Re: [VOTE] KIP-1064 - Upgrade slf4j to 2.x

> Colin McCabe 於 2024年9月15日 凌晨4:26 寫道： > I'm also not totally convinced that we need to provide so many logging > systems. It feels odd to bring in so many dependencies without having a clear > idea of who is using them. We didn't do this earlier and nobody complained. > Putting more stuff o

RE: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1022 Formatting and Updating Features

Hi everyone, I make some update to KIP-1022 < https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1022%3A+Formatting+and+Updating+Features > As part of KIP-584, brokers expose supported version ranges for features, which may include 0. Version 0 can indicate either an incomplete feature or a dis

Re: Contribution to RAT

Hi Claude, Well, as you said, there is no licensing issue, since they're both Apache :) I don't see why anyone in Apache Kafka would object to moving or duplicating this file to be within the RAT project. The place to ask is probably in the RAT project itself -- I don't know if this is somethin

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1086: Add ability to specify a custom produce request parser.

David and Colin, I was confused about the process of the discussion. I mistakenly thought since the conversation died out and either there was no interest or no active protests it was time to move to voting. Thank you both for your patience, explanations, and guidance. Hopefully once the next ve

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1073 Return inactive observer nodes in DescribeQuorum response

Hi Gantigmaa Selenge, I think we should have a boolean in the request like "includeFenced" which defaults to false. Then if we can't include the fenced brokers, we throw an UnsupportedVersionException and fall back to the old behavior. There are two main reasons for this: 1. if we don't do this

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1064 - Upgrade slf4j to 2.x

Hi Muralidhar, Thanks for working on this. Can you give some context here about whether slf4j 1 is still maintained? And what code changes are needed to move to slf4j2? The KIP says that "we also provide the compatible binding jars of a few backends like logback, log4j, reload4j, commons loggin

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1086: Add ability to specify a custom produce request parser.

Yes, I agree. I'm going to leave a -1 just for process reasons. Please let's continue the discussion. best, Colin On Fri, Sep 13, 2024, at 06:55, David Arthur wrote: > Max, > > First off, thanks for the KIP! Looking back at the discussion thread, I > don't feel like we reached consensus on this

Re: New release branch 3.9

Thanks, everyone. It looks like the blockers list is empty now. I am running some ducktape tests and if they look good, will create a release candidate for 3.9.0 soon. regards, Colin On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, at 10:01, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Hi Colin, > > we found another blocker bug: > https:/

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Jeff Kim

Congrats, Jeff! best, Colin On Sat, Sep 14, 2024, at 04:01, Igor Soarez wrote: > Congratulations Jeff! > > -- > Igor

Re: Build Updates for week of Sep 9, 2024

Thanks for working on this, David. best, Colin On Thu, Sep 12, 2024, at 11:16, David Arthur wrote: > A lot has been happening with the GitHub Actions build in the past few > weeks. I thought I would share some updates. > > *Build Statistics* > Now that we have all PRs builds running the test suit

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-17513) Move LogSegmentsTest to storage module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chia-Ping Tsai resolved KAFKA-17513. Fix Version/s: 4.0.0 Resolution: Fixed > Move LogSegmentsTest to storage module > -

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1082: Enable ID Generation for Clients over the ConsumerGroupHeartbeat RPC

Hello everyone, Since this KIP has been fully discussed, I will initiate a vote for it next Monday. Thank you and have a nice weekend. Best regards, TengYao TengYao Chi 於 2024年9月5日 週四 下午2:19寫道： > Hello everyone, > > KT2: It looks like everyone who has expressed an opinion supports the > second

Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #3303

See

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Jeff Kim

Congratulations Jeff! -- Igor