Thanks Divij.
I will start creating KIP offline for now and share it with you when ready.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 22:23 Divij Vaidya wrote:
> cc: PMC
>
> Hey Arpit
>
> We are currently facing a problem with adding new users to the confluence
> wiki which Apache Kafka uses to maintain KIPs. We are w
cc: PMC
Hey Arpit
We are currently facing a problem with adding new users to the confluence
wiki which Apache Kafka uses to maintain KIPs. We are working with Apache
Infrastructure on a resolution -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25451
If this is blocking you, we have two options. Y
+ @Kamal Chandraprakash @Vaidya, Divij
Can you help me setting up the wiki id for the
confluence.
Thanks and Regards
Arpit Goyal
8861094754
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 9:27 PM Arpit Goyal wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I want to start contributing to KIP but I am unable to login with the jira
> credentials
Hi Team,
I want to start contributing to KIP but I am unable to login with the jira
credentials.
Can somebody help with the process?
Jira userid is : goyarpit.
[image: Screenshot 2024-03-07 at 9.27.03 PM.png]
Thanks and Regards
Arpit Goyal
8861094754
Hello, Knowles.
I have some frustration with KIP process, also.
Some features, that at glance requested by the community just can’t be done
without explicit commiters approval.
KIP-729 [1], KIP-686 [2], request the same feature, can be taken as a good
example.
Dear Kafka committers, what kind
Good morning Knowles,
Thank you for sharing this feedback. I think your frustration is well founded.
I think most/all of the active committers carry around a sense of guilt about
KIPs that we haven’t been able to review.
We do have a responsibility to hold auditable, public design discussions b
Good morning,
The current process of KIPs needs to be improved. There are at least a
handful of open KIPs with existing PRs that are in a purgatory state. I
understand that people are busy, but if you are going to gatekeep Kafka
with this process, then it must be responsive. Even if the community
I'm very curious how the process will work for your community.
If you will be able to drop by with feedback in few month, I will
greatly appreciate. Processes can always be improved and a fresh set
of eyes on the KIP process can be useful
Gwen
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Aljoscha Kr
Thanks, appreciate it! :-)
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 at 17:21 Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi Aljoscha,
>
> Thanks for sharing your intention to use a process similar to our KIP
> process. You are more than welcome to copy the structures and docs that we
> have for the KIP process. :)
>
&
Hi Aljoscha,
Thanks for sharing your intention to use a process similar to our KIP
process. You are more than welcome to copy the structures and docs that we
have for the KIP process. :)
Ismael
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
wrote:
> Hi Kafka Community,
> I'm a me
Hi Kafka Community,
I'm a member of the Flink community and I would like to ask if you're okay
with us using your KIP process for Flink. We are at a stage where we have
to be more careful in planning big feature additions to Flink and are
looking for ways to formalize our processes the
ad through the KIP process[1] and have three specific questions:
>
>1. I notice that the voting is executed using "Lazy Majority"[2].
>However, I was surprised that "Lazy Majority" doesn't stipulate a time
> for
>how long a voting process will g
Hi,
I just read through the KIP process[1] and have three specific questions:
1. I notice that the voting is executed using "Lazy Majority"[2].
However, I was surprised that "Lazy Majority" doesn't stipulate a time for
how long a voting process will go on. I as
13 matches
Mail list logo
