Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

Thanks, Israel. I agree with Gwen, this is a great list and would be useful to add to our release candidate boilerplate. Since we found a blocker bug on RC1, I'll go ahead and close voting. RC2 will be announced shortly. -David On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:46 AM Israel Ekpo wrote: > Thanks for th

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

Thanks for the feedback, Gwen. I will create JIRA tasks to track the items shortly. The JIRA tasks will document the goals, expectations and relevant Kafka versions for each resource. I will volunteer for some of them and update the JIRA tasks accordingly. On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:51 AM Gwen

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

Oh wow, I love this checklist. I don't think we'll have time to create one for this release, but will be great to track this via JIRA and see if we can get all those contributed before 2.6... Gwen Shapira Engineering Manager | Confluent 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap Follow us: Twitter | blog On Mon,

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

Thank you David. The fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9712 has now been merged to trunk and cherry-picked on the 2.5 branch. I hope this helps to unblock the next release candidate. Best, Konstantine On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 8:06 AM David Arthur wrote: > Thanks, Konstantine.

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

- Download artifacts successfully - Verified signatures successfully - All tests have passed so far for Scala 2.12. Have not run it on 2.13 yet +1 (non-binding) for the release I do have some feedback so I think we should include in the RC announcement a link for how the community sh

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

Thanks, Konstantine. After reviewing the Jira, It does seem like we should include a fix for this in 2.5. -David On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:55 AM Konstantine Karantasis < konstant...@confluent.io> wrote: > Hi David, > > after some broader testing with Kafka Connect, we've discovered > https://is

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

Hi David, after some broader testing with Kafka Connect, we've discovered https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9712 and I'd like to raise this issue as a potential blocker for 2.5.0. It seems to be a regression after a recent essential upgrade of the reflections library. The jira contains a

Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

Hi David, 1. Scanned the Javadoc, looks good 2. Downloaded kafka_2.12-2.5.0 and ran the quickstart and streams quickstart 3. Verified the signatures +1 (non-binding) Thanks for running the release David! -Bill On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 4:01 PM David Arthur wrote: > Thanks for the

Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

Thanks for the test failure reports, Tom. Tracking (and fixing) these is important and will make future release managers have an easier time :) -David On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:16 AM Tom Bentley wrote: > Hi David, > > I verified signatures, built the tagged branch and ran unit and integration

Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

Hi David, I verified signatures, built the tagged branch and ran unit and integration tests. I found some flaky tests, as follows: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9691 (new) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9692 (new) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9283 (alread

[VOTE] 2.5.0 RC1

Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, This is the second candidate for release of Apache Kafka 2.5.0. The first release candidate included an erroneous NOTICE file, so another RC was needed to fix that. This is a major release of Kafka which includes many new features, improvements