>
> > Jamie
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael K. Edwards
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Sent: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 20:50
> > Subject: Re: Preferred Partition Leaders
> >
> > I have clients with a similar need relating to disaster reco
gt; Jamie
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael K. Edwards
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 20:50
> Subject: Re: Preferred Partition Leaders
>
> I have clients with a similar need relating to disaster recovery. (Three
> replicas per partitio
, 14 Apr 2020 20:50
Subject: Re: Preferred Partition Leaders
I have clients with a similar need relating to disaster recovery. (Three
replicas per partition within a data center / AWS AZ/region, fourth replica
elsewhere, ineligible to become the partition leader without manual
intervention.)
On Tue
I have clients with a similar need relating to disaster recovery. (Three
replicas per partition within a data center / AWS AZ/region, fourth replica
elsewhere, ineligible to become the partition leader without manual
intervention.)
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:31 PM Łukasz Antoniak
wrote:
> Hi Ev
Hi Everyone,
Recently I came across Kafka setup where two data centers are close to each
other, but the company could not find a suitable place for the third one.
As a result third DC is little further, lower network throughput, but still
within range of decent network latency, qualifying for stre
