Hi Colin,
Sorry, I probably should've updated the thread, but that's indeed what we
did.
Cheers,
Tom
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 12:25 AM Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> We don't want to break source code compatibility, so I think we should
> avoid removing this exception.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
Hi Tom,
We don't want to break source code compatibility, so I think we should avoid
removing this exception.
best,
Colin
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, at 06:00, Tom Bentley wrote:
> During code review Chia-Ping noticed that the `throws InterruptedException`
> clause on the declaration of KafkaFuture#g
During code review Chia-Ping noticed that the `throws InterruptedException`
clause on the declaration of KafkaFuture#getNow() is not needed. We propose
to remove it. Note that removing it is not a source compatible change since
existing code which caught InterruptedException would get a compile err
Hi,
The vote passes with 4 binding +1s (Ismael, David Chia-Ping and Colin), and
1 non-binding +1 (Ryanne).
Many thanks to those who commented and/or voted.
Tom
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 8:21 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP.
>
> Colin
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, at 20:3
+1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP.
Colin
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, at 20:36, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> Thanks for this KIP. +1 (binding)
>
> On 2021/03/29 15:34:55, Tom Bentley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-707, which proposes to add
> > KafkaFuture.toCompletionStage(), de
Thanks for this KIP. +1 (binding)
On 2021/03/29 15:34:55, Tom Bentley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-707, which proposes to add
> KafkaFuture.toCompletionStage(), deprecate KafkaFuture.Function and make a
> couple of other minor cosmetic changes.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/
Thanks for the KIP, Tom. I agree that this is a good step forward.
+1 (binding)
David
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 5:58 PM Ryanne Dolan wrote:
> +1, thanks!
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021, 10:54 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding).
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at
+1, thanks!
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021, 10:54 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding).
>
> Ismael
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:35 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-707, which proposes to add
> > KafkaFuture.toCompletionStage(), deprecate KafkaFu
Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding).
Ismael
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:35 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-707, which proposes to add
> KafkaFuture.toCompletionStage(), deprecate KafkaFuture.Function and make a
> couple of other minor cosmetic changes.
>
>
> https://c
Hi,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-707, which proposes to add
KafkaFuture.toCompletionStage(), deprecate KafkaFuture.Function and make a
couple of other minor cosmetic changes.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-707%3A+The+future+of+KafkaFuture
Many thanks,
Tom
10 matches
Mail list logo
