Hi Ron, I've added the "Rejected Alternatives" section in the KIP. Thanks for the comments and +1 vote!
Thanks, Hailey On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:33 AM Ron Dagostino <rndg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Hailey. I'm +1 (binding), but could you add a "Rejected > Alternatives" section to the KIP and mention the "--required-config " > option that we decided against and the reason why we made the decision > to reject it? There were some other small things (dash instead of dot > in the parameter names, --node-id instead of --broker-id), but > cosmetic things like this don't warrant a mention, so I think there's > just the one thing to document. > > Thanks for the KIP, and thanks for adjusting it along the way as the > discussion moved forward. > > Ron > > > Ron > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 4:00 AM Federico Valeri <fedeval...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Thanks. > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 9:48 AM Kamal Chandraprakash > > <kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, 12:55 Hailey Ni <h...@confluent.io.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-979 that will allow users to > independently > > > > stop KRaft processes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-979%3A+Allow+independently+stop+KRaft+processes > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hailey > > > > >
