>
> Or do we also provide other binding jars for logback, log4j, simple etc ?
yep, that is a solution which kafka can have strong dependencies on those,
but we need to reach the consensus about "which" providers should be
included
Muralidhar Basani 於 2024年7月5日 週五
上午3:50寫道：
> Hi Chia,
> Thank y
Hi Chia,
Thank you for dropping by on this.
I have updated both the discussion thread and the Compatibility section
partly. But I would like to discuss a bit more about this and update.
3. how to keep the compatibility of updating slf4j version in the future?
According to slf4j compatibility (
ht
hi Muralidhar
thanks for writing the KIP. Please take a look at following comments:
1. please update the Discussion thread. it has incorrect link
2. please complete the section "Compatibility, Deprecation, and Migration
Plan". We had a good discussion in the PR (
https://github.com/apache/kafka
Hello,
Regarding KIP-1064 [0], I would like to start a discussion on upgrading
slf4j to 2.x, which is currently at 1.7.36, and with an option to
provide slf4j provider in run class.
This is also discussed in jira [1] and git pr [2], and thought we should
have a kip.
Please note this kip is inten
