Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-10 Thread Ismael Juma
+1 from me too. Thanks to everyone that voted and participated in the discussion. The KIP passed with 7 binding +1s (Sriram, Neha, Jason, Guozhang, Gwen, Jun, myself) and 2 non-binding +1s (Rajini, Grant). Ismael On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Jun Rao wrote: > Thanks for the writeup. +1. > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-08 Thread Jun Rao
Thanks for the writeup. +1. Jun On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id > > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Gwen Shapira
+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id > > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a g

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Guozhang Wang
+1. On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Jason Gustafson wrote: > +1 and thanks for the excellent write-up! > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:49 AM Grant Henke wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Jason Gustafson
+1 and thanks for the excellent write-up! On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:49 AM Grant Henke wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com > > > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Neha Narkhede
+1 (binding) On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 9:49 AM Grant Henke wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Rajini Sivaram < > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com > > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Sriram Subramanian > > wrote: > > > > > +1 binding > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Grant Henke
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Sriram Subramanian > wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > > On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I would like to (re)initiate[1] th

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-07 Thread Rajini Sivaram
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Sriram Subramanian wrote: > +1 binding > > > On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFK

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78 Cluster Id (second attempt)

2016-09-06 Thread Sriram Subramanian
+1 binding > On Sep 6, 2016, at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id > > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78: Cluster Id

2016-09-06 Thread Ismael Juma
Hi Jun, This is a new [VOTE] thread, you can see it in the archives: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w%40mail.gmail.com%3E I suspect Gmail is incorrectly placing it in the wrong thread (it did for me too,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78: Cluster Id

2016-09-06 Thread Jun Rao
Ismael, Could you move this to a new [VOTE] thread to make the voting clear? Thanks, Jun On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-78: Cluster Id: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78: Cluster Id

2016-09-06 Thread Gwen Shapira
+1 (binding) Thank you for the KIP and discussion. Looking forward to the PR and future improvements. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-78: Cluster Id: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%

Re: [VOTE] KIP-78: Cluster Id

2016-09-06 Thread Sriram Subramanian
+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-78: Cluster Id: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id > > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good fi