community project and the vote is already
open. So let the community decide what is the way.
Thank you for your efforts to review this KIP.
De Gao
On 18 February 2025 18:14:27 GMT, Greg Harris
wrote:
>Hi De Gao,
>
>Thanks for your explanation. It sounds like this feature is appropriate in
&g
hese answer your concerns.
Thanks again for your review!
De Gao
On 16 February 2025 23:43:30 GMT, Greg Harris
wrote:
>Hi De Gao,
>
>Thanks for the KIP!
>
>I'd like to re-raise the concerns that David and Justine have made,
>especially the alternative of Tiered Storage and t
Hi All:
I would like to call for a vote for KIP-1114: Introducing Chunk in Partition
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1114%3A+Introducing+Chunk+in+Partition
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/g000qyyd6ljbs6poqrodb7cog8mswf6v
Thanks for all the reviews!
De
Hi All:
I have updated the KIP to be more specific on the motivation based on the
comments.Please review as you can. Appreciated.
If no more review to follow I will submit the KIP for vote.
Thank you!
On 3 January 2025 22:36:06 GMT, De Gao wrote:
>Thanks for the review.
>This is an inter
ion time/size.
>Currently, Kafka supports only the earliest-offset strategy during
>reassignment. And, this strategy will only work for topics
>with cleanup policy set to "delete".
>
>--
>Kamal
>
>On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 10:23 PM David Arthur wrote:
>
>>
ll be an enabler for many many smart ideas that will
make Kafka more flexible and more powerful.
Hope this answers your question.
Thanks again for your review!
On 2 January 2025 16:53:04 GMT, David Arthur wrote:
>Hey De Gao, thanks for the KIP!
>
>As you’re probably aware, a Partiti
ts of tier storage was that clusters
>don't have to replicate tiered data anymore. Could you perhaps extend the
>motivation of the KIP to include tier storage in the reflexion?
>
>Best,
>David
>
>On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:46 PM De Gao wrote:
>
>> Hi All:
>&g
ribute on that while waiting for reviews.
Regards
De Gao
On 11 December 2024 08:51:43 GMT, David Jacot
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Thanks for the KIP. The community is pretty busy with the Apache Kafka 4.0
>release so I suppose that no one really had the time to engage in reviewing
>the KIP yet.
Hi All:
There were no discussion in the past week. Just want to double check if I
missed anything?
What should be the expectations on KIP discussion?
Thank you!
De Gao
On 1 December 2024 19:36:37 GMT, De Gao wrote:
>Hi All:
>
>I would like to start the discussion of KIP-1114 In
Hi All:
I would like to start the discussion of KIP-1114 Introducing Chunk in Partition.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1114%3A+Introducing+Chunk+in+Partition
This KIP is complicated so I expect discussion will take longer time.
Thank you in advance.
De Gao
Hi:
I want to propose a KIP. Could somebody grant me permission to contribute?
Jira Id: gaode
Confluence Id: gaode
Thank you
De Gao
is not about fix the message loss. Will share when ready.
Thanks Andrew.
From: Andrew Grant
Sent: 21 November 2023 12:35
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: How Kafka handle partition leader change?
Hey De Gao,
Message loss or duplication can actually happen
I am asking this because I want to propose a change to Kafka. But looks like in
certain scenario it is very hard to not loss or duplication messages. Wonder in
what scenario we can accept that and where to draw the line?
From: De Gao
Sent: 21 November 2023 6:25
ntegration guarantee upon
metadata change?
From: Andrew Grant
Sent: 20 November 2023 12:26
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: How Kafka handle partition leader change?
Hey De Gao,
The controller is the one that always elects a new leader. When that hap
ynced between B1, B2, C, and Px that it is guaranteed that all the
parties acknowledged the leadership change in the right order? Was there a
break of produce flow in between? Any chance of message lost?
Thanks
De Gao
15 matches
Mail list logo
