Thanks everybody for voting. With 3 binding and 4 non-binding votes, I will
mark the KIP as accepted.
Thanks,
Allen
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 7:11 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> The incompatibility is unfortunate, but seems unlikely to cause a problem
> in practice. Let's ju
+1 (binding)
The incompatibility is unfortunate, but seems unlikely to cause a problem
in practice. Let's just make sure there's a note in the upgrade notes about
the incompatibility when we have a PR for this.
-Ewen
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Allen,
>
> Thanks for
Hi, Allen,
Thanks for the explanation. That's a great point. Could you add that to the
rejected section of the KIP. +1 on this KIP.
Jun
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Allen Wang wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> I think this KIP helps to gain insight into how many clients have been
> upgraded *before*
Hi Jun,
I think this KIP helps to gain insight into how many clients have been
upgraded *before* the we decide to upgrade the message format. In other
words, users will know if they will pay down conversion cost before message
format upgrade. It is about making an informed decision. To be
conserva
Hi, Allen,
Thanks for the KIP.
It seems the main motivation of the KIP is to estimate the ratio of the
clients doing down conversion. I am wondering if we can do that by relying
on the metrics we added in 1.0.0 (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-188+-+Add+new+metrics+to+suppo
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Thomas Crayford
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Mickael Maison <
> mickael.mai...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non binding)
> > > Thanks
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Mickael Maison >
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > Thanks for the KIP
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at
+1
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Mickael Maison
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
> Thanks for the KIP
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Allen Wang
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I would like to start voting for
+1 (non binding)
Thanks for the KIP
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Allen Wang wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to start voting for KIP-272: Add API version tag to broker's
>> RequestsPerSec metric.
>>
>> https://cwi
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Allen Wang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to start voting for KIP-272: Add API version tag to broker's
> RequestsPerSec metric.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 272%3A+Add+API+version+tag+to+broker%27s+RequestsPerSec+m
Hi All,
I would like to start voting for KIP-272: Add API version tag to broker's
RequestsPerSec metric.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-272%3A+Add+API+version+tag+to+broker%27s+RequestsPerSec+metric
Thanks,
Allen
11 matches
Mail list logo
