Hi Jay,
I spent some more time over this today and went back to the original
thread which brought up the issue with file leaks [1]. I think that
output of lsof in that logs has a very important hint:
/home/work/data/soft/kafka-0.8/data/_oakbay_v2_search_topic_ypgsearch_yellowpageV2-0/
That makes sense, thanks!
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> But I think the flaw in trying to guess what kind of serializer they will
> use is when we get it wrong. Basically let's say we guess "String". Say 30%
> of the time we will be right and we will save the two configurat
But I think the flaw in trying to guess what kind of serializer they will
use is when we get it wrong. Basically let's say we guess "String". Say 30%
of the time we will be right and we will save the two configuration lines.
70% of the time we will be wrong and the user gets a super cryptic
ClassCa
Maybe. I think the StringSerialzer could look more like a typical type of
message. Instead of encoding being a property it would be more typically
just written in the bytes.
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Jay Kreps wrote:
> I don't think so--see if you buy my explanation. We previously defau
The failure really means that the filesystem is configured incorrectly
(from the link). In such circumstances it is best to fail and let the
operations/admins know instead of working around it.
On 1/24/15 9:42 AM, "Jay Kreps" wrote:
>Hey guys,
>
>Jaikiran posted a patch on KAFKA-1853 to improve
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30078/#review69547
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sriharsha Chintalapani
On Jan. 24, 2015, 11:
Hey guys,
Jaikiran posted a patch on KAFKA-1853 to improve the handling of failures
during delete.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1853
The core problem here is that we are doing File.rename() as part of the
delete sequence which returns false if the rename failed. Or file delete
sequ
> On Jan. 24, 2015, 7:05 a.m., Manikumar Reddy O wrote:
> > Can you update the README.md document
Sure. I just did and have updated this patch.
- Jaikiran
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14290565#comment-14290565
]
jaikiran pai commented on KAFKA-1885:
-
Updated reviewboard https://reviews.apache.org/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
jaikiran pai updated KAFKA-1885:
Attachment: KAFKA-1885_2015-01-24_17:21:59.patch
> Allow test methods in "core" to be individually r
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30078/
---
(Updated Jan. 24, 2015, 11:52 a.m.)
Review request for kafka.
Bugs: KAFKA-188
11 matches
Mail list logo