interested folks may not have had a chance
to look into it yet.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 6:45 PM Satish Duggana wrote:
>
> +1 for the KIP.
>
> Thanks,
> Satish.
>
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 18:31, Kamal Chandraprakash
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-bind
rlin
[2]
https://ge.apache.org/scans/failures?search.relativeStartTime=P28D&search.rootProjectNames=kafka&search.timeZoneId=Europe/Berlin
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 8:09 PM Kirk True wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> I’ve noticed that we’re back in the state where it’s tough to get
+1 (binding)
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 2:56 PM ziming deng wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) from me.
>
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> --
> Ziming
>
> > On Jul 26, 2023, at 20:18, Luke Chen wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding) from me.
> >
> > T
nge in
future but the implementation is not recommended to be used in
production.
Thoughts?
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 6:31 PM Hector Geraldino (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD
A) wrote:
>
> Yes, still need one more binding vote to pass. I'll send a reminder if the
> vote is still p
hich case I apologize for
bringing this naive point).
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 2:27 PM Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> Hi Divij,
>
> Some of these are launch checklist items (not really goals) and some are
> compatibility guarantees. More below.
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023,
aning of early
> access, we have two options:
>
> 1. Have a KIP specifically for tiered storage.
> 2. Have a KIP to define general guidelines for what early access means.
>
> Does this make sense?
>
> Ismael
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 6:38 PM Divij Vaidya
> wrote:
No. We started using gradle analysis starting July 12th. Prior to
that, the only data that we have is coming from Apache CI which AFAIK
doesn't have a per-test history view -
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Kafka/job/kafka/job/trunk/
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 1:04 AM Kirk
ns on
every commit on every PR. From our earlier discussion on this thread,
we discussed to only add it for "branch builder". Also, please add
option of adding test to "PR builder" in the rejected alternative
section.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 8:40 AM Vaibhav Nazar
houghts on that thread.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 6:03 PM Andrew Schofield
wrote:
>
> Hi Christo,
> I agree with you.
>
> Option 4.1 without a KIP seems like an acceptable starting point for something
> which will be relatively rare, provided that it’s easy for the
ss+Release+Notes
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-405%3A+Kafka+Tiered+Storage
--
Divij Vaidya
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 4:55 AM ziming deng
wrote:
> Hi Liam,
>
> The Apache Kafka project has several modules, I think you should firstly
> sele
+1 (binding)
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Vaibhav Nazare
wrote:
>
> I'd like to call a vote on KIP-942
ge we get is that, unlike nightly builds
which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively
monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add
this new suite without adding a new routine in the maintenance.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 6:49 PM Colin M
while, the workaround is to restart the tests.
Cheers!
--
Divij Vaidya
This should be fixed now. Please comment on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24927 if you find a case
where you still hit this problem.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 12:05 PM Luke Chen wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info, Divij!
>
> Luke
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 202
you please quantify (with an experiment) the expected perf
impact of adding the partition dimension? This could be done as part
of "test plan" section and would serve as a data point for users to
understand the potential impact if they decide to turn it on.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Sat, Sep 9,
adding the TLA+ spec as
part of the community owned project itself.
Right now, things are a bit busy on my end, but I am looking forward
to exploring what you shared above in the coming weeks (perhaps a
first review by end of sept).
Thank you again for starting this conversation.
--
Divij Vaidya
this test suite 5 times won't be a burden to the CI
> > infrastructure. The advantage we get is that, unlike nightly builds
> > which have a chance of being ignored, branch builds are actively
> > monitored by folks in the community. Hence, we will be able to add
> &
e as
part of tiered storage
3. verified that public keys for RM are available at https://keys.openpgp.org/
4. verified that public keys for RM are available at
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 12:41 PM Sagar wrote:
>
> Hey Satish,
>
>
Hey Satish
My comments about documentation misses from RC0 vote thread [1] are
still not addressed (such as missing metric documentation, formatting
problems etc). Could you please mention why we shouldn't consider them
as blockers to make RC1 as the final release?
[1] https://lists.apache.org/th
Hey Satish
I filed a PR to fix the website formatting bug in 3.6 documentation -
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14419
Please take a look when you get a chance.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 5:36 PM Chris Egerton wrote:
>
> Hi Satish,
>
> I think this qualifies
Congratulations Yash!
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 6:18 PM Sagar wrote:
>
> Congrats Yash !
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 at 9:38 PM, Ashwin wrote:
>
> > Awesome ! Congratulations Yash !!
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 9:25 PM Edoardo Comar
> > w
ifferently.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 1:26 AM Satish Duggana wrote:
>
> Thanks Divij for raising a PR for doc formatting issue.
>
> On Thu, 21 Sep, 2023, 2:22 PM Divij Vaidya, wrote:
>
> > Hey Satish
> >
> > I filed a PR to fix the website form
Congratulations Justine!
On Sat 23. Sep 2023 at 07:06, Chris Egerton wrote:
> Congrats Justine!
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 20:47 Guozhang Wang
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 8:44 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Congratulations Justine!
> > >
> > >
could post the results of system tests before I
vote on this. I am particularly interested in looking at
producer/consumer performance results since we have quite a few
changes in this release. What is the plan on the system tests?
--
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 9:10 AM Luke Chen wrote
Correction: posted the wrong JIRA in my previous email. Instead of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15001, please consider
this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15487
--
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:04 AM Divij Vaidya wrote:
>
> Hi Satish
>
> 1.
ng it here as an FYI.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:16 AM Divij Vaidya wrote:
>
> Found a bug while testing TS feature in 3.6 -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15481
>
> I don't consider it as a blocker for release since it's a concurrency
> b
Hey team
I need help in determining whether
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14457 is a release blocker bug or
not. If someone is familiar with replication protocol (on the log
diverange and reconciliation process), please add your comments on the
PR.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at
Ismael,
Thank you for checking.
Multiple other folks have validated after I left the comment here that
it doesn't impact log truncation and hence won't lead to data loss. I
agree that it's not a blocker.
(ref: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14457)
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Se
se blocker but we should add it as a fast follow-up.
2. Metric added in
https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/a900794ace4dcf1f9dadee27fbd8b63979532a18
isn't available in documentation (cc: David). I don't consider this as a
release blocker but we should add it as a fast follow-up.
--
Di
operational
stability-wise, otherwise).
For 3.5.2, I think there are sufficient pending (including some CVE fixes)
to start a bug fix release. We just need a volunteer for the release
manager.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 9:57 AM Levani Kokhreidze
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> KAFKA
Thank you for volunteering Luke.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 3:26 PM Bill Bejeck wrote:
> Thanks for driving the release, Luke.
>
> +1
> -Bill
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 5:05 AM Satish Duggana
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Luke for volunteering for 3.5.2 r
ilities on PMC).
Later, we can work towards adding RSS feed to enable "subscription" to this
news and add additional filters such as CVE clarifications etc.
What do you think?
--
Divij Vaidya
es.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15653
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/pfrkk0yb394l5qp8h5mv9vwthx15084j
--
Divij Vaidya
Congratulations Satish! And thank you for your contributions so far.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 5:18 PM Lucas Brutschy
wrote:
> Congrats!
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 5:06 PM Manikumar
> wrote:
> >
> > Congrats!
> >
> > On Fri, Oct
r? Also, I am happy with having a Kafka level
dynamic config that we can use to filter our metric/dimensionality since we
have a precedence at KIP-544. Hence, my suggestion to push this filtering
to metric library can be ignored.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 11:37 AM Qichao Ch
ell)
4. what happens when there are contradictory regEx rules, e.g. a topic
defined in high as well as low. It is generally solved by defining
precedence. In our case, we can choose that high has more precedence than
low.
What do you think?
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 2:07 PM Qichao Chu
Hey Dasun
Subscribe/unsubscribe to the mailing list is self service. You can find the
details at https://kafka.apache.org/contact
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 7:37 PM Dasun Nirmitha
wrote:
> Hello Apache Kafka Mail Thread,
> Thanks for having me in your mail thread for a
time to think about the implications of current approach towards
extendibility to other dimensions in future (such as e.g. client language
instead of partition).
I will get back to you before the end of this week.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 4:05 PM Qichao Chu wrote:
> Hi Di
f
not, RemoteLogSegmentMetadata also contains a map, CustomMetadata which is
opaque to the broker and is populated by RemoteLogMetadataManager. You can
choose to feed any attributes you require into this custom metadata and
read it in RSM.
Does this answer your question?
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Nov 8, 20
viewers in allocating their bandwidth effectively.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 2:58 AM Justine Olshan
wrote:
> I will say that I have also seen tests that seem to be more flaky
> intermittently. It may be ok for some time and suddenly the CI is
> overloaded and we see is
Thank you for updating the KIP Qichao.
I don't have any more questions or suggestions. Looks good to move forward
from my perspective.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 2:25 PM Qichao Chu wrote:
> Thank you again for the nice suggestions, Jorge!
> I will wait for Divij
e are targeting for 3.6.1 along with
the detailed timeline.
If anyone is interested in releasing this sooner, please feel free to take
over from me.
Thanks!
Regards,
Divij Vaidya
Apache Kafka Committer
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15653
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
As a future step in Tiered Storage, I would actually
prefer to move towards a direction where we are lazily fetching indexes
on-demand instead of fetching them together as proposed in the KIP.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 4:00 PM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
quilcate.jo...@gmail.co
o,
my offer to volunteer for Jan release could be considered as a backup.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 3:40 PM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi Divij,
>
> I think we should be releasing 3.6.1 this year rather than next. There are
> some critical bugs in 3.6.0 and I don't thin
ffort to
merge some of the critical ones by next week. I will nudge the contributors
where things are pending for a while.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15420
--
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 4:10 PM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi Divij,
>
> You beat me to i
s://kafka.apache.org/contributing -> Finding a project to work on
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 4:24 PM Николай Ижиков wrote:
>
> > To kickstart this effort, we can publish a list of such tickets in the
> community and assign one or more committers the role of a «shepherd&quo
1]
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/832627fc78484fdc7c8d6da8a2d20e7691dbf882/core/src/main/java/kafka/log/remote/RemoteLogManager.java#L1310
[2]
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/832627fc78484fdc7c8d6da8a2d20e7691dbf882/core/src/main/java/kafka/log/remote/RemoteLogManager.java#L1358
--
Di
ny further questions regarding this, please don't hesitate to
reach out to us at secur...@kafka.apache.org or post a comment at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15658
Best Regards,
Divij Vaidya
On behalf of Apache Kafka PMC
[1] https://zookeeper.apache.org/security.html#CVE-2023-
+1 (binding)
I was involved in the discussion thread for this KIP and support it in its
current form.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 10:55 AM Qichao Chu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for KIP-977: Partition-Level Throughput Metrics.
>
> Ple
+ 1 (binding)
This Kip will greatly improve Tiered Storage troubleshooting. Thank you
Christo.
On Mon 20. Nov 2023 at 17:21, Christo Lolov wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> Now that the discussion for KIP-963 has winded down, I would like to open
> it for a vote targeting 3.7.0 as the release. You can fi
,
just to get a better aligned conventional does not seem worthwhile to me.
Is there an obvious benefit that I am missing here which would make this
proposal a good trade off with the cost?
—
Divij Vaidya
On Thu 6. Jun 2024 at 21:13, Eric Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to follow-
approach (and other alternatives) to
solve this issue?
—
Divij Vaidya
On Thu 16. May 2024 at 22:15, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Justine. I have updated the KIP with the configuration details.
>
> On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 21:14, Justine Ol
ibility will be delegated to the decoder class which the
operator can define using the flag "--value-decoder-class".
Is there a reason that you are unable to use the rejected solution (which
requires no changes) for debugging purposes?
--
Divij Vaidya
On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 4:43 PM Federico
cer buffer) but
we have started recording end-to-end latency for the steady-state messages.
I imagine this should be ok because it achieves the purpose of
removing bootstrap times, but I haven't been able to reason about it in my
head. What are your thoughts on this?
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fr
oposed API take "segmentId" as a parameter instead of
"topicIdPartition"? Suggesting because isTxnIdEmpty is not a property of a
partition, instead it's a property of a specific segment.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts about the alternatives. Let's get
this f
ve to
iterate through the metadata for the dominant case where the partition had
no transactions at all.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:42 AM Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bump. Please review this proposal.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17
ecify a particular schema version?
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 5:57 PM Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Federico,
>
> Thanks for the KIP! +1 from me.
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024, 17:36 Luke Chen wrote:
>
> > Hi Federico,
&
Thank you Federico for answering the questions. No more questions/concerns
from me. The KIP looks good.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:02 AM Federico Valeri
wrote:
> Hi Divij, thanks for you questions and suggestions, much appreciated.
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 1:12
+1 (binding)
I have participated in the discussion and agree with the proposal.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 12:56 PM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> Thanks Federico for the KIP.
>
> +1
>
> ~Satish.
>
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 13:44, Federico Valeri
> wrote:
>
OffsetMovedToTieredException
3. Follower builds aux state from [0-10] and sets the fetch offset to 11
4. But leader has already uploaded more data and now the new
last-tiered-offset is 15
5. Go back to 2
This could cause a cycle where the replica will be stuck trying to
reconcile with the leader.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri
te to respond to
the follower. The amount of this data can be controlled via the configured
value Z which can be set based on how aggressive the upload/archival
process is.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 12:25 PM Divij Vaidya
wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I am late to the party bu
gt; available anymore, the follower will eventually be able to catch up with
> the leader by resetting its fetch offset until the offset
> is available on the leader's local log. Once it catches up, replication on
> the follower can proceed.
>
> Regards,
> Abhijeet.
>
>
>
world.
I am ok with adding a note in the KIP but the note should say that it has
an elevated risk for this scenario due to increased probability of having
an aggressive local cleanup with Tiered Storage.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 1:22 PM Abhijeet Kumar
wrote:
> Hi Divij,
>
tely new functionality.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15495
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15489
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14874
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 4:59 PM Josep Prat
wrote:
> Hi Justine, Luke, and others,
>
ous
other things (I came across another one
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16041) that we can start doing
now for 4.x.
What do you think?
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:30 PM David Jacot
wrote:
> Hi Divij,
>
> > Release 4.0 as an "experimental" release
r upgrade on a
Kafka version. From 4.0, we will of course, default to using
incrementalAlterConfig.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 6:54 AM ziming deng
wrote:
> +1 for adding them to rejected alternatives, These kafka-ui tools should
> also evolve with the iterations of Kafk
on and compression that occurs during message
version transformation, i.e. when client send message with V1 and broker
expects in V2, we convert the message and recompress it.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 7:22 PM Diop, Assane wrote:
> I would like to bring some attention to
error
means for operations that can be performed on a partition.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/82808873cbf6a95611243c2e7984c4aa6ff2cfff/core/src/main/scala/kafka/log/UnifiedLog.scala#L1336
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:58 AM Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak..
shared here.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 2:05 PM Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi Sophie and Philip and all,
>
> I share the same pain as you.
> I've been waiting for a CI build result in a PR for days. Unfortunately, I
> can only get 1 result each day because it takes 8 hou
, this incompatibility will be part of
one amongst many changes that users will perform to upgrade to 4.x. This is
unlike a major version change from 3.7 to 3.8 where users expect a simple
upgrade without any code changes.
Let's wait and hear what others think about this.
--
Divij Vaidya
O
anecdote, a recent performance regression was found in 17,
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8317960, which was already fixed in 21)
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 9:58 PM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> A couple of comments:
>
> 1. It is true that full support for
I have started to perform an analysis of the OOM at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16052. Please feel free to
contribute to the investigation.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 1:23 AM Justine Olshan
wrote:
> I am still seeing quite a few OOM errors in the builds and I
Thank you everyone for your warm wishes 🙏
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 2:37 PM Yash Mayya wrote:
> Congratulations Divij!
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 5:15 PM Luke Chen wrote:
>
> > Hi, Everyone,
> >
> > Divij has been a Kafka committer since Ju
interfaces in the KIP.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 2:19 PM Christo Lolov
wrote:
> Heya!
>
> Thanks a lot for this. I have updated the KIP to include exposing the
> tiered-offset as well. Let me know whether the Public Interfaces section
> needs more explanation
+1 (binding)
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:06 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Hi Ismael,
>
> I think it's important to make this change, the youtube video you posted on
> the discussion thread makes very good arguments and so does the KIP. Java 8
> is almost
+1 (binding)
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:30 AM Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi Kamal,
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
> +1 (binding) from me.
>
> Luke
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:51 PM Christo Lolov
> wrote:
>
> > Heya Kamal,
> >
> > The propos
Thank you for addressing my concerns Kamal. Though, instead of the KIP, I
actually was suggesting to add it in JavaDoc so that someone looking at the
exception is able to understand what it means. We can discuss that during
the PR review though.
The KIP looks good to me.
--
Divij Vaidya
On
ith AWS & Apache Infra in the
next 1-2 months.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 9:21 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
> Sorry, but to put it bluntly, the current build setup isn't good enough at
> partial rebuilds that build caching would make sense. All Kafka devs have
> had t
her to add them or not? If we keep a blanket criteria of
accepting all PRs, then we may end up in a situation where the llink
redirects to a phishing page or nefarious website. Hence, we might have to
at least perform some basic due diligence which adds overhead to the
resources of the community.
/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=284789510
Does this answer your question?
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 9:37 PM Devinder Saggu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder how long Kafka 3.0 can support Java 8.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> *Devinder Singh*
> P *Please consider the environment before printing this email*
>
Thank you for making the change Christo. It looks good to me.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:19 AM Christo Lolov
wrote:
> Thank you Divij!
>
> I have updated the KIP to explicitly state that the broker will have a
> different behaviour when a timestamp of -5 is reque
+1 (binding)
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 7:05 AM Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
>
> --
> Kamal
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 2:23 PM Christo Lolov
> wrote:
>
> > Heya all
+1 (binding)
I have participated in the discussion for this and looked at the most
recent version of this KIP. It looks good to me.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 8:17 AM David Jacot
wrote:
> Hi Chris, Ziming,
>
> Thanks for the clarification. I am glad that it does not i
ed+Storage+Early+Access+Release+Notes
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 1:03 PM Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There is a bug KAFKA-16101
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16101> reporting that "Kafka
> cluster will be unavailable during KRaft migrat
compression controls in Kafka?
It might be beneficial to have a joint proposal of these two KIPs which may
satisfy both use cases.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 11:14 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm resurrecting this old thread as this KIP would be a nice
> improve
Sounds good. I am onboard to start with first steps and eventually move
towards a place where compression codec settings are more generic /
pluggable.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:40 PM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi Divij,
>
> Thanks for bringing that point. After reading K
test results
Test: Spot check the results of system tests.
Result: I have verified that the system tests are passing across different
runs.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 2:50 PM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
> The latest system test build completed successfully -
>
> https
kafka binaries.
I am +1 (binding) assuming Mickael's concerns about update notes to 3.7 are
addressed before release.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 6:08 PM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Josep, I don't think it's worth making a new RC j
e your PRs
on kafka-site repo get merged.
4. Send a release announcement by email.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 3:02 PM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
> Thanks for testing the release! And thanks for the review on the
> documentation. Good catch on the license too.
>
> I have
Hey Vaibhav
I have provided you with contributor permission to the JIRA. You should be
able to assign the JIRA to yourself now.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 12:23 AM Vaibhav Kushwaha
wrote:
> Hi team!
>
> I was going through the list of starter bugs and found one I coul
Thank you for volunteering Josep. +1 from me.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:35 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
> Thanks Josep!
>
> +1
>
> Best,
> Bruno
>
> On 2/26/24 9:53 PM, Chris Egerton wrote:
> > Thanks Josep, I'm +1 as well.
> >
> >
ntral (mvnrepository.com or maven.org)."
in the release process wiki.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 4:43 PM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Everything site-related is merged.
>
> I have been following the final steps of the release process.
> - Docker
ful changes in this release but the one closest to my
heart is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15046. I am very glad
this is fixed. The P999 latency spikes were driving me crazy for a long
time now.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:06 AM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> Thanks Sta
. You can either create a KIP
offline and share it in the discussion email or I can create the KIP page
on your behalf and copy/paste the content that you send to me.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:15 PM Arpit Goyal wrote:
> + @Kamal Chandraprakash @Vaidya, Divij
> Can you h
t want to work
with a segment.ms of less than ~10s (number chosen arbitrary that looks
sane)
What was the historical context of setting the minimum threshold to 1ms for
this setting?
[1] https://kafka.apache.org/documentation.html#topicconfigs_segment.ms
--
Divij Vaidya
once it is ready to be
published, we can start a discussion thread on it.
I am also going to start a thread to solicit feedback from users@ mailing
list as well.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:55 PM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I thi
adjusted. Please reply in this
thread directly.
--
Divij Vaidya
Apache Kafka PMC
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:56 PM Divij Vaidya
wrote:
> Thanks for the discussion folks. I have started a KIP
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1030%3A+Change+constraints+and+default+valu
+1
Thank you for volunteering.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 4:58 PM Justine Olshan
wrote:
> Thanks Manikumar!
> +1 from me
>
> Justine
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 8:52 AM Manikumar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to volunteer
.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 7:55 AM Manikumar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is the release plan for 3.6.2:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+plan+3.6.2
>
> Currently there is one open non-
zstd)
Things look good to me. We don't need another RC for fixing docs.
+1 (binding) from me.
--
Divij Vaidya
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 10:04 AM Manikumar wrote:
> Hi Justine,
>
> Thanks for catching this. looks like we have missed updating
> `docs/documentation.html` in kafka re
1 - 100 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
