Sure, now we have 5 binding +1 votes and 2 non-biding +1 votes. Since we
have more than three binding votes and no -1 votes, I guess KIP-324 is
accepted? If so, I will then update the PR and the wiki.
P.S. Guozhang, is this still needs to be worked on?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6
Yes, please feel free to conclude this thread with a tally.
Guozhang
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:53 AM Yishun Guan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since it has been 72 hrs. Should we go ahead and accept this KIP? Thanks.
>
> Best
> Yishun
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 4:14 PM Yishun Guan wrote:
>
> > I see!
Hi All,
Since it has been 72 hrs. Should we go ahead and accept this KIP? Thanks.
Best
Yishun
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 4:14 PM Yishun Guan wrote:
> I see! Thanks. -Yishun
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 4:10 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
>> Hi Yishun,
>>
>> We need to wait at least 72 business hours with
I see! Thanks. -Yishun
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 4:10 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Hi Yishun,
>
> We need to wait at least 72 business hours with three binding votes,
> although you already have enough votes (me, Matthias, Damian) we still need
> to wait enough hours for people to take a look and see i
Hi Yishun,
We need to wait at least 72 business hours with three binding votes,
although you already have enough votes (me, Matthias, Damian) we still need
to wait enough hours for people to take a look and see if they have any
different opinions.
After 72 hours have passed since you started the
Added! Thank you Colin. Do we now have enough votes? I read the bylaws and
still a little bit confused. Thanks. - Yishun
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> P.S. +1 (non-binding) once you add the info about it being thread-safe.
>
> best,
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, at 15:23,
P.S. +1 (non-binding) once you add the info about it being thread-safe.
best,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, at 15:23, Colin McCabe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 13:24, Yishun Guan wrote:
> > Hi Colin,
> >
> > I agree with what Guozhang's opinion that because all the other clients
> > have it (prod
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 13:24, Yishun Guan wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> I agree with what Guozhang's opinion that because all the other clients
> have it (producer, consumer..) and this will gain more visibility for those
> application that use admin client. (Now I added this sentence to the KIP)
I ag
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Harsha
On Wed, Jun 27th, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
>
>
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 at 18:50 Bill Bejeck < bbej...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:47 PM Manikumar < manikumar.re...@gma
+1 (binding)
Thanks
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 at 18:50 Bill Bejeck wrote:
> +1
>
> -Bill
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:47 PM Manikumar
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:15 PM Matthias J. Sax
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On 6/26/18 2
+1
-Bill
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:47 PM Manikumar
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:15 PM Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 6/26/18 2:33 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > > +1. Thanks.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Yishun Guan
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:15 PM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 6/26/18 2:33 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > +1. Thanks.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Yishun Guan wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I am starting a vote on this KIP:
> >>
> >> https:
+1 (binding)
On 6/26/18 2:33 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1. Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Yishun Guan wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am starting a vote on this KIP:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/lQg0BQ
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yishun
>>
>
>
>
signature.asc
Description: O
+1. Thanks.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Yishun Guan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am starting a vote on this KIP:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/lQg0BQ
>
> Thanks,
> Yishun
>
--
-- Guozhang
Hi Colin,
I agree with what Guozhang's opinion that because all the other clients
have it (producer, consumer..) and this will gain more visibility for those
application that use admin client. (Now I added this sentence to the KIP)
Since this returns an unmodifiableMap(like all the other client's
Can you add a little more explanation to the KIP for why you are adding this
method? Is it something streams needs, for example? Will it help other
applications that use admin client and want to expose metrics?
What are the thread-safety guarantees for the map which is returned?
best,
Colin
16 matches
Mail list logo
