Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-23 Thread Ismael Juma
Hi all, During PR review a few minor improvements to the KIP were suggested: 1. Rename TopicDetails to RequestMetadata and make it an inner class of the CreateTopicPolicy interface. By using a more generic name, we have more flexibility with regards to additional data we may want to pass to the p

Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-11 Thread Ismael Juma
Thanks to everyone who voted and provided feedback. The vote has passed with 4 binding +1s (Joel, Gwen, Neha, Sriram) and 4 non-binding +1s (Edoardo, Roger, Jon, Apurva). I have updated the relevant wiki pages. Ismael On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Sriram Subramanian wrote: > +1 > > On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-09 Thread Sriram Subramanian
+1 On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Apurva Mehta wrote: > (hit send too soon) > > +1 (non-binding).. that is a very well written KIP! > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Apurva Mehta wrote: > > > +1, that1 > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > > > >> +1 - thanks Ismael!

Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-09 Thread Apurva Mehta
(hit send too soon) +1 (non-binding).. that is a very well written KIP! On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Apurva Mehta wrote: > +1, that1 > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > >> +1 - thanks Ismael! >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:30 PM Gwen Shapira wrote: >> >> > +1 - thank

Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-09 Thread Apurva Mehta
+1, that1 On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > +1 - thanks Ismael! > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:30 PM Gwen Shapira wrote: > > > +1 - thanks for the proposal, I think it will be super useful for admins. > > > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > > Hi all, >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-09 Thread Neha Narkhede
+1 - thanks Ismael! On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:30 PM Gwen Shapira wrote: > +1 - thanks for the proposal, I think it will be super useful for admins. > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-09 Thread Gwen Shapira
+1 - thanks for the proposal, I think it will be super useful for admins. On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Hi all, > > As the discussion seems to have settled down, I would like to initiate the > voting process for KIP-108: Create Topic Policy: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/con

Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-09 Thread Jon Chiu
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Joel Koshy wrote: > +1 > > Thanks for the KIP - this is a very useful feature. > > Thanks, > > Joel > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Edoardo Comar wrote: > > > Ismael, > > thanks for the KIP I see it as quite useful in a managed cloud > > envi

Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-09 Thread Joel Koshy
+1 Thanks for the KIP - this is a very useful feature. Thanks, Joel On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Edoardo Comar wrote: > Ismael, > thanks for the KIP I see it as quite useful in a managed cloud > environment. > > +1 (non-binding) > -- > Edoard

Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-09 Thread Roger Hoover
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:15 AM, Edoardo Comar wrote: > Ismael, > thanks for the KIP I see it as quite useful in a managed cloud > environment. > > +1 (non-binding) > -- > Edoardo Comar > IBM MessageHub > eco...@uk.ibm.com > IBM UK

Re: [VOTE] KIP-108: Create Topic Policy

2017-01-09 Thread Edoardo Comar
Ismael, thanks for the KIP I see it as quite useful in a managed cloud environment. +1 (non-binding) -- Edoardo Comar IBM MessageHub eco...@uk.ibm.com IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales wi