Thanks for doing this! I'm wondering whether there is a reason to prefer one version of scala over another, if we don't have any other particular scala dependency in our code. Are the newer versions better/more efficient, some how? We've essentially been using 2.8.0 so far, which seems to be fine (so I'm not particularly inclined to change, but I'm just curious).
One thing I notice, in the pom file, there are 2 dependencies listed for zookeeper, one of which has an exclusion clause, the other does not. I assume this is not intended: <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId> <artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId> <version>3.3.4</version> <exclusions> <exclusion> <groupId>log4j</groupId> <artifactId>log4j</artifactId> </exclusion> <exclusion> <groupId>jline</groupId> <artifactId>jline</artifactId> </exclusion> </exclusions> </dependency> and then <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.zookeeper</groupId> <artifactId>zookeeper</artifactId> <version>3.3.4</version> </dependency> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Joe Stein <crypt...@gmail.com> wrote: > SBT uses Maven Central as a default repository (local ivy too). > > The artifacts are published to Maven Central so nothing you should have > to-do except to specify the libraryDependencies > > In regards to 2.10.X support I took a really quick look at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-717 (lots to go through in > that > ticket it seems) will try some of the patch applys tomorrow and see how > they go. I would be in favor of it being part of the 0.8.0 final if it all > gets through and looks good and committing it to the 0.8 branch and not > only trunk but lets see first what is involved building 2.10.0, 2.10.1 and > 2.10.2 and what is going to take to get it working with the patches > submitted. > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:44 PM, chetan conikee <coni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Excellent > > > > What about the resolver ? sonatype, typeafe. maven artifactory ? > > Any plans for a 2.10+ compile as well > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Dima Gutzeit <gutz...@maaii.com> wrote: > > > > > What about the "newer" (not so new anymore) scala version 2.10.0 and > up ? > > > When will it be supported officially ? > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Dima Gutzeit. > > > > > > > > > On 15/7/13 9:32 AM, "Joe Stein" <crypt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >With SBT you can use 0.8.1-beta built with any of these four Scala > > > >versions > > > >in libraryDependencies now > > > > > > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.9.2" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() > > > > > > > >or > > > > > > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.9.1" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() > > > > > > > >or > > > > > > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.8.2" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() > > > > > > > >or > > > > > > > >"org.apache.kafka" % "kafka_2.8.0" % "0.8.0-beta1" intransitive() > > > > > > > > > > > >/* > > > >Joe Stein > > > >http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc > > > >Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> > > > >*/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > /* > Joe Stein > http://www.linkedin.com/in/charmalloc > Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> > */ >
