Hi all,
I would like thank you all of you for participating in the voting process.
After being open for 11 days, we have received the necessary votes to proceed,
and I am now closing the voting process. KIP-937 has been accepted with 3
binding votes from Luke Chen, Divij Vaidya, and Justine Ols
Hey Mehari,
Yes. The KIP looks good to me. +1 (binding)
Justine
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:13 PM Beyene, Mehari
wrote:
> Hi Justine/All,
>
> I want to wrap up this voting process in the next day or so. Justine,
> since you gave a conditional binding vote regarding updating the error
> message,
Hi Justine/All,
I want to wrap up this voting process in the next day or so. Justine, since you
gave a conditional binding vote regarding updating the error message, I want to
circle back and verify that you're happy with the current state of the changes
before concluding the voting process.
T
+1 (non-binding) from me as well! This is the type of problem which is
difficult to become aware of so the more guardrails we put into place the
better.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 at 23:30, Beyene, Mehari
wrote:
> Thank you, Justin. That makes sense.
> I have updated the KIP to remove the concept of ah
Thank you, Justin. That makes sense.
I have updated the KIP to remove the concept of ahead/behind. Instead, we will
use the existing error message that utilizes the acceptable range for the
timestamps.
Thanks,
Mehari
Hey Mehari,
Thanks for the KIP. One minor change is now that we have the before and
after configs does this error make sense?
> we will return error code 32 (INVALID_TIMESTAMP) with the error message
"Timestamp of the message with offset [record offset] is ahead of the
broker's current time."
I
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Andrew
> On 19 Jun 2023, at 11:42, Divij Vaidya wrote:
>
> This KIP solves a real operational pain point for the administrator of
> Kafka cluster.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> --
> Divij Vaidya
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 5:09 AM Kirk True wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Mehari!
> On Jun 16, 2023, at 6:29 PM, Luke Chen wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) from me.
>
> Thanks.
> Luke
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:55 PM Beyene, Mehari
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I am opening the Volte on KIP-937 here. If we have more to discuss, please
>>
+1 (binding) from me.
Thanks.
Luke
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:55 PM Beyene, Mehari
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am opening the Volte on KIP-937 here. If we have more to discuss, please
> continue the discussion on the existing thread at:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wdpw845q9f5rhf6tz9tdl
