Re: [VOTE] KIP-891: Running multiple versions of Connector plugins

2024-10-27 Thread Snehashis
Thanks everyone, Have moved the status of the KIP to Accepted and updated the docs appropriately. Regards Snehashis On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 9:27 PM Mickael Maison wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding), thanks for the KIP! > > Mickael > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:35 PM Greg Harris > wrote: > > > > H

Re: [VOTE] KIP-891: Running multiple versions of Connector plugins

2024-10-23 Thread Mickael Maison
Hi, +1 (binding), thanks for the KIP! Mickael On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:35 PM Greg Harris wrote: > > Hi all, > > Bumping this thread in advance of the November 20th KIP freeze for 4.0. > > Thanks! > Greg > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 5:03 AM Snehashis wrote: > > > Thanks Greg, Chris and Ashwin >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-891: Running multiple versions of Connector plugins

2024-10-22 Thread Greg Harris
Hi all, Bumping this thread in advance of the November 20th KIP freeze for 4.0. Thanks! Greg On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 5:03 AM Snehashis wrote: > Thanks Greg, Chris and Ashwin > > For the individual queries, > > 1. The example is incorrect and both should be treated as exact versions. > Thanks fo

Re: [VOTE] KIP-891: Running multiple versions of Connector plugins

2024-10-08 Thread Snehashis
Thanks Greg, Chris and Ashwin For the individual queries, 1. The example is incorrect and both should be treated as exact versions. Thanks for pointing that out. 2. I can see a converter/transformation having a version property but it's probably not likely. That said I don't see why we should not

Re: [VOTE] KIP-891: Running multiple versions of Connector plugins

2024-10-07 Thread Ashwin
Hi Snehasis, Thanks for the KIP - +1 (non-binding) I just had a question regarding the sample config in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=235834793#KIP891:RunningmultipleversionsofConnectorplugins-Configuration > "connector.version": "3.8" > "transforms.flatten-ol

Re: [VOTE] KIP-891: Running multiple versions of Connector plugins

2024-10-07 Thread Chris Egerton
Hi Snehashis, Thanks for the KIP. I'm +1 (binding) but have one more non-blocking thought I wanted to share. On the off chance that an existing plugin is designed to accept a "version" property, could we either 1) keep passing that property to plugins instead of stripping it, or 2) rename our new

Re: [VOTE] KIP-891: Running multiple versions of Connector plugins

2024-10-07 Thread Greg Harris
Hey Snehashis, Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding) Greg On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:14 PM Snehashis wrote: > Hi everyone > > I would like to call a vote for KIP-891. Please take a moment to review the > proposal and submit your vote. Special thanks to Greg who helped to expand > this to make it muc

[VOTE] KIP-891: Running multiple versions of Connector plugins

2024-10-04 Thread Snehashis
Hi everyone I would like to call a vote for KIP-891. Please take a moment to review the proposal and submit your vote. Special thanks to Greg who helped to expand this to make it much more broadly useful, and everyone else who participated in both discussion threads. KIP KIP-891: Running multiple