Re: [kafka-clients] Re: [DISCUSS] Before you Vote for Apache Kafka RCs, Watch This!

Thanks for the feedback David. I really appreciate it. I would work on eliminating some items in the docker container that are not needed and making this as a base image that already has those dependencies pre-baked. That could significantly trim the elapsed time between when they fire up the con

Jenkins build is unstable: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #495

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-775: Custom partitioners in foreign key joins

Hi Victoria, Earlier in the thread, I proposed rolling `Function foreignKeyExtractor` and `Materialized>` into TableJoined as well. From that perspective, I partially agree with John's latest alternative, but I think we should still retain the `leftJoin`, `join`, and `outerJoin` methods on the KTa

Re: [DISCUSS] Before you Vote for Apache Kafka RCs, Watch This!

Hi Israel, Thank you for this initiative. The tool seems pretty cool and I think that it could be useful as well. I haven't tried it yet though. I just watched the video and I found the part which requires to build the docker container really long, perhaps even longer than the validation itself

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 3.1.0 release

Hi all, I just published a release plan here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+3.1.0 The plan suggests the following dates: KIP Freeze: 15 October 2021 Feature Freeze: 29 October 2021 Code Freeze: 12 November 2021 At least two weeks of stabilization will follow Cod

Re: [DISCUSS] Before you Vote for Apache Kafka RCs, Watch This!

Hello Everyone, Please take a moment to review this and share your thoughts. It would be great to have more community involvement during release candidate validations I am wondering if this should be split up between the site docs repo and the core code repo or just in the code repo Should we in

Build failed in Jenkins: Kafka » Kafka Branch Builder » trunk #494

See Changes: -- [...truncated 493348 lines...] [2021-09-24T10:41:29.625Z] [2021-09-24T10:41:29.625Z] MetadataRequestBetweenDifferentIbpTest > testUnknownTopicId() STARTED

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-13322) Java client produces a large amount of garbage during a poll

Michail created KAFKA-13322: --- Summary: Java client produces a large amount of garbage during a poll Key: KAFKA-13322 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13322 Project: Kafka Issue Typ

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-13102) Topic IDs not propagated to metadata cache quickly enough for Fetch path

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-13102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jacot resolved KAFKA-13102. - Fix Version/s: 3.1.0 Reviewer: David Jacot Resolution: Fixed > Topic IDs not pro

Allowing both IPv4 and IPv6 connections on the same port

Hello everyone, I wanted to ask if anyone has any thoughts/objections regarding Kafka allowing multiple listeners of the same port as long as one is IPv4 and the other is IPv6, i.e. listeners=PLAINTEXT://127.0.0.1:9092,PLAINTEXTV6://[::1]:9092 listener.security.protocol.map=PLAINTEXT:PLAINTEXT,PL