Jenkins build is back to normal : kafka-trunk-jdk11 #1635

See

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10267) [Documentation] | Correction in kafka-console-producer command

Hemant Girase created KAFKA-10267: - Summary: [Documentation] | Correction in kafka-console-producer command Key: KAFKA-10267 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10267 Project: Kafka

Jenkins build is back to normal : kafka-trunk-jdk8 #4708

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-616: Rename implicit Serdes instances in kafka-streams-scala

Ok, I mentioned adding missing serdes in the Proposed Change paragraph. About VoidSerde. I didn't add it intentionally. The semantic of the Unit (scala's void) type is not clear in terms of the data. If kafka topic contains messages of type Unit, what does it actually means? That there is always n

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-2.6-jdk8 #77

See Changes: [wangguoz] KAFKA-10263: Do not assign standby for revoking stateless tasks (#9005) -- [...truncated 3.15 MB...] org.apache.kafka.streams.test.ConsumerRecordFac

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk14 #284

See Changes: [github] KAFKA-10263: Do not assign standby for revoking stateless tasks (#9005) -- [...truncated 3.19 MB...] org.apache.kafka.streams.TopologyTestDriverTest

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-631: The Quorum-based Kafka Controller

Hello Colin, Thanks for the nice written KIP. A few meta comments: 1) We need to talk a bit about broker failure detection: is that piggy backed with fencing? i.e. should the controller immediately migrate leader partitions from the fenced brokers? On one side, when a broker is fenced it cannot t

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.0 release

Randall, we found another blocker: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10262 Luckily, we have already a PR for it. -Matthias On 7/8/20 3:05 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > Hey Randall, > > We just discovered another regression in 2.6: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10

Re: [VOTE] KIP-623: Add "internal-topics" option to streams application reset tool

Thanks for the update! On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 3:18 PM Joel Wee wrote: > Thanks all for voting! > > I am closing the vote as accepted with three binding +1 votes (Boyang, > Guozhang, John). > > Thanks John for the suggestion. I think that makes sense. I have updated > the KIP to say that only top

Re: [VOTE] KIP-620 Deprecate ConsumerConfig#addDeserializerToConfig(Properties, Deserializer, Deserializer) and ProducerConfig#addSerializerToConfig(Properties, Serializer, Serializer)

Thanks for the update. One nit for the KIP is to format the signature indentation for all code templates, like: public static Properties addSerializerToConfig(Properties properties, Serializer keySerializer, Serializer valueSerializer) Other than that, +1 (binding) from me. On Fri, Jul 10, 202

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10266) Fix connector configs in docs to mention the correct default value inherited from worker configs

Konstantine Karantasis created KAFKA-10266: -- Summary: Fix connector configs in docs to mention the correct default value inherited from worker configs Key: KAFKA-10266 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-431: Support of printing additional ConsumerRecord fields in DefaultMessageFormatter

Hi all The vote for KIP-431 has passed with 3 binding and 1 non-binding +1s, and no objections. Thanks everyone for reviews and feedback. Regards, Badai On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 5:22 PM Badai Aqrandista wrote: > > Hu > > I would make it more readable and move the key next to the value like this

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-405: Kafka Tiered Storage

Hi all, Thanks for the KIP. I took a look and one thing that stood out to me is that the more metadata we have, the more storage we will need on local disk for the rocksDB database. This seems like it contradicts some of the goals of the project. Ideally the space we need on local disk shoul

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-450: Sliding Windows

Thanks Leah and Sophie for the KIP. 1. I'm a bit surprised that we don't have an advance time. Could we elaborate how the storage layer is structured? 2. IIUC, there will be extra cost in terms of fetching aggregation results, since we couldn't pre-aggregate until the user asks for it. Would be g

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-2.6-jdk8 #76

See Changes: [vvcephei] KAFKA-10191 fix flaky StreamsOptimizedTest (#8913) -- [...truncated 3.15 MB...] org.apache.kafka.streams.TopologyTestDriverTest > shouldCreateStateDi

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-450: Sliding Windows

Hey Matthias, Thanks for pointing that out. I added the following to the Propose Changes section of the KIP: "Records that come out of order will be processed the same way as in-order records, as long as they fall within the grace period. Any new windows created by the late record will still be c

[GitHub] [kafka-site] vvcephei merged pull request #274: MINOR: Add vvcephei to KEYS

vvcephei merged pull request #274: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/274 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go t

[GitHub] [kafka-site] vvcephei opened a new pull request #274: MINOR: Add vvcephei to KEYS

vvcephei opened a new pull request #274: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/274 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above t

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-450: Sliding Windows

Thanks Leah! This kind of assumes an implicit answer to Matthias's question, but I was wondering if we should take this opportunity to choose a better default value for the grace period. Note that the default of -1 in the TimeWindows class, for example, ultimately gets translated into a default va

Re: [VOTE] KIP-554: Add Broker-side SCRAM Config API

Hey Colin, thanks for the KIP. One question I have about AlterScramUsers RPC is whether we could consolidate the deletion list and alteration list, since in response we only have a single list of results. The further benefit is to reduce unintentional duplicate entries for both deletion and alterat

Re: [VOTE] KIP-620 Deprecate ConsumerConfig#addDeserializerToConfig(Properties, Deserializer, Deserializer) and ProducerConfig#addSerializerToConfig(Properties, Serializer, Serializer)

> I don't think my question gets answered, Sorry for incorrect response :( > why would deprecating the map > based `addSerializerToConfig` break user's recompilation? If you worry > about warnings, we could refactor out the content and create a > package-private `attachSerializersToConfig` or so

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-616: Rename implicit Serdes instances in kafka-streams-scala

Thanks Yuriy! What about `VoidSerde` ? It's not listed. It might also be nice to add a short sentence and state that in addition to fixing the name collisions, the KIP will also close the gap of out-of-the-box serdes and add missing Serdes that are offered in Java to Scala. -Matthias On 7/10/2

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-10265) FetchRequest and FetchResponse should use the generated message classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Arthur resolved KAFKA-10265. -- Resolution: Duplicate > FetchRequest and FetchResponse should use the generated message classe

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-10265) FetchRequest and FetchResponse should use the generated message classes

David Arthur created KAFKA-10265: Summary: FetchRequest and FetchResponse should use the generated message classes Key: KAFKA-10265 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10265 Project: Kafk

Re: [VOTE] KIP-554: Add Broker-side SCRAM Config API

+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP, Colin! Regards, Rajini On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:49 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote for KIP-554: Add a broker-side SCRAM configuration > API. The KIP is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ihERCQ > > The previous discussio

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-616: Rename implicit Serdes instances in kafka-streams-scala

Oh, ok. I have done that. Just didn't know that it was necessary. -Yuriy On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:30 PM John Roesler wrote: > Ah, thanks Yuriy, > > Sorry if this wasn't clear, but _all_ public API changes have to > be explicitly included in the KIP. Can you just enumerate all > the contents of

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-616: Rename implicit Serdes instances in kafka-streams-scala

Ah, thanks Yuriy, Sorry if this wasn't clear, but _all_ public API changes have to be explicitly included in the KIP. Can you just enumerate all the contents of the new API? Thanks, John On Fri, Jul 10, 2020, at 04:54, Yuriy Badalyantc wrote: > Hi, Matthias, > > It's not directly mentioned in t

Re: [VOTE] KIP-621: Deprecate and replace DescribeLogDirsResult.all() and .values()

Thanks Dongjin, I was hoping to close the vote, but was waiting till we had consensus around the points you raised on the discussion thread. On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:39 PM Dongjin Lee wrote: > +1. (non-binding) > > As of present, it has 3 bindings (Colin, Manikumar, and Mickael) and 2 > non-bin

Re: [VOTE] KIP-621: Deprecate and replace DescribeLogDirsResult.all() and .values()

+1. (non-binding) As of present, it has 3 bindings (Colin, Manikumar, and Mickael) and 2 non-bindings (David, Dongjin). Since it has 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes, this KIP is accepted. Thanks everyone for the votes. On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:19 PM Mickael Maison wr

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-621: Deprecate and replace DescribeLogDirsResult.all() and .values()

Hi Tom and Colin, I see. Thanks for the comprehensive explanation. I learned a lot. Although my approach includes a new member field `DescribeLogDirsResult.LogDirInfo.tpToReplicaInfos` to keep binary compatibility, but anyway, you are right - it does not worth except small consistency gain. Best

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk11 #1634

See Changes: [github] KAFKA-10249: don't try to read un-checkpointed offsets of in-memory -- [...truncated 1.91 MB...] kafka.api.GroupAuthorizerIntegrationTest > testAu

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-631: The Quorum-based Kafka Controller

I was thinking that we might need something like multi-operation record in zookeeper to atomically create topic and partition records when this multi record is committed. This way metadata will have both the TopicRecord and PartitionRecord toge

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-616: Rename implicit Serdes instances in kafka-streams-scala

Hi, Matthias, It's not directly mentioned in the KIP, but I added all missing Java serdes. I mentioned it in the pull request description: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8955 And also, this KIP originally was based on a pull request where I added missing java serdes :) https://github.com/ap

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-431: Support of printing additional ConsumerRecord fields in DefaultMessageFormatter

Hu I would make it more readable and move the key next to the value like this: CreateTime:1592475472398|Partition:3|Offset:0|Headers:h1=v1,h2=v2|key1|value1 What do you think? In future KIP, we'll add some formatting like David Jacot suggested. Regards Badai On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:57 PM hu