Hi David: Thanks for the helping info. Appreciated. I believe the chunk is still needed in spite of tiered storage as this makes Kafka more 'complete'. Let me extend the motivation section. I wasn't aware we are busy on Kafka 4.0. If that's the case I will see if can contribute on that while waiting for reviews.
Regards De Gao On 11 December 2024 08:51:43 GMT, David Jacot <dja...@confluent.io.INVALID> wrote: >Hi, > >Thanks for the KIP. The community is pretty busy with the Apache Kafka 4.0 >release so I suppose that no one really had the time to engage in reviewing >the KIP yet. Sorry for this! > >I just read the motivation section. I think that it is an interesting idea. >However, I wonder if this is still needed now that we have tier storage in >place. One of the big selling points of tier storage was that clusters >don't have to replicate tiered data anymore. Could you perhaps extend the >motivation of the KIP to include tier storage in the reflexion? > >Best, >David > >On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 10:46 PM De Gao <d...@live.co.uk> wrote: > >> Hi All: >> >> There were no discussion in the past week. Just want to double check if I >> missed anything? >> What should be the expectations on KIP discussion? >> >> Thank you! >> >> De Gao >> >> On 1 December 2024 19:36:37 GMT, De Gao <d...@live.co.uk> wrote: >> >Hi All: >> > >> >I would like to start the discussion of KIP-1114 Introducing Chunk in >> Partition. >> > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1114%3A+Introducing+Chunk+in+Partition >> >This KIP is complicated so I expect discussion will take longer time. >> > >> >Thank you in advance. >> > >> >De Gao >>
