+1 On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:04 AM Sriram Subramanian <r...@confluent.io> wrote:
> +1 > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:55 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 at 10:48 Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding). > > > > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Eno Thereska < > > eno.there...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The discussion points for KIP-105 are addressed. At this point > we'd > > > > like > > > > > > to start the vote for it: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > > > 105%3A+Addition+of+Record+Level+for+Sensors < > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/ > > > > > > confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-105:+Addition+of+Record+Level+ > > > > for+Sensors> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Eno and Aarti > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -- Guozhang > > > > > > -- Thanks, Neha
