GitHub user manjuapu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/86
MINOR:Updating Rabobank description and Zalando image in powered-by &
streams page
@guozhangwang @dguy Updated text was provided by Rabobank, so in this PR I
am updating it.
Please review.
GitHub user mmolimar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3960
KAFKA-5975: No response when deleting topics and delete.topic.enable=false
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mmolimar/kafka KAFKA
Mario Molina created KAFKA-5975:
---
Summary: No response when deleting topics and
delete.topic.enable=false
Key: KAFKA-5975
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5975
Project: Kafka
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Apurva Mehta resolved KAFKA-5865.
-
Resolution: Fixed
This is fixed in 1.0.0 by the changes in
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3
Matthias J. Sax created KAFKA-5974:
--
Summary: Removed unused parameter in public interface
Key: KAFKA-5974
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5974
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ismael Juma resolved KAFKA-5960.
Resolution: Fixed
> Producer uses unsupported ProduceRequest version against older brokers
> ---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3944
---
Tom Crayford created KAFKA-5973:
---
Summary: ShutdownableThread catching errors can lead to partial
hard to diagnose broker failure
Key: KAFKA-5973
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5973
Pr
GitHub user rhauch opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3959
KAFKA-5901 Added Connect metrics specific to source tasks
Added Connect metrics specific to source tasks. This PR is built on top of
#3911, and when that is merged this can be rebased and merged.
Yo
Tomas Zuklys created KAFKA-5972:
---
Summary: Flatten SMT does not work with null values
Key: KAFKA-5972
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5972
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
GitHub user cmccabe opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3958
Re-enable KafkaAdminClientTest#testHandleTimeout
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/cmccabe/kafka
re-enable-KafkaAdminClientTest.t
Igor Canadi created KAFKA-5971:
--
Summary: Broker keeps running even though not registered in ZK
Key: KAFKA-5971
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5971
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: B
Hi Ismael,
On 25 September 2017 at 17:51, Ismael Juma wrote:
> We don't have this policy today for what it's worth.
>
Thanks for the clarification. On re-reading I realise I misinterpreted
Guozhang Wang's suggestion when 1.0.0 was first mooted:
> Just to clarify, my proposal is that moving fo
Hi Mickael,
Thanks for the reply.
Thanks for the KIP. Is this meant to superseed KIP-170 ?
> If so, one of our key requirements was to be able to access the
> topics/partitions list from the policy, so an administrator could
> enforce a partition limit for example.
>
It's not meant to replace KI
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Hi Ewen,
>
> I understand your point of view and ideally we'd have one convention
> for handling all user provided strings. This KIP reused the
> sanitization mechanism we had in place for user principals.
>
> I think both ways have pros an
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Tom Bentley wrote:
> > bq. If this KIP is accepted for Kafka 1.1.0 this removal could happen in
> > Kafka 3.0.0
> >
> > There would be no Kafka 2.0 ?
> >
>
> As I understand it, a deprecation has to exist for a complete major version
> number cycle before the feat
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the KIP. Is this meant to superseed KIP-170 ?
If so, one of our key requirements was to be able to access the
topics/partitions list from the policy, so an administrator could
enforce a partition limit for example.
Also instead of simply having the Java Principal object, could
bq. deprecations that are added in 1.x (x>0) have to remain in all 2.y
Makes sense.
It is fine to exclude KIP-113 from your KIP.
Thanks
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Tom Bentley wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> bq. topic.action.policy.class.name
> >
> > Since the policy wo
Hi Ted,
Thanks for the feedback!
bq. topic.action.policy.class.name
>
> Since the policy would cover more than one action, how about using actions
> for the second word ?
>
Good point, done.
> For TopicState interface, the abstract modifier for its methods are not
> needed.
>
Fixed.
bq. KIP-
bq. topic.action.policy.class.name
Since the policy would cover more than one action, how about using actions
for the second word ?
For TopicState interface, the abstract modifier for its methods are not
needed.
bq. KIP-113
Mind adding more to the above bullet ?
bq. If this KIP is accepted for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Damian Guy resolved KAFKA-5489.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Closing this as i haven't seen it fail in a while and i'm unable to repro
Github user vahidhashemian closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3438
---
The vote has passed with 5++. We are now closing the vote.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:18 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> If no on else has opinions or votes on this thread, Richard could you close
> the voting phase then?
>
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KI
GitHub user omkreddy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3957
MIROR: Reject JoinGroup request from first member with empty
partition.assignment.strategy
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/omk
Hi all,
If there are no further concerns, I will start a VOTE thread for this
minor KIP.
Thanks
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Manikumar
wrote:
> Thanks for the reviews.
>
> @Ted
> Updated the KIP.
>
> @Tom
> I think we can interpret usernames as locale independent strings. I am
> planning
GitHub user rajinisivaram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3956
KAFKA-5970: Avoid locking group in operations that lock DelayedProduce
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rajinisivaram/kafka
Rajini Sivaram created KAFKA-5970:
-
Summary: Deadlock due to locking of DelayedProduce and group
Key: KAFKA-5970
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5970
Project: Kafka
Issue Typ
Hi Ewen,
I understand your point of view and ideally we'd have one convention
for handling all user provided strings. This KIP reused the
sanitization mechanism we had in place for user principals.
I think both ways have pros and cons but what I like about early
sanitization (as is currently) is
Hi,
I'd like to start a discussion for KIP-201. The basic point is that new
AdminClient APIs for modifying topics should have a configurable policy to
allow the administrator to veto the modifications. Just adding a
ModifyTopicPolicy would make for awkwardness by having separate policies
for creat
GitHub user scholzj opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3955
KAFKA-5969: Use correct error message when the JSON file is invalid
When invalid JSON file is passed to the
bin/kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh / PreferredReplicaLeaderElectionCommand
tool it g
Jakub Scholz created KAFKA-5969:
---
Summary: bin/kafka-preferred-replica-election.sh gives misleading
error when invalid JSON file is passed as parameter
Key: KAFKA-5969
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFK
Rajini Sivaram created KAFKA-5968:
-
Summary: Remove all broker metrics during shutdown
Key: KAFKA-5968
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5968
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
Github user rajinisivaram closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2165
---
If no on else has opinions or votes on this thread, Richard could you close
the voting phase then?
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding).
>
> On 19 Sep 2017 12:27 am, "Richard Yu" wrote:
>
> > Hello, I would like to start a VOTE thread on KIP-202
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3949
---
GitHub user ijuma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3954
KAFKA-5758: Don't fail fetch request if replica is no longer a follower for
a partition
We log a warning instead, which is what we also do if the partition hasn't
been created
yet.
You can merge
36 matches
Mail list logo
