I'm very curious how the process will work for your community. If you will be able to drop by with feedback in few month, I will greatly appreciate. Processes can always be improved and a fresh set of eyes on the KIP process can be useful
Gwen On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks, appreciate it! :-) > > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 at 17:21 Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > >> Hi Aljoscha, >> >> Thanks for sharing your intention to use a process similar to our KIP >> process. You are more than welcome to copy the structures and docs that we >> have for the KIP process. :) >> >> Ismael >> >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Kafka Community, >> > I'm a member of the Flink community and I would like to ask if you're >> okay >> > with us using your KIP process for Flink. We are at a stage where we have >> > to be more careful in planning big feature additions to Flink and are >> > looking for ways to formalize our processes there. I feel we don't have >> to >> > reinvent the wheel if other projects already put thought into this and >> > established a process that works. >> > >> > So, would you be okay with us copying the structures and docs that you >> have >> > in place for the KIP process? With adaptions to suit Flink, of course. >> > >> > Best, >> > Aljoscha >> > >>
