/pull/12505*
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12509
Best,Christo
On Thursday, 4 August 2022, 18:27:17 BST, Divij Vaidya
wrote:
Hi everyone
To provide you with quick updates on the progress.
Open PRs (pending review):
1. Streams - https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1244
Hello!
Apologies for the delay in my reply. I have started working on migrating the
TaskManagerTest to Mockito, but have not raised a pull request yet. It is on
the list in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14133 and I will add
you as a reviewer the moment I publish it.
Best,Christo
the cluster.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-895%3A+Dynamically+refresh+partition+count+of+__consumer_offsets
Let me know your thoughts on the matter!
Best,Christo
Hello Colin,
Thank you for the swift and informative reply! I will have a look at the
suggested tickets and pick up one of the free ones.
Best,
Christo
On Sunday, 19 June 2022, 22:46:41 BST, Colin McCabe
wrote:
Hi Christo NUKK,
We have been trying to label KRaft issues on JIRA with
provision a whole new cluster
which just doesn't have it enabled.
My preference would be for option 4.1 without a KIP followed by option 4.2
in the future with a KIP once KIP-950 makes it in.
Please let me know your thoughts!
Best,
Christo
.
Thanks in advance for leaving a review!
Best,
Christo
with whether I need to change
*remote.log.manager.task.interval.ms
<http://remote.log.manager.task.interval.ms> *to a lower or higher value.
What are your thoughts on the above? Would you find some of them more
useful than others?
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 at 16:43, Kamal Chandrap
title in the KIPs page, that's my miss
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 13:21, Divij Vaidya wrote:
> Hey Satish
>
> Thank you for managing this release. I have a few comments:
>
> Documentation
>
> 1. Section: Zookeeper/Stable Version - The documentation states &q
back to you.
Best,
Christo
On Mon, 25 Sept 2023 at 10:49, Gantigmaa Selenge
wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> Thank you for writing the KIP.
>
> I recently raised a PR to add metrics for tracking remote segment deletions
> (https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14375) but realised th
metrics and their granularity!
Best,
Christo
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 10:14, Christo Lolov wrote:
> Heya Gantigmaa,
>
> Apologies for the (very) late reply!
>
> Now that 3.6 has been released and reviewers have a bit more time I will
> be picking up this KIP again. I am more
ri, 27 Oct 2023 at 15:24, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> Thanks for proposing KIP, this metrics will certainly be useful to operate
> Kafka Tiered Storage as it becomes production-ready.
>
> 1. Given that the scope of the KI
will aim to include it.
*re: Kamal*
1. I can add this to the KIP, but similar to what I have mentioned earlier,
I believe these are better left to plugin implementations, no?
2. Yeah, this makes sense.
Best,
Christo
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 09:33, Satish Duggana
wrote:
> Thanks Christo for
, hence we will be
serving requests for those from remote. Am I wrong?
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 08:45, Satish Duggana
wrote:
> Thanks Christo for your reply.
>
> 101 and 102 We have conclusion on them.
>
> 103. I am not strongly opinionated on this. I am fine if
Hello all!
Now that the discussion for KIP-963 has winded down, I would like to open
it for a vote targeting 3.7.0 as the release. You can find the current
version of the KIP at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-963%3A+Additional+metrics+in+Tiered+Storage
Best,
Christo
changing the AdminClient and in particular the GetOffsetShell tool.
I am looking forward to your suggestions for improvement!
Best,
Christo
Heya!
Thanks a lot for this. I have updated the KIP to include exposing the
tiered-offset as well. Let me know whether the Public Interfaces section
needs more explanations regarding the changes needed to the OffsetSpec or
others.
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 04:20, Satish Duggana
Hello all,
With 3 +1 binding and 1 +1 non-binding votes KIP-963 is adopted 🥳!
I will get down to implementing it.
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 07:22, Luke Chen wrote:
> +1 (binding) from me.
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> Luke
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:53 AM Satis
)) and one at what you are proposing? As an
operator I would find it strange to not see the metric in the
RequestMetrics.
Your thoughts?
Best,
Christo
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 at 10:52, Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Christo,
>
> Updated the KIP with t
Heya Kamal,
Thanks for the KIP and the answers in the discussion!
+1 from me :)
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 11:11, Federico Valeri wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 12:05 PM Luke Chen wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kamal,
> >
>
implementation) happen synchronously. Should people
run into timeout problems we can always then have a follow-up KIP where we
make it asynchronous.
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 10:04, Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> Thanks for the
8.
Best,
Christo
On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 11:11, Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> > 1. I am not certain I follow the question. From DISABLED you can only go
> to
> ENABLED regardless of whether your cluster is backed by Zookeeper or KRaft.
> Am I misunderstanding your
Heya!
I would like to start a vote on KIP-950: Tiered Storage Disablement in
order to catch the last Kafka release targeting Zookeeper -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-950%3A++Tiered+Storage+Disablement
Best,
Christo
f the
community decides that they do in fact want one more 3.x release.
I will mark the KRaft part as ready to be started and aiming for either 4.0
or 3.9.
Best,
Christo
Hello!
Makes sense thank you for pointing it out, I will aim to update the
section. I also need to add to the section for metrics!
Best,
Christo
On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 at 19:45, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Christo,
>
> Thanks for the KIP and sorry for the late reply.
>
> Since this
e way to achieve this is to keep the
remote.log.disable.policy, but only allow it to take a value of "delete".
What are your thoughts?
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 at 12:10, Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just found the table is not able to be displayed correctly i
Heya Kamal,
The proposed change makes sense to me as it will be a more explicit
behaviour than what Kafka does today - I am happy with it!
+1 (non-binding) from me
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 09:01, Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
&g
Heya all!
KIP-1005 (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1005%3A+Expose+EarliestLocalOffset+and+TieredOffset)
has been open for around a month with no further comments - I would like to
start a voting round on it!
Best,
Christo
Thank you Divij!
I have updated the KIP to explicitly state that the broker will have a
different behaviour when a timestamp of -5 is requested as part of
ListOffsets.
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 at 11:10, Divij Vaidya wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP Christo.
>
> The shell command
. Let me
know if you disagree!
Best,
Christo
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024 at 03:43, Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> Thanks for the KIP!
> One question:
>
> What will the offset return if tiered storage is disabled?
> For "-4 or earliest-local", it should be the same as &
Heya!
Okay, your suggestion also makes sense to me!
I have updated the KIP.
Best,
Christo
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:51, Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> Thanks for the update.
> For "-4 or earliest-local" but tiered storage disabled, I agree it should
> work as
Thank you everyone for casting your votes!
KIP-1005 passes with 6 +1 (three binding and three not binding) - I will
get down to implementing it :)
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 01:35, Luke Chen wrote:
> +1 binding from me.
>
> Thanks for the KIP!
> Luke
>
> On Fri,
welcome!
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 09:44, Doğuşcan Namal
wrote:
> Hi everyone, any progress on the status of this KIP? Overall looks good to
> me but I wonder whether we still need to support it for Zookeeper mode
> given that it will be deprecated in the next 3 months.
>
?
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 at 06:12, Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> Any update with this KIP?
> If you don't have time to complete it, I can collaborate with you to work
> on it.
>
> Thanks.
> Luke
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:38 PM Satish
Thank you everyone!
It wouldn't have been possible without quite a lot of reviews and extremely
helpful inputs from you and the rest of the community! I am looking forward
to working more closely with you going forward :)
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 14:31, Kirk True wrote:
> Congratulations
- earliest-pending-upload-offset or the
latest-tiered-offset? If it is the second, then I believe KIP-1005 ought to
already be exposing that offset as part of the ListOffsets API, no?
Best,
Christo
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 18:23, Abhijeet Kumar
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have created KIP-1023 to
it just won't have an effect. Granted, I do believe we
should restrict the policy being changed while a disablement is ongoing.
re: Satish and Kamal
104, 1 and 2 are fair asks, I will work with Doguscan to update the KIP
with the information!
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 10:31, Doğuş
if you introduce a new offset
(i.e. pending-upload-offset) you have to make a change to the ListOffsets
API (i.e. introduce -6) and thus document it in this KIP as such. However,
the last-tiered-offset ought to already be exposed as part of KIP-1005
(under implementation). Am I misunderstanding someth
n the StopReplicas API which will then disappear in KRaft world as it
is already scheduled for deprecation. What do you think?
Best,
Christo
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 07:59, Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> 1. I agree with Doguscan that in KRaft mode, the controller won't send RPCs
>
Congratulations, Greg :)
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 07:34, Zhisheng Zhang <31791909...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulations Greg!
>
>
> Manikumar 于2024年4月15日周一 13:49写道：
>
> > Congratulations, Greg.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 11:18 AM Bruno Cadonna
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Congratulations, Greg!
> >
should also trust them to be able to abort
a hanging transaction.
I would support this KIP if it is put to the vote unless there are other
suggestions for improvements!
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 16:48, Nikhil Ramakrishnan <
ramakrishnan.nik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyo
a few changes have been discussed so I will aim to put
them on paper in the upcoming days and let everyone know!
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 14:49, Doğuşcan Namal
wrote:
> +1 let's not introduce a new api and mark it immediately as deprecated :)
>
> On your second comment Luke, o
would have to use already existing methods
Let me know if there are any new comments or I have missed something!
Best,
Christo
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 at 12:40, Christo Lolov wrote:
> Heya Doguscan,
>
> I believe that the state of the world after this KIP will be the following:
>
>
Heya Nikhil,
Thanks for the proposal, as mentioned before it makes sense to me!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Christo
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 at 00:25, Justine Olshan
wrote:
> Hey Nikhil,
>
> I meant to comment on the discussion thread, but my draft took so long, you
> opened the vote.
>
Congratulations Igor :) !
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 17:07, Igor Soarez wrote:
> Thanks everyone, I'm very honoured to join!
>
> --
> Igor
>
Heya Abhijeet,
Thanks a lot for pushing this forward, especially with the explanation of
EARLIEST_PENDING_UPLOAD_OFFSET_TIMESTAMP!
+1 from me :)
Best,
Christo
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 12:50, Luke Chen wrote:
> Hi Abhijeet,
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
> +1 from me.
>
> Thanks.
>
twork/RequestChannel.scala#L521-L527
and https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#tiered_storage_monitoring.
If I am right, then I believe it would be very useful if this KIP also
introduces such a metric because the two are tightly coupled.
What do you think?
Best,
Christo
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 11:33, Fed
Hello!
Apologies for the late arrival. I read through the KIP and the discussion
thread and I have no concerns with the proposed approach.
This is a great improvement!
+1 from me.
Best,
Christo
On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 at 02:50, Luke Chen wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Th
elves some of the unassigned
tests their contributions would be welcome :)
Best,
Christo
ound 1/3 are remaining.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14132
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14132> - a little under 1/3 of all
classes using PowerMock have been moved and merged; a bit over 2/3 are
remaining.
Best,
Christo
big thank you to Shekhar Prasad Rajak (who recently joined our effort),
Matthew de Detrich, Dalibor Plavcic, and everyone who has provided reviews over
the last month!
Best,
Christo
be shown in
a KRaft cluster. Please let me know your opinions on the problem and the
presented solution.
Best,
Christo
On Thursday, 29 December 2022 at 14:19:27 GMT, Christo
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello!
> I would like to start this discussion thread on KIP-895: Dynamically
> refresh
:
* https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12728
* https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12781
Best,
Christo
behaviour
either by a reproducible manual test or by a branch with a failing
unit/integration test?
Best,
Christo
> On 18 Jan 2023, at 12:07, Ivan Yurchenko wrote:
>
> Hello!
> I would like to start the discussion thread on KIP-899: Allow clients to
> rebootstrap.
> This KIP
the impression that you are proposing to add validation to a configuration
which didn't have any validation to begin with.
Best,
Christo
On 08/04/2022, 09:54, "Riven Sun" wrote:
Hi devs, I've created a KIP that aims to add the corresponding validator
to the con
configurations before so I would want
to pick up Modifying certain dynamic configurations on the standalone KRaft
controller if possible.
Best,Christo
On Wednesday, 4 May 2022, 02:03:47 BST, Colin McCabe
wrote:
Hi all,
I've written a KIP for marking KRaft as production ready. Please take a lo
the reviews.
Christo
Christo
#issuecomment-1245590870). ZK
3.7.1 also doesn’t support earlier client/server combinations different to what
3.8.1 does.
Best,
Christo
> On 2 Mar 2023, at 07:07, Luke Chen wrote:
>
> Hi Christo,
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
> The motivation of upgrading ZK makes sense.
> And
Hello Ismael,
Thank you for the valid points. I have updated the KIP, but do let me know if
you believe it is still not clear enough.
Best,
Christo
> On 2 Mar 2023, at 15:21, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> Thanks for the KIP. I think the following is a little confusing since it
> doe
have compliance requirements to only run on
stable versions of a software and its dependencies and not keeping the
dependencies up to date renders them unable to use Kafka.
Please, let me know your thoughts on the matter!
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 at 21:56, Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hi,
Hello!
What would you suggest as the best way to get more eyes on KIP-902 as I would
like it to be included it in 3.5.0?
Best,
Christo
> On 16 Mar 2023, at 10:33, Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a reminder that KIP freeze is less than a week away (22 Mar).
&g
concern better than I
could.
Best,
Christo
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 at 00:53, Colin McCabe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023, at 04:58, Christo Lolov wrote:
> > Hello Colin,
> >
> > Thank you for taking the time to review the proposal!
> >
> > I have attached a compat
remove it if you
think it is unnecessary or amend it so that it becomes clearer. Please let
me know what you think!
Best,
Christo
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 at 16:30, Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 7:32 P
accepted until that’s done (since this change will be
fairly intrusive).
Do let me know if I have misunderstood the general sentiment.
Best,
Christo
> On Dec 29, 2022, at 2:18 PM, Christo wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I would like to start this discussion thread on KIP-895: Dyna
.
I am interested in your thoughts and any suggestions for improving the
proposal!
Best,
Christo
an imagine someone saying filter everything above a value X, do some more
complex operation, filter everything above a value X, do another more
complex operation, filter everything above a value X etc.
Let me know your thoughts!
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 at 19:28, David Mariassy
wr
starting a vote soon?
Best,
Christo
On 2022/07/27 10:15:22 Igor Soarez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have proposal to handle JBOD disk failures in KRaft mode.
>
> With KIP-833 KRaft is being marked production ready and ZK mode is being
> deprecated but support for JBOD is still a big feat
Best,
Christo
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 17:19, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a discussion for KIP-934 <
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-934%3A+Add+DeleteTopicPolicy
> >
Hello!
This proposal will address problems with configuration dependencies which I
run into very frequently, so I am fully supporting the development of this
feature!
Best,
Christo
On Mon, 22 May 2023 at 17:18, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
Hey Mickael!
I am giving a +1 (non-binding) for this candidate release.
* Built from the binary tar.gz source with Java 17 and Scala 2.13 on Intel
(m5.4xlarge) and ARM (m6g.4xlarge) machines.
* Ran unit and integration tests on Intel and ARM machines.
* Ran the Quickstart in both Zookeeper and KR
f there is another time I will do my best to appear.
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 17:59, Igor Soarez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Someone suggested at the recent Kafka Summit that it may be useful
> to have a video call to discuss remaining concerns.
>
> I'm proposing we hav
Heya!
5th of June 16:30 - 17:00 UTC works for me.
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 25 May 2023 at 15:14, Igor Soarez wrote:
> Hi Divij, Christo,
>
> Thank you for pointing that out.
>
> Let's aim instead for Monday 5th of June, at the same time – 16:30-17:00
> UTC.
>
> Pleas
e
has been reclaimed would require a bounce of the broker. I have a want
should the KIP be accepted to build upon the proposal to allow
auto-recovery without the need of a restart.
Best,
Christo
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 17:02, Igor Soarez wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> Thank you for the
educe the data they have and only when that also does not work they are
okay with sacrificing all of the data.
Let me know your thoughts!
Best,
Christo
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 at 20:09, Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hi Christo,
>
> We're not adding new stuff to ZK at this point (it's de
the problem of deleting
topics on startup if there is no space left on the disk - is there
something wrong with my setup that you disagree with? I think this will
continue to be the case even when JBOD + KRaft is implemented.
Let me know your thoughts!
Best,
Christo
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 11:03
+1 (non-binding) from me as well! This is the type of problem which is
difficult to become aware of so the more guardrails we put into place the
better.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 23:30, Beyene, Mehari
wrote:
> Thank you, Justin. That makes sense.
> I have updated the KIP to remove the concept of ah
Hello!
I will add KIP-902 to the release plan. I would appreciate a few more
reviews on the pull request (https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13260)
for that KIP as the longer we have it in trunk with tests running against
it the more confidence we will have before the release.
Best,
Christo
tart a discussion on KIP-952: Regenerate segment-aligned
producer snapshots when upgrading to a Kafka version supporting Tiered
Storage (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/dIuzDw) which aims to solve
this issue.
Best,
Christo
that the date for KIP freeze is fast approaching.
What are your thoughts on the matter?
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-952%3A+Regenerate+segment-aligned+producer+snapshots+when+upgrading+to+a+Kafka+version+supporting+Tiered+Storage
Best,
Christo
On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 at 13
Hello,
Wiki ID: christo_lolovJira ID: christo_lolovCould you please grant me the
necessary permissions to contribute to Apache Kafka. I don't know whether the
above are the corrects identifiers, but they were the only ones I could find.
Best wishes,Christo
Wiki ID: christo_lolovJira ID: christo_lolov
Hello,
I have a stuck build which has been going on for more than two days, while
subsequent pull requests (made by other contributors) appear to have completed.
Is there a way I can restart it (https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11214)?
Thanks in advance.
Best,Christo
Hello,
Thanks to both of you for your swift responses, suggestions and action. The
build has now succeeded.
Best,Christo
On Wednesday, 25 August 2021, 08:19:17 BST, Bruno Cadonna
wrote:
Hi Christo,
I stopped the build and restarted it. Hopefully, this time it will not
get stuck
(TopicIdPartition topicIdPartition,
int epochForOffset, long offset) throws RemoteStorageException
This will help plugin implementers to build optimisations such as skip
lists which will give them the next segment quicker than a linear search.
I am keen to hear your thoughts!
Best,
Christo
On Fri, 4 Oct
Many congratulations Kamal! Very well deserved!
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 at 08:21, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congrats Kamal!!
>
> On Tue 1. Oct 2024 at 7.54, Kamal Chandraprakash <
> kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you all for your warm wishes!
Hello,
I have filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17584 as a
blocker. While it has not been introduced by a KIP, I think this has
durability implications and needs to be addressed immediately.
Let me know if you disagree!
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 19 Sept 2024 at 16:01, José Armando
Heya,
I have ran a few times into issues which required adjustment of the thread
pools and having to carry out a rolling restart was cumbersome.
+1 (binding) for the change!
Best,
Christo
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 16:17, Satish Duggana
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2024
Heya,
Apologies for the delay. You have my +1 vote as well! I am excited to see
this making it in 4.0
Best,
Christo
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 at 09:43, Kamal Chandraprakash <
kamal.chandraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The KIP is passed with 3 (+1) binding votes. Thanks everyo
Congratulations Andrew, well deserved!
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 16:36, Josep Prat wrote:
> Congrats Andrew!
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 5:33 PM Mickael Maison
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Andrew!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mickael
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 5:27 PM Kuan Po Tseng
> wrote:
> > >
>
stage in the merge queue + this PR? Or
am I misunderstanding the sequence of events?
Best,
Christo
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 04:20, Chris Egerton wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for the KIP, and for your ongoing work to improve Kafka CI.
>
> Two small thoughts:
>
> 1) Today, there
Congratulations!
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 18:22, David Arthur wrote:
> Congrats!!
>
> David Arthur
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:43 TengYao Chi wrote:
>
> > Thank you very much everyone!!
> >
> > I truly appreciate all your reviews, guidance, and discussions on my code
> > contributions.
> > Y
compile + runtime broker-only dependencies is currently 16
(if I have done my analysis correctly). What problem(s) do you envision
w.r.t. spilling to disk which we wouldn't be able to solve with our own
implementation that require SQLite?
Once again, great work so far!
Best,
Christo
On Sun, 20 Apr
r proposal you put multiple
partitions in the same blob. What and how will move this data back to the
old format used by TS?
How will you handle compaction?
How will you handle indexes?
How will you handle transactions?
Once again, this is quite exciting, so thanks for the contribution!
Best,
Chris
Hello!
Apologies for coming late to the party. I think this is a great idea and
don't see why we can't try it out in practice!
+1 (binding)
Best,
Christo
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 at 15:16, Andrew Schofield <
andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, Iv
Hello!
I would like to volunteer as a release manager for 4.0.1! I haven't done
this before so I will most likely reach out for help if accepted :)
Best,
Christo
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 16:48, Josep Prat
wrote:
> But of course, Vivekanand, you are more than welcome to help out testi
to reach out with any questions or
concerns about the schedule!
Best,
Christo
Hello,
The 23rd is now drawing to an end. I am slightly behind schedule, but will
be continuing with creating the artifacts tomorrow!
Best,
Christo
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 at 12:31, Christo Lolov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have volunteered to be the release manager for the 4.0.1 release.
&
kafka/actions/runs/16501196196
Thanks,
Christo
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Queues+for+Kafka+%28KIP-932%29+-+Preview+Release+Notes
and I am able to produce and consume using the CLI tools without it?
I don't feel that my documentation-related queries are a blocker. As
such +1 (binding) for this release candidate from me :)
Best,
Christo
Christo Lolov created KAFKA-15267:
-
Summary: Cluster-wide disablement of Tiered Storage
Key: KAFKA-15267
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15267
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Sub
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
