Re: [VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

Thanks for the votes, this is now adopted: Binding +1s: Joel, Neha, Sriram, Guozhang, Ismael Non-binding +1: Michael, Matthias, Bill, Damian. Eno > On 9 Jan 2017, at 22:04, Joel Koshy wrote: > > +1 > (although I added a minor comment on the discussion thread) > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:43 A

Re: [VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

+1 (although I added a minor comment on the discussion thread) On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:43 AM, Michael Noll wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Matthias J. Sax > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 1/6/17 9:09 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > +1 > > On 1/6/17 9:09 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:04 AM Sriram Subramanian > wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

+1 On 1/6/17 9:09 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:04 AM Sriram Subramanian wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Guozhang Wang >> wrote: >>> +1 On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at

Re: [VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

+1 On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:04 AM Sriram Subramanian wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Guozhang Wang > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Damian Guy > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

+1 On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Damian Guy wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 at 10:48 Ismael Juma wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, +1

Re: [VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

+1 On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Damian Guy wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 at 10:48 Ismael Juma wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Eno Th

Re: [VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

+1 On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Damian Guy wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 at 10:48 Ismael Juma wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). > > > > Ismael > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Eno Thereska > > wrote: > > > > > The discussion points for KIP-105 are addressed. At thi

Re: [VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

+1 On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 at 10:48 Ismael Juma wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). > > Ismael > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Eno Thereska > wrote: > > > The discussion points for KIP-105 are addressed. At this point we'd like > > to start the vote for it: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). Ismael On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Eno Thereska wrote: > The discussion points for KIP-105 are addressed. At this point we'd like > to start the vote for it: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > 105%3A+Addition+of+Record+Level+for+S

[VOTE] KIP-105: Addition of Record Level for Sensors

The discussion points for KIP-105 are addressed. At this point we'd like to start the vote for it: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-105%3A+Addition+of+Record+Level+for+Sensors