> On March 6, 2014, 5:37 p.m., Jun Rao wrote:
> > Could you test that works on both mac and linux?
>
> Martin Kleppmann wrote:
> Jun: yes, I've tested both on Mac OS 10.8.5 and Ubuntu 12.04. The
> behavior is the same on both: the nohup'ed process ignores SIGINT, but shuts
> down correctly
> On March 6, 2014, 5:37 p.m., Jun Rao wrote:
> > Could you test that works on both mac and linux?
>
> Martin Kleppmann wrote:
> Jun: yes, I've tested both on Mac OS 10.8.5 and Ubuntu 12.04. The
> behavior is the same on both: the nohup'ed process ignores SIGINT, but shuts
> down correctly
> On March 6, 2014, 5:37 p.m., Jun Rao wrote:
> > Could you test that works on both mac and linux?
>
> Martin Kleppmann wrote:
> Jun: yes, I've tested both on Mac OS 10.8.5 and Ubuntu 12.04. The
> behavior is the same on both: the nohup'ed process ignores SIGINT, but shuts
> down correctly
> On March 6, 2014, 5:37 p.m., Jun Rao wrote:
> > Could you test that works on both mac and linux?
Jun: yes, I've tested both on Mac OS 10.8.5 and Ubuntu 12.04. The behavior is
the same on both: the nohup'ed process ignores SIGINT, but shuts down correctly
on SIGTERM.
- Martin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18846/#review36371
---
Could you test that works on both mac and linux?
- Jun Rao
On Mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18846/#review36368
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Neha Narkhede
On March 6, 2014, 3:26 p.m., M
