Bumping this thread.
We are still missing binding votes.
Please take a look at the KIP
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-409%3A+Allow+creating+under-replicated+topics+and+partitions
and let me know if you have any feedback.
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 10:03 AM Mickael Maison
Bumping this thread once again.
So far we only have 4 non binding votes.
Please take a look at the KIP, share any feedback and consider voting.
Thanks
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:03 AM Ryanne Dolan wrote:
>
> Hey all, please consider voting for this KIP. It's really a shame that
> topic creation
Hey all, please consider voting for this KIP. It's really a shame that
topic creation is impossible when clusters are under-provisioned, which is
not uncommon in a dynamic environment like Kubernetes.
Ryanne
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:57 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> I have not seen any new feedba
I have not seen any new feedback nor votes.
Bumping this thread again
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:55 PM Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We are now at 4 non-binding votes but still no binding votes.
> I have not seen any outstanding questions in the DISCUSS thread. If
> you have any feedback, plea
Hi,
We are now at 4 non-binding votes but still no binding votes.
I have not seen any outstanding questions in the DISCUSS thread. If
you have any feedback, please let me know.
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 2:03 PM M. Manna wrote:
>
> MIckael,
>
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 14:01, Mickael Mai
MIckael,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 14:01, Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi Manna,
>
> In your example, the topic 'dummy' is not under replicated. It just
> has 1 replica. A topic under replicated is a topic with less ISRs than
> replicas.
>
> Having under replicated topics is relatively common in a Kaf
Hi Manna,
In your example, the topic 'dummy' is not under replicated. It just
has 1 replica. A topic under replicated is a topic with less ISRs than
replicas.
Having under replicated topics is relatively common in a Kafka
cluster, it happens everytime is broker is down. However Kafka does
not per
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:58 PM M. Manna wrote:
> Hi Mikael,
>
> Apologies for last minute question, as I just caught up with it. Thanks for
> your work on the KIP.
>
> Just trying to get your thoughts on one thing (I might have misunderstood
> it) - current
Hi Mikael,
Apologies for last minute question, as I just caught up with it. Thanks for
your work on the KIP.
Just trying to get your thoughts on one thing (I might have misunderstood
it) - currently it's possible (even though I am strongly against it) to
create Kafka topics which are under-replic
Hi all.
With 2.5.0 approaching, bumping this thread once more as feedback or
votes would be nice.
Thanks
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:59 PM Tom Bentley wrote:
>
> +1 non-binding. Thanks!
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:05 PM Sönke Liebau
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mickael,
> >
> > thanks for your response!
+1 non-binding. Thanks!
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:05 PM Sönke Liebau
wrote:
> Hi Mickael,
>
> thanks for your response! That all makes perfect sense and I cannot
> give any actual use cases for where what I asked about would be useful
> :)
> It was more the idle thought if this might be low hang
Hi Mickael,
thanks for your response! That all makes perfect sense and I cannot
give any actual use cases for where what I asked about would be useful
:)
It was more the idle thought if this might be low hanging fruit while
changing this anyway to avoid having to circle back later on and
wanted to
Thanks Sönke for the feedback.
I debated this point quite a bit before deciding to base creation
around "min.insync.replicas".
For me, the goal of this KIP is to enable administrators to provide
higher availability. In a 3 node cluster configured for high
availability (3 replicas, 2 min ISR), by
Hi Michael,
that sounds like a useful addition! I can't help but wonder whether by
leaving in the restriction that "min.insync.replicas" has to be
satisfied we'll be back here in a years time because someone has a
scenario where he or she wants to go below that :)
I don't have a strong opinion eit
+1 non-binding, thx
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:09 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Bumping this thread, I've not seen any votes or feedback.
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:17 PM Mickael Maison
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-409: Allow creating under-replicated
> > top
Bumping this thread, I've not seen any votes or feedback.
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:17 PM Mickael Maison
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-409: Allow creating under-replicated
> topics and partitions
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-409%3A+Allow+creati
Hi all,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-409: Allow creating under-replicated
topics and partitions
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-409%3A+Allow+creating+under-replicated+topics+and+partitions
Thanks
17 matches
Mail list logo
