Thanks for the feedback and votes. I updated the KIP to incorporate the
feedback. Since the changes were minor, I assume the existing votes still
stand. If you have any additional feedback, please do share. The KIP passes
with 6 binding +1s, 4 non-binding +1s and no -1s:
Binding +1s:
* Bill Bejeck
Hi Ewen,
Thanks for the feedback. I agree. I'll include the shim module for the
`core` jar in this KIP. I'll mention removing Scala versions altogether for
the `core` module as potential future work.
Ismael
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:14 PM Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> +1 (binding), though th
+1 (binding)
best,
Colin
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019, at 05:19, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> People seemed supportive in general, so I'd like to start a vote on KIP-531:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-531%3A+Drop+support+for+Scala+2.11+in+Kafka+2.5
>
> Ismael
>
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 22:14, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> +1 (binding), though there is definitely still some compatibility risk --
> regardless of updates, people are going to have apps that may need other
> updates but upgrading between scala versions is still too
+1 (binding), though there is definitely still some compatibility risk --
regardless of updates, people are going to have apps that may need other
updates but upgrading between scala versions is still too painful for too
long to warrant the effort to update. But in that case they probably aren't
up
+1 (binding)
Thanks for the KIP
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:54 PM Sean Glover wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Good idea. It will streamline the Streams Scala DSL nicely. It will also
> affect 2.11 users of embedded-kafka. Are there any other non-broker
> dependencies that could be affected?
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
Good idea. It will streamline the Streams Scala DSL nicely. It will also
affect 2.11 users of embedded-kafka. Are there any other non-broker
dependencies that could be affected?
Sean
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:43 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Yes, everyone is encouraged to vote.
Thanks, Ismael.
+1 (binding)
John
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:43 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> Yes, everyone is encouraged to vote. Committer votes are binding, but we
> are interested in what the wider community thinks too.
>
> Ismael
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ivan Yurchenko
> wrote:
>
>
Yes, everyone is encouraged to vote. Committer votes are binding, but we
are interested in what the wider community thinks too.
Ismael
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ivan Yurchenko
wrote:
> Do I understand correctly, that non-commiters can also vote, despite their
> votes don't decide?
>
> If
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:30 AM Satish Duggana
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding), Thanks Ismael for the KIP. I believe it is time to
> drop Scala 2.11.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 7:10 PM Ivan Yurchenko
> wrote:
> >
> > Do I understand correctly, that non-commiters can also vote, despite
+1 (non-binding), Thanks Ismael for the KIP. I believe it is time to
drop Scala 2.11.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 7:10 PM Ivan Yurchenko wrote:
>
> Do I understand correctly, that non-commiters can also vote, despite their
> votes don't decide?
>
> If so, then +1 from me.
>
> Ivan
>
>
> On Mon, 18 N
Do I understand correctly, that non-commiters can also vote, despite their
votes don't decide?
If so, then +1 from me.
Ivan
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 15:19, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> People seemed supportive in general, so I'd like to start a vote on
> KIP-531:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.
Hi all,
People seemed supportive in general, so I'd like to start a vote on KIP-531:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-531%3A+Drop+support+for+Scala+2.11+in+Kafka+2.5
Ismael
13 matches
Mail list logo
