Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 3.6.0 RC1

My apologies; both classes are in the server-common...-test jar. Both issues can be closed. From: Gary Russell Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 3:56 PM To: us...@kafka.apache.org ; dev Subject: Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 3.6.0 RC1 I have lowered the priority

Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 3.6.0 RC1

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15092 From: Gary Russell Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 3:36 PM To: us...@kafka.apache.org ; dev Subject: Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 3.6.0 RC1 This is a blocker for me [1]. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-

Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 3.6.0 RC1

This is a blocker for me [1]. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15482 From: Greg Harris Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 12:45 PM To: us...@kafka.apache.org Cc: dev ; kafka-clie...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 3.6.0 RC1 !!

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-15482) kafka.utils.TestUtils Depends on MockTime Which is Not in Any Jar

Gary Russell created KAFKA-15482: Summary: kafka.utils.TestUtils Depends on MockTime Which is Not in Any Jar Key: KAFKA-15482 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15482 Project: Kafka

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-15092) KafkaClusterTestKit in test jar depends on MockFaultHandler

Gary Russell created KAFKA-15092: Summary: KafkaClusterTestKit in test jar depends on MockFaultHandler Key: KAFKA-15092 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15092 Project: Kafka

Re: CVE Back Port?

the two most recent branches. The fix > is on the server side (broker and connect). I would encourage you to change > your rules since clients maintain compatibility for all public apis in > minor releases. > > Ismael > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 11:56 AM Gary Russell wrote: > >

CVE Back Port?

Is there any chance that the fix for this CVE [1] can be back ported (and released) on the 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7 branches? We have 3 (soon to be 4) supported branches, based on the 2.5.x, 2.6.x, 2.7.x, (and soon 3.0.0) clients. Our versioning rules forbid moving to a new minor release for a dependen

Re: [Suspected Spam] Re: [VOTE] 3.0.0 RC1

This [1] is a blocker for me. Also, the documentation link [2] returns a 404. [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13262 [2]: https://kafka.apache.org/30/documentation.html From: Ron Dagostino Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 9:16 PM To: dev@kafka.ap

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13262) Mock Clients Now Have Final close() Methods

Gary Russell created KAFKA-13262: Summary: Mock Clients Now Have Final close() Methods Key: KAFKA-13262 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13262 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13147) connection-close-total Metric Keeps Incrementing While Broker Down

Gary Russell created KAFKA-13147: Summary: connection-close-total Metric Keeps Incrementing While Broker Down Key: KAFKA-13147 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13147 Project: Kafka

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13054) Unexpected Polling Behavior

Gary Russell created KAFKA-13054: Summary: Unexpected Polling Behavior Key: KAFKA-13054 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13054 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Improvement

Re: 2.7.1 Status

7;m not mistaken, you can expect a release later this week. Cheerio... -Original Message- From: Gary Russell Sent: Wednesday, May 12th, 2021 10:31 PM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: 2.7.1 Status I have seen votes on 2.7.1-RC2 as recently as May 6 and it is not mentioned on the do

2.7.1 Status

I have seen votes on 2.7.1-RC2 as recently as May 6 and it is not mentioned on the downloads page; however, there is a version in Maven Central dated 4/8. Exactly what is the status of this release? Thanks.

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-732: Deprecate eos-alpha and replace eos-beta with eos-v2

. > > > > I don't have a strong opinion either way, so unless anyone objects I'll > add > > this deprecation to the KIP > > as well: > > > > @Deprecated > > public void sendOffsetsToTransaction(Map OffsetAndMetadata> > > offsets, String

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-732: Deprecate eos-alpha and replace eos-beta with eos-v2

Sophie, Why not also deprecate Producer.sendOffsetsToTransaction​ method variant with the consumerGroupId​ parameter? This would encourage non-Streams EOS users to move to beta/v2 implementations, and the fallback to alpha/v1 mode code can also be removed in 4.0. ___

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-12535) Consider Revising Document Anchors for Properties

Gary Russell created KAFKA-12535: Summary: Consider Revising Document Anchors for Properties Key: KAFKA-12535 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12535 Project: Kafka Issue Type

2.6.2

Any update on this release? I can't seem to find the [VOTE] thread in the archive, but I am sure I saw one. Thanks.

Re: Client/Broker Compatibility Matrix

I don't have sufficient knowledge to do that. From: Matthias J. Sax Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 6:57 PM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: Client/Broker Compatibility Matrix Feel free to edit the wiki page directly. On 2/18/21 11:19 AM, Gary Ru

Client/Broker Compatibility Matrix

You guys have done a great job enabling mixed client/broker compatibility since the early days, before 0.10.x.x Are there any plans to bring the matrix [1] up-to-date? Even just adding "any broker > 1.0.0 - Java: any version" (if that's true) would be helpful. TIA [1]: https://cwiki.apache.or

Re: 2.6.1 Critical Regression

wrote: > Hi Gary, > > Thanks for raising this. Looking at the PR, the change is in kafka streams, > not clients? > > Ismael > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 12:39 PM Gary Russell wrote: > > > A critical regression was included in kafka-clients 2.6.1, which is now > &

2.6.1 Critical Regression

A critical regression was included in kafka-clients 2.6.1, which is now fixed and cherry picked [1]. For some devs, it is not easy (or they are not allowed by their enterprise) to move up to a new release, even a minor release (2.7). Devs are often allowed to upgrade to patch releases without a

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.8.0 release

Can you add a link to the summary page [1]? I always start there. Thanks [1]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Future+release+plan Future release plan - Apache Kafka - Apache Software Foundation Release Plan

Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Kafka version 2.6.1

Thanks; it would be greatly appreciated if this can happen before Jan 14 at the latest. From: Mickael Maison Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 11:29 AM To: dev ; Users ; kafka-clients Subject: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Kafka version 2.6.1 This vote passes with 3 +

[VOTE] 2.6.1 RC3

Any news on this? Would it be possible to get it out before Jan 14? Thanks.

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10790) Detect/Prevent Deadlock on Producer Network Thread

Gary Russell created KAFKA-10790: Summary: Detect/Prevent Deadlock on Producer Network Thread Key: KAFKA-10790 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10790 Project: Kafka Issue

Re: [VOTE] 2.6.1 RC2

I am seeing this on every consumer start: 2020-11-25 13:54:34.858 INFO 42250 --- [ntainer#0-0-C-1] o.a.k.c.c.internals.AbstractCoordinator : [Consumer clientId=consumer-ktest26int-1, groupId=ktest26int] Rebalance failed. org.apache.kafka.common.errors.MemberIdRequiredException: The group memb

Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.1 RC1

Sorry for the noise; I just built the clients from the 2.6 branch and it's fixed. From: Gary Russell Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 3:00 PM To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.1 RC1 Oh; sorry; no, I didn't try the RC;

Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.1 RC1

ka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.1 RC1 Hi Gary, We also fixed the issue in 2.6.1 by removing the code that required jackson-databind in that branch. Have you tried the RC and still ran into the same issue? Ismael On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 11:08 AM Gary Russell wrote: > I am not suggesting back-porting

Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.1 RC1

em to be a blocker. If we keep canceling the vote based on non-blocker bugs (or delay a new RC until it's back ported), we will never ship a bug fix release. Thus, I think we should just move forward without backporting. -Matthias On 11/24/20 8:04 AM, Gary Russell wrote: > Is there a possi

Re: [kafka-clients] [VOTE] 2.6.1 RC1

Is there a possibility of removing the provided scope from the jackson databind dependency in 2.6.1? This is fixed in 2.7.0 [1], but it's a pain to have to add it manually for 2.6.0. [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10384?focusedCommentId=17238230&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10683) Consumer.position() Ignores Transaction Marker with read_uncommitted

Gary Russell created KAFKA-10683: Summary: Consumer.position() Ignores Transaction Marker with read_uncommitted Key: KAFKA-10683 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10683 Project: Kafka

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.7.0 release

Can someone add a link to the release plan page [1] to the Future Releases page [2]? I have the latter bookmarked. Thanks. [1]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=158872629 [2]: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Future+release+plan _

Re: [VOTE] 2.6.0 RC0

Docs link [1] is broken. [1] https://kafka.apache.org/26/documentation.html From: Randall Hauch Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 4:57 PM To: dev ; Users ; kafka-clients Subject: [VOTE] 2.6.0 RC0 Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, This is the fir

Re: 2.5.0 Producer.sendOffsetsToTransaction() and Backwards Compatibility

rade would > require two rolling bounce, first to enable upgrade mode, second to > enable the new feature. > > > -Matthias > > On 4/6/20 12:10 PM, Gary Russell wrote: > > Thanks, all, > > > >> Just to clarify, even for Streams client it cannot detect automaticall

Re: 2.5.0 Producer.sendOffsetsToTransaction() and Backwards Compatibility

and > > > > not violating our public agreement. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 7:44 PM Matthias J. Sax > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I guess you would need to catch the exception and retry? > > > &

Re: 2.5.0 Producer.sendOffsetsToTransaction() and Backwards Compatibility

precated. Hence, why do you want/need to switch to the newer > overload that only works for 2.5+ brokers? For many/most cases, the > "old" API that is compatible with older broker still does what you need > and there in not need to switch to the newer API. > > > -Matthi

Re: 2.5.0 Producer.sendOffsetsToTransaction() and Backwards Compatibility

ker first to 2.5, and then > client binaries. Is there any further concern that blocks you from getting > the broker side upgrade first before using the new API? > > Boyang > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:37 PM Gary Russell wrote: > > > Is there any way to determine the broker ver

2.5.0 Producer.sendOffsetsToTransaction() and Backwards Compatibility

Is there any way to determine the broker version in the kafka-clients? I need to determine whether I can use the new sendOffsetsToTransaction with ConsumerGroupMetadata or use the old one. If I use the new API with a 2.4.1 broker, I get UpsupportedVersionException: Attempted to write a non-defa

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-8195) Unstable Producer After Send Failure in Transaction

Gary Russell created KAFKA-8195: --- Summary: Unstable Producer After Send Failure in Transaction Key: KAFKA-8195 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8195 Project: Kafka Issue Type

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-3412) Multiple commitAsync() calls causes SendFailedException in commit callback

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15283583#comment-15283583 ] Gary Russell commented on KAFKA-3412: - Given that this is considered a Blocker,