+1 (non binding)
Thanks!
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:53 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019, at 11:47, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > Hey Colin, I think deleting all offsets is equivalent to deleting the
> > group, which can be done with the `deleteConsumerGroups` api. I debated
> > whether there should be a way to delete partitions for all unsubscribed
> > topics, but I decided to start with a simple API.
>
> That's a fair point-- deleting the group covers the main use-case for 
> deleting all offsets.  So we might as well keep it simple for now.
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
> >
> > I'm going to close this vote. The final result is +3 with myself, Guozhang,
> > and Colin voting.
> >
> > -Jason
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:21 AM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jason,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > >
> > > Is there ever a desire to delete all the offsets for a given group?
> > > Should the protocol and tools support this?
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > best,
> > > Colin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, at 10:57, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > > > +1 (binding).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Jason!
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:18 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-496:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-496%3A+Administrative+API+to+delete+consumer+offsets
> > > > > .
> > > > > +1
> > > > > from me of course.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jason
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -- Guozhang
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to