Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka PowerPC Daily » test-powerpc #377

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1161: cleanup.policy shouldn't be empty

Hello Jun, Thanks for the reply. JR42, JR45, JR46, JR47: I have updated the KIP. JR43: If bootstrap.servers is empty for these configurations, it will fail when creating the AdminClient. I have updated the KIP to reflect this behavior. JR44: Thanks for pointing this out. Kafka will indeed fa

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-19476) Improve state transition handling in SharePartition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Apoorv Mittal resolved KAFKA-19476. --- Fix Version/s: 4.2.0 Resolution: Fixed > Improve state transition handling in SharePa

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1161: cleanup.policy shouldn't be empty

Hi, Jiunn-Yang, Thanks for the reply. A few more comments. JR42. [6] [7] are not needed since currently an empty list already causes an exception. JR43. Could you document the current behavior when bootstrap.servers is empty in MirrorClientConfig and WorkerConfig? JR44. [12] seems incorrect. I

Re: [VOTE] 4.1.0 RC1

I chatted with Andrew Schofield. So, share is not required in group.coordinator.rebalance.protocols to enable share consumers. One just needs to set share.version. Thanks, Jun On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 6:09 AM Paolo Patierno wrote: > Hi Jun, > yes I think it's clearer now. Thanks. > > Paolo > > O

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1190: Add a metric for controller thread idleness

Thanks Mahsa, +1 (non-binding) from me as well. Best, Jonah On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 4:31 PM Kevin Wu wrote: > Hi Mahsa, > > Thanks for the KIP. > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Kevin Wu > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 3:17 PM Mahsa Seifikar > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I would like to start a

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-19572) Fix NPE messages in ConsoleShareConsumer.

Shivsundar R created KAFKA-19572: Summary: Fix NPE messages in ConsoleShareConsumer. Key: KAFKA-19572 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19572 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Sub-tas

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-19571) Race condition between log segment flush and file deletion causing log dir to go offline

Ilyas Toumlilt created KAFKA-19571: -- Summary: Race condition between log segment flush and file deletion causing log dir to go offline Key: KAFKA-19571 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19571

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-19570) Implement offline migration

Lucas Brutschy created KAFKA-19570: -- Summary: Implement offline migration Key: KAFKA-19570 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-19570 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Sub-task

Re: [VOTE] 4.1.0 RC1

Hi Jun, yes I think it's clearer now. Thanks. Paolo On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 22:31, Jun Rao wrote: > Hi, Paolo, > > Thanks for the context. Do you feel that the doc change addresses your > concern? > > Jun > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 5:13 AM Paolo Patierno > wrote: > > > Hi Jun, > > thanks ... t

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » 3.9 #214

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1201: Add disk threshold strategy to prevent disk full failure

In most use cases, Kafka serves as a messaging middleware where messages that have already been consumed are typically no longer needed and can be safely deleted. Therefore, I propose enhancing the threshold strategy with an automatic deletion feature: When a broker's disk usage reaches 95%, it sh

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1172: Improve EndToEndLatency tool

Hi Chia-Ping, chia02: Yes, separating the configs would make things clearer, but it also adds more arguments and complexity. Using a single file keeps it simpler. To help users, we could add clearer usage hints, e.g., this configuration file applies to producer, consumer, and admin. chia03: Good

Re: KIP-1141: Simplifying MetadataQuorumCommand by Leveraging Admin API for Controller Management

Hi Kuan-Po, > L03 > In KAFKA-19563, you mentioned introducing a new --add-controller-command-config option to separate admin and controller configs. That sounds like a solid approach. Yes, that can resolve the issue in KAFKA-19563, but it conflicts with the motivation in the KIP: 1. Limited Ac

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1172: Improve EndToEndLatency tool

hi Nick chia02: “ --command-config” is a bit awkward since this tool will create both producer and consumer. Should we separate the config? chia03: should we add “num-headers”, likes “num-records”? Best, Chia-Ping On 2025/06/10 14:15:08 Junwang Guo wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to st

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1160: Enable returning supported features from a specific broker

hi Poan chia_02: what happens if the specific node is nonexistent? Could you please add the case to the test plan? chia_03: we have another KIP that exposes the versions through metrics. Could you please expand the rejected alternatives section regarding the option of “using metrics”? Best,