It's now been a few weeks without any feedback. If I don't see
anything new, I'll start a vote early next week.
Thanks
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:00 PM Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback Edo.
>
> 1) While the initial name was matching the Protocol, I agree it was
> not great for u
Thanks for the feedback Edo.
1) While the initial name was matching the Protocol, I agree it was
not great for users. I've updated commitOffsets() to
commitConsumerGroupOffsets() as suggested.
2) I thought passing the timestamp for each partition would make it
harder to use in the most common cas
Thanks for the KIP Mickael!
two initial observations
`commitOffsets` methods could be renamed to `commitConsumerGroupOffsets`
to better match the existing `listConsumerGroupOffsets`
`ListOffsetsOptions` offers you a per-request isolation level option and
timestamp, but timestamp is a per-parti
