+1 from me too. Thanks to everyone that voted and participated in the discussion. The KIP passed with 7 binding +1s (Sriram, Neha, Jason, Guozhang, Gwen, Jun, myself) and 2 non-binding +1s (Rajini, Grant).
Ismael On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > Thanks for the writeup. +1. > > Jun > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to (re)initiate[1] the voting process for KIP-78 Cluster Id: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-78%3A+Cluster+Id > > > > As explained in the KIP and discussion thread, we see this as a good > first > > step that can serve as a foundation for future improvements. > > > > Thanks, > > Ismael > > > > [1] Even though I created a new vote thread, Gmail placed the messages in > > the discuss thread, making it not as visible as required. It's important > to > > mention that two +1s were cast by Gwen and Sriram: > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201609. > > mbox/%3CCAD5tkZbLv7fvH4q%2BKe%2B%3DJMgGq%2BZT2t34e0WRUsCT1ErhtKOg1w% > > 40mail.gmail.com%3E > > >
