Thanks everyone,
Have moved the status of the KIP to Accepted and updated the docs
appropriately.
Regards
Snehashis
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 9:27 PM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding), thanks for the KIP!
>
> Mickael
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:35 PM Greg Harris
> wrote:
> >
> > H
Hi,
+1 (binding), thanks for the KIP!
Mickael
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:35 PM Greg Harris
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Bumping this thread in advance of the November 20th KIP freeze for 4.0.
>
> Thanks!
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 5:03 AM Snehashis wrote:
>
> > Thanks Greg, Chris and Ashwin
>
Hi all,
Bumping this thread in advance of the November 20th KIP freeze for 4.0.
Thanks!
Greg
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 5:03 AM Snehashis wrote:
> Thanks Greg, Chris and Ashwin
>
> For the individual queries,
>
> 1. The example is incorrect and both should be treated as exact versions.
> Thanks fo
Thanks Greg, Chris and Ashwin
For the individual queries,
1. The example is incorrect and both should be treated as exact versions.
Thanks for pointing that out.
2. I can see a converter/transformation having a version property but it's
probably not likely. That said I don't see why we should not
Hi Snehasis,
Thanks for the KIP - +1 (non-binding)
I just had a question regarding the sample config in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=235834793#KIP891:RunningmultipleversionsofConnectorplugins-Configuration
> "connector.version": "3.8"
> "transforms.flatten-ol
Hi Snehashis,
Thanks for the KIP. I'm +1 (binding) but have one more non-blocking thought
I wanted to share.
On the off chance that an existing plugin is designed to accept a "version"
property, could we either 1) keep passing that property to plugins instead
of stripping it, or 2) rename our new
Hey Snehashis,
Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding)
Greg
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:14 PM Snehashis wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I would like to call a vote for KIP-891. Please take a moment to review the
> proposal and submit your vote. Special thanks to Greg who helped to expand
> this to make it muc
Hi everyone
I would like to call a vote for KIP-891. Please take a moment to review the
proposal and submit your vote. Special thanks to Greg who helped to expand
this to make it much more broadly useful, and everyone else who
participated in both discussion threads.
KIP
KIP-891: Running multiple