Jenkins build is still unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #3087

See

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-17071) SharePartition - Add more unit tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Abhinav Dixit resolved KAFKA-17071. --- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0 3.9.0 Resolution: Fixed > SharePartition - Ad

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1065: Add "retry" return-option to ProductionExceptionHandler

Thanks for the feedback! To answer your questions: In general, yes, user topics should exist, however, we support "dynamic routing" allowing users to extract an output topic name dynamically from the message content. A poison pill record could contain an invalid topic a name, and thus, it thi

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-17101) Mirror maker internal topics cleanup policy changes to 'delete' from 'compact'

kaushik srinivas created KAFKA-17101: Summary: Mirror maker internal topics cleanup policy changes to 'delete' from 'compact' Key: KAFKA-17101 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17101

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1059: Enable the Producer flush() method to clear the latest send() error

Hey, just catching up on the latest discussion, and I think we are going in circles? And maybe over-complicate things a little bit too much? My take on the KIP is a follows: - As a minimum, we want to solve client side RecordTooLargeException - If we can tackle other client side errors "f

Re: [PR] Update powered-by_adding SPITHA.html [kafka-site]

mjsax commented on PR #611: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/611#issuecomment-2215883170 @VictorParkM -- thanks for updating your webpage adding `®` to Apache Kafka. However, you should also have a disclaimer on the web page about it. > Apache®, Apache Kafka®, Kafka®, a

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #3086

See

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-17100) GlobalStreamThread#start should not busy-wait

Greg Harris created KAFKA-17100: --- Summary: GlobalStreamThread#start should not busy-wait Key: KAFKA-17100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17100 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Task

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1022 Formatting and Updating Features

Hi, Colin, Thanks for the update. Since the PR also introduces a new version of BrokerRegistrationRequest, could we include that change in the KIP update too? Jun On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 11:08 AM Colin McCabe wrote: > Hi all, > > I've updated the approach in https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-17099) Improve the process exception logs with the exact processor node where the exception occurs

Loïc Greffier created KAFKA-17099: - Summary: Improve the process exception logs with the exact processor node where the exception occurs Key: KAFKA-17099 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17099

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1067: Remove ReplicaVerificationTool in 4.0 (deprecate in 3.9)

I was only aware of the minor/major release rule and not the 1 year rule. Is this written down somewhere? I only see this text about a "reasonable period" in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Time+Based+Release+Plan I also see another example of deprecation in 3.7 and removal in 4.

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-17098) Error Opening RocksDBStore

Eduwer Camacaro created KAFKA-17098: --- Summary: Error Opening RocksDBStore Key: KAFKA-17098 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17098 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Bug Co

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1059: Enable the Producer flush() method to clear the latest send() error

Hey Chris Thanks for the comprehensive answer. I don’t believe that things were better/worse before/after the fix of X/Y. I strongly believe that things get better and better when we intend to improve our current solutions. I am happy that experts, including you, are so cautious and, at the sam

Re: [VOTE] KIP-877: Mechanism for plugins and connectors to register metrics

This will help eliminate some boilerplate code we have for our connectors. +1 (non-binding) From: dev@kafka.apache.org At: 06/25/24 04:30:27 UTC-4:00To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-877: Mechanism for plugins and connectors to register metrics Bumping this thread. Let me know

[VOTE]: KIP-1006: Remove SecurityManager Support

Hi all, I'd like to call a vote on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1006%3A+Remove+SecurityManager+Support Voting for this KIP would signal our intention to remove SecurityManager support in the future when the project's minimum supported version is Java 21. Thanks, Greg Ha

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-17097) Add replace.null.with.default configuration to ValueToKey and ReplaceField (KIP-1040)

Greg Harris created KAFKA-17097: --- Summary: Add replace.null.with.default configuration to ValueToKey and ReplaceField (KIP-1040) Key: KAFKA-17097 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17097 P

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-15838) [Connect] ExtractField and InsertField NULL Values are replaced by default value even in NULLABLE fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-15838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Greg Harris resolved KAFKA-15838. - Fix Version/s: 3.9.0 Resolution: Fixed The InsertField, ExtractField, HeaderFrom, Cast, S

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1032: Upgrade to Jakarta and JavaEE 9 in Kafka 4.0

Hi Chris, Please open a vote thread for this. Thanks, Greg On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:07 AM Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just wanted to bump this and see if anyone had more feedback before > trying to call a vote for this for 4.0? > > Chris > > On Mon, Apr 1,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1022 Formatting and Updating Features

Hi all, I've updated the approach in https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16421 so that we change the minVersion=0 to minVersion=1 in older ApiVersionsResponses. I hope we can get this in soon and unblock the features that are waiting for it! best, Colin On Wed, Jul 3, 2024, at 10:55, Jun Rao

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.9.0 release

Hi Federico, Thanks for the KIP. I've added it to the release plan. I hope we can get it in this week or next, since feature freeze is imminent. Colin On Sun, Jun 30, 2024, at 23:29, Federico Valeri wrote: > Hi Colin, is it possible to include this small KIP in the release plan? > > https://cw

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-17096) Fix kafka_log4j_appender.py

Chia-Ping Tsai created KAFKA-17096: -- Summary: Fix kafka_log4j_appender.py Key: KAFKA-17096 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17096 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Test

Re: [PR] add PARALLEL1 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #26: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/26 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

Re: [PR] add PARALLEL2 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #27: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/27 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

Re: [PR] add PARALLEL3 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #25: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/25 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

[PR] add PARALLEL2 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #27: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/27 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

[PR] add PARALLEL3 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #25: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/25 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

[PR] add PARALLEL1 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #26: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/26 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1020 Print git log in validate patch [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #24: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/24 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

[PR] ISSUE-1020 Print git log in validate patch [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #24: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/24 This will let us verify the merge group behavior. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1066: Mechanism to cordon brokers and log directories

Hi, Thanks for taking a look. - Yes you're right, I meant AlterPartitionReassignments. Fixed. - That's a good idea. I was expecting users to discover cordoned log directories by describing broker configurations. But being able to also get this information when describing log directories makes sen

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1015 Remove BATCH1 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #22: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/22 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

[PR] ISSUE-1017 Update BATCH1 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #23: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/23 This patch updates BATCH1 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comm

[PR] ISSUE-1015 Remove BATCH1 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #22: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/22 Remove the BATCH1 file -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment

[PR] ISSUE-1014 Should fail in the queue [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #21: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/21 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1014 add different sleeps to better simulate a build [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #20: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/20 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.8.0 release

Hi Dongjin, KIP-390 is part of the 3.8 release because the JIRA associated with it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7632 is closed as resolved, hence the KIP is declared done and ready. I did some digging, and I saw that Mickael was the one doing the PR that closed the JIRA ticket: htt

[PR] ISSUE-1014 add different sleeps to better simulate a build [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #20: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/20 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1012 This should hopefully fail [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #19: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/19 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

[PR] ISSUE-1012 This should hopefully fail [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #19: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/19 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-1059: Enable the Producer flush() method to clear the latest send() error

Hi Alieh, Can you clarify why broker-side errors shouldn't be covered? The only real rationale I can come up with is that it's easier to implement. "Things were better for Kafka Streams before KAFKA-9279 was fixed" isn't very convincing, because Kafka Streams is not the only user of the Java prod

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.8.0 release

Hi Josep, Thanks for managing the 3.8 release. I have a request: could you please move the KIP-390 into the 3.9 release? Here is the background: KIP-390 was adopted first but hasn't been released for a long time. After some time, I proposed KIP-780 with further improvements and also corrected an

Re: [PR] Dummy commit to test if non-committers can raise PR [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #15: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/15 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

[PR] Dummy commit 2 - for TESTING [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

ShivsundarR opened a new pull request, #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/18 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1010 add BATCH1 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/16 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1011 adding BATCH2 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #17: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/17 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

[PR] ISSUE-1010 add BATCH1 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/16 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

[PR] ISSUE-1011 adding BATCH2 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #17: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/17 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

[PR] Dummy commit to test if non-committers can raise PR [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

ShivsundarR opened a new pull request, #15: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/15 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1005 Rename the github workflows [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #14: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/14 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

[PR] ISSUE-1005 Rename the github workflows [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #14: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/14 Give them more accurate names -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1005 Make a failing change [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #13: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/13 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

[PR] ISSUE-1005 Make a failing change [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #13: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/13 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

[PR] ISSUE-1004 Rename queue job to validate-patch [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #12: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/12 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsu

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1004 Rename queue job to validate-patch [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #12: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/12 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1003 Add a failing change [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #11: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/11 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

[PR] ISSUE-1003 Add a failing change [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #11: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/11 This should hopefully not be able to merge -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1002 Fix workflow file [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #10: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/10 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@k

[PR] ISSUE-1002 Fix workflow file [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #10: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/10 Hopefully this fixes the workflow -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the speci

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1001 A change that will pass the PR, but fail the merge queue [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #9: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/9 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kaf

[PR] ISSUE-1001 A change that will pass the PR, but fail the merge queue [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #9: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/9 This patch should not get merged. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specif

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1000 Add separate script for merge queue [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah commented on PR #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/8#issuecomment-2214141469 This PR failed the PR build, but was able to merge via the Queue since the merge queue job passed -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

Re: [PR] ISSUE-1000 Add separate script for merge queue [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/8 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kaf

[PR] ISSUE-1000 Add separate script for merge queue [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah opened a new pull request, #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/8 This patch adds a new `queue-check.sh` script to let us simulate PRs that pass the PR validation, but fail the queue validation. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi

Re: [PR] Test 4 [kafka-merge-queue-sandbox]

mumrah merged PR #7: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-merge-queue-sandbox/pull/7 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@kaf

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-17095) Fix the typo: CreateableTopicConfig -> CreatableTopicConfig

Chia-Ping Tsai created KAFKA-17095: -- Summary: Fix the typo: CreateableTopicConfig -> CreatableTopicConfig Key: KAFKA-17095 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17095 Project: Kafka

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1067: Remove ReplicaVerificationTool in 4.0 (deprecate in 3.9)

> > Note that we already have this tracker for tools deprecations, but I'm > fine to have a dedicated one for this tool (maybe we can link them). > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14705. happy to know it. I have added the link to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17073 Fede

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.8.0 release

Hi Bruno, I'd be in for merging the fix into 3.8. Given the solution is already found and it seems easy enough to reason and with very limited scope, I believe it is fairly safe to merge this one. Let's work towards merging the fix and see if the system tests improve and await for your soak testin

Re: [VOTE] KIP-1067: Remove ReplicaVerificationTool in 4.0 (deprecate in 3.9)

+1 Note that we already have this tracker for tools deprecations, but I'm fine to have a dedicated one for this tool (maybe we can link them). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-14705. On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 3:58 PM Chia-Ping Tsai wrote: > > +1 > > Dongjin Lee 於 2024年7月7日 週日 下午9:22寫道：

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-17084) Network Degrade Test fails in System Tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-17084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luke Chen resolved KAFKA-17084. --- Fix Version/s: 3.8.0 Resolution: Not A Problem > Network Degrade Test fails in System Tests >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.8.0 release

Hi Josep, we found a bug in Streams. The bug is in the state updater that we enabled by default for 3.8. I have already created a fix for it: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/16545 As you can see the fix is small and limited to a location in the code, so I do not think that it is risky