+1 (non binding) Looks like a good addition! On 06/08/2020, Tom Bentley <[email protected]> wrote: > This pretty minor change has 2 binding and 1 non-binding votes. It would be > great if more people could take a look and either vote or give feedback > about how it should be improved. > > Many thanks, > > Tom > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:07 PM Mickael Maison <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> Thanks >> >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:31 AM Manikumar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (bindig) >> > >> > Thanks for the KIP. >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:30 PM David Jacot <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:54 PM Tom Bentley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi, >> > > > >> > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-632, which is about making the >> > > > config >> > > > provider mechanism more ergonomic on Kubernetes: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-632%3A+Add+DirectoryConfigProvider >> > > > >> > > > Please take a look if you have time. >> > > > >> > > > Many thanks, >> > > > >> > > > Tom >> > > > >> > > >> >> >
-- *William Reynolds**Technical Operations Engineer* <https://www.facebook.com/instaclustr> <https://twitter.com/instaclustr> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/instaclustr> Read our latest technical blog posts here <https://www.instaclustr.com/blog/>. This email has been sent on behalf of Instaclustr Pty. Limited (Australia) and Instaclustr Inc (USA). This email and any attachments may contain confidential and legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy or disclose its content, but please reply to this email immediately and highlight the error to the sender and then immediately delete the message. Instaclustr values your privacy. Our privacy policy can be found at https://www.instaclustr.com/company/policies/privacy-policy
