yangkun created KAFKA-8750:
--
Summary: Utils#murmur2() method switch case block don't have break
Key: KAFKA-8750
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8750
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
Stanislav Kozlovski created KAFKA-8751:
--
Summary: Trogdor - Add endpoint that deletes all tasks
Key: KAFKA-8751
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8751
Project: Kafka
Issue
Alexandre Dupriez created KAFKA-8752:
Summary: Ensure plugin classes are instantiable when discovering
plugins
Key: KAFKA-8752
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8752
Project: Kafka
Hi,
I'd like to have a final try at getting some voting on this KIP. I'd like to
get it into Kafka 2.4 so get your votes in please.
Currently only +2 non-binding votes.
KIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-419%3A+Safely+notify+Kafka+Connect+SourceTask+is+stopped
PR: ht
Hey Colin,
I think this is a long-awaited KIP, thanks for driving it. I'm excited to
see this in Kafka once. I collected my questions (and I accept the "TBD"
answer as they might be a bit deep for this high level :) ).
1.) Are there any specific reasons for the Controller just periodically
persist
David Arthur created KAFKA-8753:
---
Summary: Add JMX for number of topics marked for deletion
Key: KAFKA-8753
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8753
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Impr
Thank you Guozhang for the reply! I'm curious whether KIP-429 has reflected
the latest change on ConsumerGroupMetadata? Also regarding question one,
the group metadata needs to be accessed via callback, does that mean we
need a separate producer API such like
"producer.refreshMetadata(groupMetadata
Hi Colin,
Thanks for the KIP.
Currently ZooKeeper provides a convenient notification mechanism for
knowing that broker and topic configuration has changed. While KIP-500 does
suggest that incremental metadata update is expected to come to clients
eventually, that would seem to imply that for some
Hello all, I'd like to start a discussion for
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-503%3A+Add+metric+for+number+of+topics+marked+for+deletion
Thanks!
David
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019, at 07:49, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote:
> Hey Colin,
>
> I think this is a long-awaited KIP, thanks for driving it. I'm excited to
> see this in Kafka once. I collected my questions (and I accept the "TBD"
> answer as they might be a bit deep for this high level :) ).
> 1.) Are t
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019, at 10:02, Tom Bentley wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> Currently ZooKeeper provides a convenient notification mechanism for
> knowing that broker and topic configuration has changed. While KIP-500 does
> suggest that incremental metadata update is expected to co
Stéphane Derosiaux created KAFKA-8754:
-
Summary: Connect API: Expose the list of available transformations
Key: KAFKA-8754
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8754
Project: Kafka
Thanks for the KIP. Its useful metric to have. LGTM.
-Harsha
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 11:24 AM, David Arthur
wrote:
> Hello all, I'd like to start a discussion for
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/
> KIP-503%3A+Add+metric+for+number+of+topics+marked+for+deletion
>
> Thanks!
I think it would be useful to have this in AdminClient. Especially if we
implement KIP-496: Administrative API to delete consumer offsets. It would be
odd to have a way to delete consumer offsets in AdminClient, but not to create
them. What do you think?
best,
Colin
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019, at
If my math is right, we have 3 non-binding +1 votes and 2 binding +1 votes.
This is a simple but really beneficial KIP for Connect. Can we get another
review and vote by a committer? Thanks!
Randall
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:37 PM sapie...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hey everyone, just bumping this thr
Hello folks,
I've also updated the wiki page by making the augmented
`ConsumerPartitionAssignor` out as a public API in `o.a.k.clients.consumer`
and deprecate the old `PartitionAssignor` as in
`o.a.k.clients.consumer.internals`.
Guozhang
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 11:30 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman
wro
Bruno Cadonna created KAFKA-8755:
Summary: Stand-by Task of an Optimized Source Table Does Not Write
Anything to its State Store
Key: KAFKA-8755
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8755
P
+1, non-binding
Ryanne
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:38 PM Randall Hauch wrote:
> If my math is right, we have 3 non-binding +1 votes and 2 binding +1 votes.
>
> This is a simple but really beneficial KIP for Connect. Can we get another
> review and vote by a committer? Thanks!
>
> Randall
>
> On Fr
okay I think I understand your concerns about ConsumerGroupMetadata now: if
we still want to only call initTxns once, then we should allow the whatever
passed-in parameter to reflect the latest value of generation id whenever
sending the offset fetch request.
Whereas the current ConsumerGroupMetad
Matthias J. Sax created KAFKA-8756:
--
Summary: Flaky Test
SaslSslAdminClientIntegrationTest#testIncrementalAlterConfigsForLog4jLogLevels
Key: KAFKA-8756
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8756
Matthias J. Sax created KAFKA-8757:
--
Summary: Flaky Test
SaslSslAdminClientIntegrationTest#testIncrementalAlterConfigsForLog4jLogLevelsCanResetLoggerToCurrentRoot
Key: KAFKA-8757
URL: https://issues.apache.org/ji
Hi all,
I made some changes to the KIP. Hopefully this configuration change will
make things a little clearer.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-487%3A+Client-side+Automatic+Topic+Creation+on+Producer
Please let me know if you have any feedback or questions!
Thank you,
Justin
Yep, Guozhang I think that would be best as passing in an entire consumer
instance is indeed cumbersome.
Just saw you updated KIP-429, I will follow-up to change 447 as well.
Best,
Boyang
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:18 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> okay I think I understand your concerns about Consum
Hi Justine,
Thanks for the KIP.
"When server-side auto-creation is disabled, client-side auto-creation will
try to use client-side configurations"
If I understand correctly, this KIP is removing any server-side blocking
client auto creation of topic?
if so this will present potential i
Harsha,
Rogue clients can use the admin client to create topics and partitions.
ACLs and policies can help in that case as well as this one.
Ismael
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019, 7:48 PM Harsha Chintalapani wrote:
> Hi Justine,
> Thanks for the KIP.
> "When server-side auto-creation is disa
This looks like a useful feature, the strategy makes sense, and the KIP is
thorough and nicely written. Thanks!
Cyrus
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, 12:40 PM Chris Egerton wrote:
> Thanks Arjun! Looks good to me.
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:33 PM Arjun Satish
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the feedback, Ch
26 matches
Mail list logo
