A bit late on this thread, but I've reviewed the KIP and I'm also +1.
Thanks Tom. Happy to see this improvement making it in.
Konstantine
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:27 AM Tom Bentley wrote:
> With 3 binding +1 (Manikumar, Mickael and Rajini) and 2 non-binding +1
> (David and William) the vote p
With 3 binding +1 (Manikumar, Mickael and Rajini) and 2 non-binding +1
(David and William) the vote passes.
Thanks to all who voted.
Tom
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:39 PM Rajini Sivaram
wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP. Apart from being useful when using frameworks like
>
Hi Tom,
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP. Apart from being useful when using frameworks like
Kubernetes, it also seems like a neater way of storing complex
multi-line configs without embedding into a property file.
Regards,
Rajini
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:29 PM William Reynolds <
william.reyn
+1 (non binding) Looks like a good addition!
On 06/08/2020, Tom Bentley wrote:
> This pretty minor change has 2 binding and 1 non-binding votes. It would be
> great if more people could take a look and either vote or give feedback
> about how it should be improved.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Tom
>
> On
This pretty minor change has 2 binding and 1 non-binding votes. It would be
great if more people could take a look and either vote or give feedback
about how it should be improved.
Many thanks,
Tom
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:07 PM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Jul 8,
+1 (binding)
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:31 AM Manikumar wrote:
>
> +1 (bindig)
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:30 PM David Jacot wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'
+1 (bindig)
Thanks for the KIP.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:30 PM David Jacot wrote:
> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-632, which is about making the config
> > provider mechanism more
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-632, which is about making the config
> provider mechanism more ergonomic on Kubernetes:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-632%3A+Add+Direc
Hi,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-632, which is about making the config
provider mechanism more ergonomic on Kubernetes:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-632%3A+Add+DirectoryConfigProvider
Please take a look if you have time.
Many thanks,
Tom
