This thread might be of some use, it discusses the memory footprint when
using metrics:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/metrics-user/T68H70ea1Og
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Swapnil Ghike (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-656?page=com.atlassian.ji
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rebecca Sealfon resolved KAFKA-968.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I checked the repository and this seems to have been fixed.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13708177#comment-13708177
]
Joe Stein commented on KAFKA-974:
-
tried this with no luck, same error
diff --git a/projec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13708183#comment-13708183
]
Joe Stein commented on KAFKA-974:
-
well, as far as SBT goes
http://www.scala-sbt.org/relea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Stein updated KAFKA-974:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> can't use public release maven repo because of failure of downloa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Stein updated KAFKA-974:
Attachment: KAFKA-974.v2.patch
That last fix did work and attached patch
to use public maven
"org.apache.k
With SBT you can use 0.8.1-beta built with any of these four Scala versions
in libraryDependencies now
"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.9.2" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive()
or
"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.9.1" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive()
or
"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.8.2" % "0.8.0-beta1" in
SBT uses Maven Central as a default repository (local ivy too).
The artifacts are published to Maven Central so nothing you should have
to-do except to specify the libraryDependencies
In regards to 2.10.X support I took a really quick look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-717 (lots
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-717?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13708204#comment-13708204
]
Joe Stein commented on KAFKA-717:
-
looking at the simple patch not sure changing the scalaV
Thanks for doing this!
I'm wondering whether there is a reason to prefer one version of scala over
another, if we don't have any other particular scala dependency in our
code. Are the newer versions better/more efficient, some how? We've
essentially been using 2.8.0 so far, which seems to be fin
10 matches
Mail list logo