[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
rajendram kathees updated KAFKA-1666:
-
Remaining Estimate: 48h (was: 24h)
Original Estimate: 48h (was: 24h)
> Issue for se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14160041#comment-14160041
]
rajendram kathees commented on KAFKA-1666:
--
Reason for this issue is that produce
HI Jay and Jun,
Thanks for you quick support and patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12673049/KAFKA-1673.patch.
I will apply this patch tomorrow and try. On the side note, is there any
way to skip metric collection all together ?
Thanks,
Bhavesh
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:00
Ah, gotcha, yeah, I couldn't figure that out. I see the the trouble now--if
you are currently blocked that doesn't contribute to the metic. That makes
sense.
-Jay
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Sorry, that's my bad. The intention was that in case the producer blocks
> there fo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26355/#review55482
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jay Kreps
On Oct. 6, 2014, 2:44 a.m., Jun Ra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159830#comment-14159830
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-1305:
Thinking about this a bit more. As a short term fix, I th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159817#comment-14159817
]
Matthew Sandoz commented on KAFKA-1672:
---
ugh I should have considered this. i did an
Sorry, that's my bad. The intention was that in case the producer blocks
there forever (because memory never frees up for some reason), having a
timeout will allow us to get a more accurate stat on the waitTime sensor.
Filed and patched kafka-1673. Could you take a look?
Thanks,
Jun
On Sun, Oct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159814#comment-14159814
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-1673:
Created reviewboard https://reviews.apache.org/r/26355/di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao updated KAFKA-1673:
---
Attachment: KAFKA-1673.patch
> potential java.lang.IllegalStateException in BufferPool.allocate()
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao updated KAFKA-1673:
---
Assignee: Jun Rao
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> potential java.lang.IllegalStateException in B
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26355/
---
Review request for kafka.
Bugs: KAFKA-1673
https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
Jun Rao created KAFKA-1673:
--
Summary: potential java.lang.IllegalStateException in
BufferPool.allocate()
Key: KAFKA-1673
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1673
Project: Kafka
Issue
Hi Kafka Dev Team,
*java.lang.*
*IllegalStateException: Cannot send after the producer is closed.*
The above seems to bug. If the ProducerRecord is in flight within send
method is execute and another thread seems to shutdown in the middle of
flight will get error.
Thanks,
Bhavesh
On Sun, Oct
Hi Jay,
Thanks for this. We do not want exact stats from the producer. If it is
off by some we are ok with it we do not want producer to be blocked. So is
there any was to add flag say metric.inconsistent=true would not wait for
300 ms.
We really need Async Producer other we will have to wrap
Hi Kafka Dev Team,
The use case is that we need to know producer state in background Threads
and so we can submit the message.
This seems to a bug in trunk code. I have notice that KafkaProducer itself
does not have close state and inflight message will encounter following
issues. Should I file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159801#comment-14159801
]
Joe Stein commented on KAFKA-1672:
--
What do you get trying to connect to your zookeeper s
Matthew Sandoz created KAFKA-1672:
-
Summary: zk timeouts with examples from 8.1.1.1
Key: KAFKA-1672
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1672
Project: Kafka
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159768#comment-14159768
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-1669:
Thanks for the patch. A 30 secs backoff time will probabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159766#comment-14159766
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-234:
---
The reasoning is the following. A ZK follower can be up to z
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jun Rao updated KAFKA-1667:
---
Labels: newbie (was: )
> topic-level configuration not validated
>
In 0.8.x, a topic doesn't necessarily get created on every broker. Each
topic can have one or more partitions. Each partition can have one or more
replicas. In general, the replicas are spread over the brokers in a
cluster. The producer obtains the metadata of a topic to determine which
broker to s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159758#comment-14159758
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-1644:
Alexey,
My only concern of the patch is that it gives pe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159755#comment-14159755
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-1664:
Perhaps we can add a wrapper in ZkUtils for creating a pa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159752#comment-14159752
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-1663:
Neha,
Since this is a blocker for 0.8.2, could you push
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159749#comment-14159749
]
Jun Rao commented on KAFKA-1670:
The default value in LogConfig is just for unit test (so
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26346/#review55479
---
Thanks for the patch. Some comments below.
core/src/main/scala/kaf
Maybe this was introduced in
dcc88408c98a07cb9a816ab55cd81e55f1d2217d
as part of KAFKA-1488.
We seem to add a hard coded 300 ms timeout on the wait time. After this 300
ms timeout the thread is allowed to allocate memory to itself irrespective
of whether it is next in line. This is not right at
HI Kafka Dev,
I would like to request state check state so I can manage the Life Cycle
of Producer better. I you guys agree I will file Jira request. I just
give state of producer can be I would like mange or start (create new
instance of producer) or restart or close based on state. I just
Hi Kafka Dev team,
I am getting following exception occasionally, and data is lost due to this
exception.What could cause this error ? We have prod release coming up
with New Kafka API end of this week. So I any help is greatly appreciated.
* java.lang.IllegalStateException: Wrong condition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manikumar Reddy updated KAFKA-1668:
---
Assignee: Manikumar Reddy
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> TopicCommand doesn't wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manikumar Reddy updated KAFKA-1668:
---
Attachment: KAFKA-1668.patch
> TopicCommand doesn't warn if --topic argument doesn't match any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14159471#comment-14159471
]
Manikumar Reddy commented on KAFKA-1668:
Created reviewboard https://reviews.apach
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26351/
---
Review request for kafka.
Bugs: KAFKA-1668
https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
34 matches
Mail list logo