Request to Get Edit Permission

Hi, Can I get edit access to Apache Kafka's Wiki please? Thanks, Hailey

Requesting permission to contribute to Apache Kafka

Hi, This is Hailey. Wiki ID: hni. May I request edit permission to the Kafka Wiki please? Thanks, Hailey

[DISCUSS] KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers

Hi all, I would like to start the discussion about *KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers* < https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-979%3A+Allow+independently+stop+KRaft+controllers+or+brokers > It proposes adding an optional field "--process.roles " in the

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers

les=controller. But if they did want to stop a particular > controller they could then also achieve that via kafka-server-stop > --required-config node.id=1 (for example). What do you think? > > Ron > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 5:56 PM Hailey Ni > wrote: > > > > Hi all,

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers

d. But if it is easy to achieve > and doesn't add any additional cognitive load -- and at first glance > it does seem so -- we should probably just support it. > > Ron > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 6:15 PM Hailey Ni > wrote: > > > > Hi Ron, > > > > Th

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers

Updated. Please let me know if you have any additional comments. Thank you! On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 3:02 PM Hailey Ni wrote: > Hi Ron. Thanks for the response. I agree with your point. I'll make the > corresponding changes in the KIP and KAFKA-15471 > <https://issues.apach

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers

erent -- it seems it would probably be easier to not have to worry > about restricting to specific cases, actually. WDYT? > > Ron > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 5:12 PM Hailey Ni > wrote: > > > > Updated. Please let me know if you have any additional comments. Thank > y

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers

t; > > Thanks for the KIP. I think this approach based on configs is a bit too > > > open ended and not very user friendly. Why don't we simply provide > flags > > > for the things a user may care about? So far, it seems like we have two > > > good candidates (nod

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers

oller). Thanks, Hailey On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 1:17 PM Hailey Ni wrote: > Hi Ismeal, > > Thanks for the comments. I'll change the implementation to use a pair of > mutually exclusive args --process.roles and --node.id. > > Thanks, > Hailey > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 a

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-979: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers

th the other tools, I would suggest to use > --process-role and --node-id (hyphen instead of dot). Can you also > update the KIP? > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 10:18 PM Hailey Ni > wrote: > > > > Hi Kamal, > > > > I think the broker.id property has been replac

[VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

Hi all, I'd like to call a vote on KIP-979 that will allow users to independently stop KRaft processes. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-979%3A+Allow+independently+stop+KRaft+processes Thanks, Hailey

Re: [VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

leri > wrote: > > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Thanks. > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 9:48 AM Kamal Chandraprakash > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

-line option can be given. What > happens if both are given? > > best, > Colin > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, at 12:20, Hailey Ni wrote: > > Hi Ron, > > > > I've added the "Rejected Alternatives" section in the KIP. Thanks for the > > comment

Re: [VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

nks, Hailey. > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Colin > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, at 15:13, Hailey Ni wrote: > > > Hi Colin, > > > > > > Thank you for your review. I removed the "absolute path need to be > > > provided" line from

Re: [VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

Thanks Justine! On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:40 AM Justine Olshan wrote: > Thanks Hailey for the update. +1 (binding) from me :) > > Justine > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 11:32 AM Hailey Ni > wrote: > > > Hey Justine, > > > > Thank you very much for the re

Re: [VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

Hi everyone, With +3 binding votes (and +2 non-binding), the vote passes. *KIP-979* Allow independently stop KRaft processes is Adopted! Thank you all for your reviews and votes. Regards, Hailey On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:43 PM Hailey Ni wrote: > Thanks Justine! > > On Fri, Nov 17

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-15471) Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers

Hailey Ni created KAFKA-15471: - Summary: Allow independently stop KRaft controllers or brokers Key: KAFKA-15471 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15471 Project: Kafka Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-17973) Relax Restriction for Voters Set Change

Hailey Ni created KAFKA-17973: - Summary: Relax Restriction for Voters Set Change Key: KAFKA-17973 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17973 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Task