome to another Michael! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 7:26 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Welcome, Michael! > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 12:52 PM Stefan Vodita > wrote: > >> Well done! Welcome, Michael! >> >> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 08:07, Dawid Weiss w

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.1 RC1

+1: SUCCESS! [0:19:49.123227] Thank you Chris! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 9:31 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > SUCCESS! [1:13:18.039623] > > +1 > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 9:46 PM Benjamin Trent > wrote: > > > > SUCCESS! [0:55:27.954415] > > > > +1 > > >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-10.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-23) - Build # 382 - Unstable!

OK Adrien fixed this (thanks!!) with https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13979 Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 2:39 PM Michael McCandless wrote: > Hmm I thought https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13376 fixed this? > Did we maybe break gro

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-10.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-23) - Build # 382 - Unstable!

Hmm I thought https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13376 fixed this? Did we maybe break groupVInt overflow with the switch of postings APIs from long[] to int[] (#13968)? The failure repros for me ("../../gradlew test --tests TestPostingsUtil.testIntegerOverflow -Dtests.seed=FB4A133DBEE558B8 -Dt

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 18991 - Still Failing!

I think we need Uwe to turn this off -- 9.x is now just a tombstone. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:01 PM Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-9.x-Linux/18991/ > Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.1) - Build # 50504 - Failure!

Hmm: java.lang.VirtualMachineError: Out of space in CodeCache for adapters Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:32 AM Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-main-Linux/50504/ > Java: 64bit/h

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-MacOSX (64bit/hotspot/jdk-17.0.9) - Build # 4409 - Failure!

ucene/job/Lucene-NightlyTests-9.x/1014/console >> . >> >> I think I meant to remove those jobs when I created the new ones for 10x, >> but I must have forgotten. Going to take care of it now. >> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 12:46 PM Michael McCandless < >> luc..

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC4

+1 SUCCESS! [0:18:16.706133] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 1:26 AM Luca Cavanna wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 10.0.0 > > I published a draft of the release notes at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-MacOSX (64bit/hotspot/jdk-17.0.9) - Build # 4409 - Failure!

This build timed out ... but how is it even able to run? We had deleted branch_9x... (soon to be restored with only a tombstone). Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 3:17 PM Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-9.x-

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC3

OK I cherry-pick'd to 10.0.x and 10.x ... I think release is unblocked again! Sorry about all of this ... I'll watch CI builds for any issues. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 4:43 PM Michael McCandless wrote: > OK the 9.12.x PR is merged

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC3

OK the 9.12.x PR is merged ... I'll next cherry-pick to 10.0.x and 10.x. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:36 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Thanks Luca, I'm still actively working on the back compat brea

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC3

ithub.com/apache/lucene/pull/13825 >>> >>> This change affects the API of DataInput, which is an important core >>> interface, but it does have a strong rationale for people who use these >>> classes directly in downstream libraries. >>> >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC3

Hello, Alas, I fear this issue is likely a (late breaking!) blocker for 10.0.0? https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13867 I (sadly) broke back compat in 9.12.0 when trying to open 9.11.x written indices using HNSW scalar quantization at defaults. I have not tested but I strongly expect

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC3

+1 SUCCESS! [0:22:54.616680] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 7:07 PM Nhat Nguyen wrote: > SUCCESS! [1:30:00.371232] > > +1 > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 1:30 PM Chris Hegarty > wrote: > >> >> SUCCESS! [1:10:30.653744] >> >> +1 >> >> -Chris. >> >> >> > On 5

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:37:28.511639] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 3:44 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > +1 > SUCCESS! [1:46:57.466093] > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 11:43 AM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > >> um, +1 >> >> On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 10:39 AM Michael Sok

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 10.0.0 RC1

Hi Team, I'm worried about https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13844 -- a hang during HNSW indexing, uncovered in nightly benchy. I'm seeing if the hang reproduces ... but it might be a blocker for 10.0.0 release if it's real / repros? Then again, it must be quite rare ... Mike McCandless

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.0 RC2

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 12:51 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > > >> Mike's laptop is more than 2x faster than mine?!?!? Dang, do I need an >> upgrade? > > > Mike lives in the future and only occasionally drops by to the present. > His computers are also from the future. It's always been like this - you >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.0 RC2

+1 to release: SUCCESS! [0:19:16.468055] Thanks Chris! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 9:57 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.12.0 > > This build includes the bwc stuff with 8.11.4. > > The artifacts can be down

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.12.0 RC1

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 7:01 AM Chris Hegarty < christopher.hega...@elastic.co> wrote: > +1 for release, unless the uncovered issue with TieredMergePolicy causes > malfunction. > > My analysis concludes that there is no product bug here. Yeah, maybe the > policy could be a little more aggressive i

Re: Lucene 10.0 and 9.12 blockers

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 9:52 AM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: I'm not clear if someone is actively looking into the recall issues with >> 8-bit quantization <https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13519>? >> > > If nobody jumps on this

Re: Lucene 10.0 and 9.12 blockers

Thanks for driving this release process Adrien, and everyone for helping to resolve the blockers! More comments below: On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 1:45 PM Adrien Grand wrote: I just reviewed the humongous PR that migrates more classes to records > , it lo

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-MMAPv2-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.1) - Build # 1517 - Unstable!

I opened https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13720 Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 9:00 AM Michael McCandless wrote: > This reproduces for me, on Linux and current main. I'll open an issue ... > looks likely to be a floating point ulp i

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-MMAPv2-Windows (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.1) - Build # 1517 - Unstable!

This reproduces for me, on Linux and current main. I'll open an issue ... looks likely to be a floating point ulp issue, wrong/different order of operations or so. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 12:07 AM Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wro

Re: Lucene 10.0 and 9.12 blockers

On Sat, Aug 31, 2024 at 2:00 PM Shubham Chaudhary wrote: > Hi, regarding the 10.0 release, should we also consider > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13328. It was planned for 10.0 ( > https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13207) and is waiting on review, > so I think it'll be good if we c

Re: Lucene 10.0 and 9.12 blockers

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 5:15 AM Luca Cavanna wrote: > For Lucene 10.0, I have two topics to raise: > > 1. Remove the deprecated IndexSearcher#search(Query, Collector) in favour > of IndexSearcher#search(Query, CollectorManager) ( > https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/12892): this involves re

Re: gradle build gives spurious warnings about unferenced license files?

I opened https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13695 to try to get to the bottom of this. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 4:29 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > When I run "gradle check"

Re: Lucene 10.0 and 9.12 blockers

I think maybe also https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13519 should be a blocker? It looks like 8 bit vector HNSW quantization is broken (unless I'm making a silly mistake with luceneutil tooling). I've also set its milestone to 10.0.0. Do we really not have a way to mark an issue a blocker

gradle build gives spurious warnings about unferenced license files?

Hi Team, When I run "gradle check" on main, sometimes I get seemingly false positive warnings about dozens of unferenced license files, like this: WARNING: there were unreferenced files under license folder: - /s1/l/trunk/lucene/licenses/antlr4-runtime-LICENSE-BSD.txt - /s1/l/trunk/lucene/lic

Re: Branchless binary search in Java?

n a block > faster. > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 5:31 PM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> Oh I realized this super interesting read (thanks Rob!) was accidentally >> sent privately to me, so I'm reply-all'ing explicitly s

Re: Welcome Armin Braun as Lucene comitter

Welcome Armin! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 5:10 AM Luca Cavanna wrote: > I'm pleased to announce that Armin Braun has accepted the PMC's invitation > to become a Lucene committer. > > Armin, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves w

Re: Lucene Cyborg

Thanks for sharing Adrien, this is really cool! It's neat that the relative gains of Java vs C are quite a bit less than they were ~11 years ago when I played with a much smaller subset of queries. Also, COUNT on disjunction queries with Lucene Cyborg got slower. What a feat, to port so much of

Re: Supporting more than 2 versions of indexes

Increasing the scope/duration of backwards compatibility index support across the board adds a big taxation and risk on ongoing development. It's hard enough just supporting N-1 major release written indices. Or are we talking about the "best effort" (e.g. sandbox Codecs) that I think Simon pursu

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.11.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:19:43.387183] Thank you for RMing Ignacio! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:29 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.11.1 > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repo

Re: Lucene 10

Thanks Adrien. Longish term planning in open source is such a hard thing so I'm glad you are helping to herd us cats ;) I've also finally switched our nightly benchmarks to use concurrent search (intra-query concurrency)! It's annotation GM in the charts. Some queries got faster, like BooleanQu

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.11.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:24:55.332837] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 11:21 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [1:09:30.262027] > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 4:15 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:12:30.029470] >>

Re: Lucene 9.11

Thanks Ben! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:45 AM Stefan Vodita wrote: > Ben, I just merged #13414 , > so it's not a blocker for the release. > Thanks again for volunteering to be release manager! > > Stefa

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-NightlyTests-main - Build # 1315 - Still Unstable!

Hmm this failure looks not great. I tried the "Reproduce with:" for one of the failures (see below) but it fails to run any tests at all? Maybe because of the cool parameterized testing we now have for our back compat tests? If I remove the "{...}" pattern then the failures do repro. ./gradlew

Re: Query about the GitHub statistics for Lucene

On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 4:41 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: Seems that I’ve fallen into the newbie PMC Chair rabbit hole! ;-) - the > reporting tool has long standing issues. Maybe they’re fixable, maybe not, > but it’s possible we don’t necessarily need it now. > Sorry :) Seems to be a rite-of-passage

Re: Query about the GitHub statistics for Lucene

(regexp?) bug! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 1:03 PM Michael McCandless wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 4:49 AM Chris Hegarty < > christopher.hega...@elastic.co> wrote: > > In preparation for the project’s upcoming ASF board report,

Re: Query about the GitHub statistics for Lucene

On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 4:49 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: In preparation for the project’s upcoming ASF board report, I came across > and reported [1] an issue with the GH statistics, available at: > https://reporter.apache.org/wizard/statistics?lucene > > It appears that there is no GH activity for 20

Re: Announcing githubsearch!

21 Feb 2024, 22:02 Anshum Gupta, wrote: > >> > >> This is great! Like always, thank you Mike! > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 8:40 AM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Team, >

Re: [Vote] Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

+1, exciting! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 6:24 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > Since the discussion on bumping the Lucene main branch to Java 21 is > winding down, let's hold a vote on this important change. > > Once bumped, the next major release

Re: Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 7:41 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > So I think this means we are now free to use all the newfangled language > features since Java 11 (min required for Lucene 9.x) -> Java 21? > > For the _main_ branch, yes. > > The _branch_9x_ remains unchanged - it stays on Java 11. > > So, i

Re: Bump the Lucene main branch to Java 21

Thank you for the heads up Chris. So I think this means we are now free to use all the newfangled language features since Java 11 (min required for Lucene 9.x) -> Java 21? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 3:58 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > > A number o

Re: Welcome Zhang Chao as Lucene committer

Welcome Chao! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 5:02 AM Stefan Vodita wrote: > Congratulations, Chao! > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 17:28, Adrien Grand wrote: > >> I'm pleased to announce that Zhang Chao has accepted the PMC's >> invitation to become a commi

Re: Announcing githubsearch!

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:06 AM Stefan Vodita wrote: Thank you Mike, I really like all the facets! > Me too lol. It was one of the big motivators for me to build this out. GitHub's search didn't have all the facet drill-downs/up/sideways I wanted. Some of them are super useful like "which PRs

Re: Announcing githubsearch!

you Mike for developing and hosting these services! > > Julie > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 9:40 AM Michael Wechner > wrote: > >> thank you very much! >> >> Am 19.02.24 um 17:39 schrieb Michael McCandless: >> >> Hi Team, >> >> ~1.5 years ago (

Re: Announcing githubsearch!

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 1:00 PM Walter Underwood wrote: It appears to always search prefixes, so there is no way to search for > “wunder” without getting “wundermap” and “wunderground”. Putting the term > in quotes doesn’t turn that off. > Hmm that shouldn't be the case? It does split on camel

Re: Announcing githubsearch!

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:01 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: I love the gray all text UI. Don't change it! But I wonder if it's time for > a favicon? > LOL favicon! You do NOT want to have to confront my artistic skills! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com >

Announcing githubsearch!

Hi Team, ~1.5 years ago (August 2022) we migrated our Lucene issue tracking from Jira to GitHub. Thank you Tomoko for all the hard work doing such a complex, multi-phased, high-fidelity migration! I finally finished also migrating jirasearch to GitHub: githubsearch.mikemccandless.com. It was tric

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.10.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:19:57.370204] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 6:26 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:14:49.683559] > > -Chris. > > > On 15 Feb 2024, at 21:08, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I used Stefan Vodita's Hack to make the Smoket

Re: Lucene 9.10

+1 to release 9.10. Thank you for volunteering Adrien! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 9:57 AM Adrien Grand wrote: > Hello all, > > It's been 2 months since we released 9.9 and we accumulated a good number > of changes, so I'd like to propose that we rel

Re: Needs help reviewing on Lucene PostingsFormat memory improvement

Hi Anh Dũng Bùi, Thank you for tackling these and being so gently patient/persisting! Sorry for the delay. I will try to review them soon. The off-heap (streaming?) building of FSTs is really a massive improvement to Lucene, inspired by Tantivy's FST implementation: https://blog.burntsushi.net/

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.2 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:18:29.298410] Thank you Chris! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 6:57 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.9.2 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucen

Welcome Stefan Vodita as Lucene committter

Hi Team, I'm pleased to announce that Stefan Vodita has accepted the Lucene PMC's invitation to become a committer! Stefan, the tradition is that new committers introduce themselves with a brief bio. Congratulations, welcome, and thank you for all your improvements to Lucene and our community,

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-21.0.1) - Build # 46049 - Unstable!

Hmm this is an interesting failure ... one of the hits scores is off by a wee bit (one ULP?). Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 7:33 AM Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-main-Linux/46049/ > Java: 64bit/hotspot/j

Heads up: upcoming GitHub action to mark stale Lucene PRs

Hi Team, Stefan Vodita made an awesome simple PR adding a GitHub action to remind / nag us about stale PRs: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12813 This happened after an in-person discussion at the last Community Over Code NA in Halifax where Stefan learned about the nice automation Apache B

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-19) - Build # 45856 - Unstable!

I'll try to get to the bottom of this Adrien, thanks for digging! I wonder if we are violating this (subtle) requirement in the Terms.intersect API: Note that the provided startTerm must be accepted by the automaton. The failures involving DirectPostingsFormat seem angry that we are indeed

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-9.x - Build # 7187 - Still Unstable!

I'll try to bottom this one out. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 6:25 AM Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Check-9.x/7187/ > > 1 tests failed. > FAILED: org.apache.lucene

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-17.0.9) - Build # 45858 - Still Unstable!

Oh this is the new (awesome) check Adrien recent added to CheckIndex, so maybe this check is catching some pre-existing bugs in one of our (hopefully experimental, not default!) codecs? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:43 PM Michael McCandless <

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-17.0.9) - Build # 45858 - Still Unstable!

Hmm anyone know why this test suddenly started failing...? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:35 PM Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-main-Linux/45858/ > Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-17.0.9 -X

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.1 RC1

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:33 AM Adrien Grand wrote: Thanks Chris for taking care of this release. > +1! And sorry about the respin... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-NightlyTests-main - Build # 1209 - Unstable!

ngs. > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:16 PM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> OK I reverted the "optimization" to not pull FieldInfo for a field when >> getting Points values from SlowCompositeCodecReaderWrapper! Clearly it

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-MMAPv2-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-17.0.9) - Build # 1537 - Failure!

Timeout. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 9:09 AM Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-MMAPv2-Linux/1537/ > Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-17.0.9 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseShenandoahGC > > All

Re: Running tests with streaming console output but NOT verbose?

is enabled. You can turn it > off independently though (-Ptests.infostream=false) or even set the default > in your gradle.properties... > > So I don't think there's anything to do here? For the record, all the test > options and their defaults are displayed with: > > g

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.1 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:14:52.296147] I also cracked a bit of rust off our Monster tests and all but one passed: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12942 Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 4:24 PM Benjamin Trent wrote: > SUCCESS! [1:06:02.232333] > > + 1! > >

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-MacOSX (64bit/hotspot/jdk-17.0.9) - Build # 3226 - Failure!

Build timed out. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 7:50 PM Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-9.x-MacOSX/3226/ > Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-17.0.9 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC > > All t

Re: Running tests with streaming console output but NOT verbose?

ts.gradle. > > def verboseMode = resolvedTestOption("tests.verbose").toBoolean() > > I can't remember why it aligns with Lucene's logger. Maybe it should/could > be a > separate property? I find it difficult to come up with a reasonable name > though. &g

Running tests with streaming console output but NOT verbose?

Hi Team, This is prolly a Dawid question... Sometimes I want to run a test (like a slow Monster test), seeing its ongoing musings popping out on the console in "real time" (not buffered). I can do this today by adding "-Dtests.verbose=true" to the ./gradlew invocation that's running the test. B

Re: The need for a Lucene 9.9.1 release

ike, > > > On 12 Dec 2023, at 12:56, Michael McCandless > wrote: > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > I think we should also regenerate the FSTs for 9.9.1? > > Seems reasonable. > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12924 > > I adde

Re: The need for a Lucene 9.9.1 release

Hi Chris, I think we should also regenerate the FSTs for 9.9.1? https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12924 Thanks, Mike On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 7:54 AM Guo Feng wrote: > Heads up: > > The bug fix PR (https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12900) has been > merged to main, and backported

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-NightlyTests-main - Build # 1209 - Unstable!

OK I reverted the "optimization" to not pull FieldInfo for a field when getting Points values from SlowCompositeCodecReaderWrapper! Clearly it was not safe ;) Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 8:06 AM Michael McCandless wrote: > Uh oh -- I&#x

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-NightlyTests-main - Build # 1209 - Unstable!

Uh oh -- I'll dig. We may need to put back the FieldInfo check before pulling points. Tricky! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 3:55 AM Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > Build: > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-MMAPv2-Linux (64bit/openj9/jdk-17.0.8) - Build # 1500 - Unstable!

Oh, nevermind -- we have seen it before, and added a comment on the upstream (Open J9) issue: https://github.com/eclipse-openj9/openj9/issues/18400#issuecomment-1795093834 Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 8:32 AM Michael McCandless wrote: > Hmm -- t

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-MMAPv2-Linux (64bit/openj9/jdk-17.0.8) - Build # 1500 - Unstable!

Hmm -- this looks like maybe another Open J9 specific failure? I have not seen this one before I think... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:20 PM Policeman Jenkins Server < jenk...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-MMAPv

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21) - Build # 14204 - Unstable!

Hmm this reproduces for me, and looks new/unique. Could it be related to recent 9.9.0 changes / release blocker? Mike On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 3:33 PM Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-9.x-Linux/14204/ > Java: 64bit/hotspot/jdk-11.0.21 -XX:+UseCompre

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.0 RC2

+1 SUCCESS! [0:20:12.297376] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:21 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > Hi, > > I let Policeman Jenkins run the smoke tester with Java 11 and Java 17 > (unfortunately we have no support for 21 yet, so new MMap and Vectors were > not

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.0 RC1

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 9:56 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: P.S. I’m less sure about this, but the RC 2 starts a 72hr voting time > again? (Just so I know what TTL to put on that) > Yeah a new 72 hour clock starts with each new RC :) Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com

Re: GitHub issues vs PRs vs Lucene's CHANGES.txt

McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 6:01 AM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Oh, and that the CHANGES.txt entries in e.g. 9.9.0 section match on 9.x > and main branches... I think that one we have some automation to catch? >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.9.0 RC1

+1 to release. I hit a corner-case test failure and opened a PR to fix it: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12859 I don't think this should block the release? -- it looks exotic. Thanks Chris! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 1:16 AM Patrick Zhai w

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-main - Build # 10750 - Unstable!

I hit this one running the smoke tester on 9.9.0 RC 0, and it repros. I'll open an issue ... I think it's just a missing null check in the SlowCompositeCodecReaderWrapper. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 6:37 PM Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apac

Re: GitHub issues vs PRs vs Lucene's CHANGES.txt

Oh, and that the CHANGES.txt entries in e.g. 9.9.0 section match on 9.x and main branches... I think that one we have some automation to catch? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:58 AM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >

GitHub issues vs PRs vs Lucene's CHANGES.txt

Hi Team, I see Chris is tagging issues that were left open after their linked PRs were merged (thanks!). Is there something in our release tooling that cross-checks all the weakly linked metadata today: Milestone marked (or more often: not) on an issue vs commits to the respective branches vs loc

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-9.x-Linux (64bit/hotspot/jdk-19) - Build # 14180 - Failure!

JVM crashed: # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x7f9fa8545493, pid=2982126, tid=2990096 # # JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (19.0+36) (build 19+36-2238) # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (19+36-2238, mixed mode, sharing, ti

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >