Hi Chia-Ping,
chia02: Yes, separating the configs would make things clearer, but it also adds more arguments and complexity. Using a single file keeps it simpler. To help users, we could add clearer usage hints, e.g., this configuration file applies to producer, consumer, and admin. chia03: Good idea. Adding `--num-headers` (default: 1) would make testing more realistic since real messages often have multiple headers. I’ll add this to the KIP and the implementation. Regards, Nick On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 3:28 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> wrote: > hi Nick > > chia02: “ --command-config” is a bit awkward since this tool will create > both producer and consumer. Should we separate the config? > > chia03: should we add “num-headers”, likes “num-records”? > > Best, > Chia-Ping > > On 2025/06/10 14:15:08 Junwang Guo wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to start a discussion on a KIP to improve the > > `EndToEndLatency` tool. > > > > KIP Link: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Awu9F > > > > Thank you! > > > > Best regards, > > Nick Guo > > >
