Thanks everyone, Have moved the status of the KIP to Accepted and updated the docs appropriately.
Regards Snehashis On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 9:27 PM Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > +1 (binding), thanks for the KIP! > > Mickael > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:35 PM Greg Harris > <greg.har...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Bumping this thread in advance of the November 20th KIP freeze for 4.0. > > > > Thanks! > > Greg > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 5:03 AM Snehashis <snehashisp1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Greg, Chris and Ashwin > > > > > > For the individual queries, > > > > > > 1. The example is incorrect and both should be treated as exact > versions. > > > Thanks for pointing that out. > > > 2. I can see a converter/transformation having a version property but > it's > > > probably not likely. That said I don't see why we should not use > > > plugin.version to make this more specific and avoid encountering this > in > > > the first place. > > > > > > Will make the appropriate changes to the KIP to include these two > points. > > > Thanks > > > Snehashis > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 10:33 AM Ashwin <apan...@confluent.io.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Snehasis, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP - +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > I just had a question regarding the sample config in > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=235834793#KIP891:RunningmultipleversionsofConnectorplugins-Configuration > > > > > > > > > "connector.version": "3.8" > > > > > "transforms.flatten-old.version": "3.8.0" > > > > > > > > How will the feature be implemented so that first config treated as > an > > > > exact version requirement, while the second one is a > > > > "use-only-if-you-have-it" version ? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ashwin > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:19 AM Chris Egerton < > fearthecel...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Snehashis, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP. I'm +1 (binding) but have one more non-blocking > > > > thought > > > > > I wanted to share. > > > > > > > > > > On the off chance that an existing plugin is designed to accept a > > > > "version" > > > > > property, could we either 1) keep passing that property to plugins > > > > instead > > > > > of stripping it, or 2) rename our new property to something like > > > > > "plugin.version"? > > > > > > > > > > Feel free to close the vote (if/when it gets a third binding+1) > without > > > > > addressing this if you believe the tradeoffs with the existing > design > > > are > > > > > superior. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, 11:22 Greg Harris > <greg.har...@aiven.io.invalid> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Snehashis, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP! +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > Greg > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 10:14 PM Snehashis < > snehashisp1...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to call a vote for KIP-891. Please take a moment > to > > > > review > > > > > > the > > > > > > > proposal and submit your vote. Special thanks to Greg who > helped to > > > > > > expand > > > > > > > this to make it much more broadly useful, and everyone else who > > > > > > > participated in both discussion threads. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > KIP > > > > > > > KIP-891: Running multiple versions of Connector plugins - > Apache > > > > Kafka > > > > > - > > > > > > > Apache Software Foundation > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-891%3A+Running+multiple+versions+of+Connector+plugins > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Snehashis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
