Fwd: Warning from dev@kafka.apache.org

...why do I get this mail? -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 10:25 AM Subject: Warning from dev@kafka.apache.org To: Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the dev@kafka.apache.org mailing list. I'm working for my owner, who can be reached at dev-ow.

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk11 #761

See Changes: [cmccabe] KAFKA-8601: Add UniformStickyPartitioner and tests (#7199) -- [...truncated 2.59 MB...] org.apache.kafka.streams.scala.kstream.ProducedTest > Create

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk8 #3858

See Changes: [manikumar] KAFKA-8600: Use RPC generation for DescribeDelegationTokens protocol [wangguoz] KAFKA-8802: ConcurrentSkipListMap shows performance regression in cache

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk11 #760

See Changes: [manikumar] KAFKA-8600: Use RPC generation for DescribeDelegationTokens protocol [wangguoz] KAFKA-8802: ConcurrentSkipListMap shows performance regression in cache [cmccabe] MINOR: Remove Deprecat

Jenkins build is back to normal : kafka-2.3-jdk8 #90

See

Re: [VOTE] KIP-504 - Add new Java Authorizer Interface

+1 (binding) Thanks, Rajini! best, Colin On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, at 09:52, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to start the vote for KIP-504: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-504+-+Add+new+Java+Authorizer+Interface > > This KIP replaces the Scala Authorizer AP

Jenkins build is back to normal : kafka-trunk-jdk11 #759

See

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-482: The Kafka Protocol should Support Optional Fields

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, at 10:01, Jason Gustafson wrote: > > Right, I was planning on doing exactly that for all the auto-generated > > RPCs. For the manual RPCs, it would be a lot of work. It’s probably a > > better use of time to convert the manual ones to auto gen first (with the > > possible exce

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-482: The Kafka Protocol should Support Optional Fields

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, at 11:19, David Jacot wrote: > Hi Colin, > > Thank you for the KIP! Things are well explained!. It is huge improvement > for the Kafka protocol. I have few comments on the proposal: > > 1. The interleaved tag/length header sounds like a great optimisation as it > would be sh

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-504 - Add new Java Authorizer Interface

Hi Don, That should be fine. I guess Ranger loads policies from the database synchronously when the authorizer is configured, similar to SimpleAclAuthorizer loading from ZooKeeper. Ranger can continue to load synchronously from `configure()` or `start()` and return an empty map from `start()`. Tha

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-504 - Add new Java Authorizer Interface

Hi Rajini Assuming this doesn't affect custom plugins, I don't have any concerns regarding this. I do have one question regarding: "For authorizers that don’t store metadata in ZooKeeper, ensure that authorizer metadata for each listener is available before starting up the listener. This ena

[VOTE] KIP-504 - Add new Java Authorizer Interface

Hi all, I would like to start the vote for KIP-504: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-504+-+Add+new+Java+Authorizer+Interface This KIP replaces the Scala Authorizer API with a new Java API similar to other pluggable APIs in the broker and addresses known limitations in the exi

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-8810) Add mechanism to detect topology mismatch between streams instances

Vinoth Chandar created KAFKA-8810: - Summary: Add mechanism to detect topology mismatch between streams instances Key: KAFKA-8810 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8810 Project: Kafka

Re: Requesting Contribution Access

Hi Hanumanth, You'll need to create an account on Apache Jira first, then give us your username on this mailing list. Thanks, Bill On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:14 AM bandi soft wrote: > Hi Kafka Dev Team, > > I am very new to open source contributions,and I am really interested to > work on some

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk11 #758

See Changes: [cmccabe] MINOR: Fix bugs in handling zero-length ImplicitLinkedHashCollections -- [...truncated 6.28 MB...] org.apache.kafka.streams.state.internals.InMemor

Requesting Contribution Access

Hi Kafka Dev Team, I am very new to open source contributions,and I am really interested to work on some of the kafka features. Can you please provide me contributor permissions. Thanks, Hanumanth.

[DISCUSS] KIP-508: Make Suppression State Queriable

Hi all, I would like to start a discussion of KIP-508, making suppression state queriable. Please give it a read when you are free and give some feedbacks. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-508%3A+Make+Suppression+State+Queriable Thanks, Dongjin -- *Dongjin Lee* *A hitchhi

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-504 - Add new Java Authorizer Interface

Hi all, I made another change to the KIP. The KIP was originally proposing to extend SimpleAclAuthorizer to also implement the new API (in addition to the existing API). But since we use the new API when available, this can break custom authorizers that extend this class and override specific meth

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-8809) Infinite retry if secure cluster tried to be reached from non-secure consumer

Gabor Somogyi created KAFKA-8809: Summary: Infinite retry if secure cluster tried to be reached from non-secure consumer Key: KAFKA-8809 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8809 Project:

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk8 #3857

See Changes: [rajinisivaram] KAFKA-8592; Fix for resolving variables for dynamic config as per -- [...truncated 2.59 MB...] org.apache.kafka.connect.json.JsonConverterTe

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-8808) Kafka Inconsistent Retention Period across partitions

Prashant created KAFKA-8808: --- Summary: Kafka Inconsistent Retention Period across partitions Key: KAFKA-8808 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8808 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Bug

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-trunk-jdk8 #3856

See Changes: [jason] MINOR: Use max retries for consumer group tests to avoid flakiness [cmccabe] MINOR: Fix bugs in handling zero-length ImplicitLinkedHashCollections --

Re: [VOTE] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient

Closing this vote as we are well over 72 hours :) The vote has passed with +6 binding votes (Guozhang, Vahid, Bill, Harsha, Colin and Jason) and +7 non binding votes (Gabor, Jungtaek, Ryanne, Andrew, Eno, Edo and Patrik). Thanks to everyone that reviewed and helped improve this proposal. On Thu,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-496: Administrative API to delete consumer offsets

+1 (non binding) Thanks! On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:53 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019, at 11:47, Jason Gustafson wrote: > > Hey Colin, I think deleting all offsets is equivalent to deleting the > > group, which can be done with the `deleteConsumerGroups` api. I debated > > whethe

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-504 - Add new Java Authorizer Interface

Thanks Colin. If there are no other concerns, I will start vote later today. Many thanks to every one for the feedback. Regards, Rajini On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:57 PM Colin McCabe wrote: > Thanks, Rajini. It looks good to me. > > best, > Colin > > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019, at 11:37, Rajini

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-8592) Broker Dynamic Configuration fails to resolve variables as per KIP-421

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajini Sivaram resolved KAFKA-8592. --- Resolution: Fixed > Broker Dynamic Configuration fails to resolve variables as per KIP-421 >