Hi Aleksandr.
Thank you for your effort, it looks interesting. I have a few
comments/questions on some little details.
1. About the paragraph named 'Versioning'. Could you please elaborate
what is the difference between 'API version' and 'specification
version'? Both might have 'breaking changes'
Oops, sent it too early :) I'll proceed.
... As a side note, as far as I know, there were some discussions
about using automatic dependency injection in Ignite 3 (as the whole
system), but no decision was made.
3. In the table in the API section, there is this phrase: 'Update node
configuration w
I got it. What do you think about this proposal:
- “ignite” prints help
- “ignite shell” enters REPL
Or
- “ignite” prints help
- “ignite-shell” enters REPL and it is a separate application
I prefer the first varian but I would like to hear opinions of other community
members.
> On 19
From my perspective we should move towards existing UX approaches. For
example:
python - enters shell
python --help - prints help
python -c - executes command
What about other CLI tools that works with remote services? I can't
remember properly but do AWS, openshift or maybe GCP CLIs also supp
[Note: You're receiving this because you are subscribed to one or more
Apache Software Foundation project mailing lists.]
This is your final reminder that the Call for Presetations for
ApacheCon North America 2022 will close at 00:01 GMT on Monday, May
23rd, 2022. Please don't wait! Get your talk
Hi, Eduard
Thank you for pointing out the 140 symbol column limit.
Il’l follow this.
As for transitive dependencies, good point. I would mention
that not only class loader magic can be implemented but
Micronaut libraries could be shadowed in order not to
cause the jar-hell issues for clients.
Hello, Aleksandr!
I agree with the usage of Swagger for generating REST API specifications as
it, for example, removes the burden of manually keeping the documentation
up to date. However, why do we need the Micronaut framework? No other
modules use it, and it brings a lot of dependencies that you
Hi, Alexander
Micronaut is chosen as a lightweight framework that
is is compatible with swagger generators. One who
develops an endpoint just writes a regular micronaut
annotations and gets specification generated from it.
I get your concerns about additional library, but
micronaut itself i
Hi Roman,
Thanks for the note. I’ve updated ‘Versioning’ paragraph
with the example.
> On 19 May 2022, at 10:12, Roman Puchkovskiy
> wrote:
>
> Hi Aleksandr.
>
> Thank you for your effort, it looks interesting. I have a few
> comments/questions on some little details.
>
> 1. About the parag
Yes, micronaut injection is going to be used but
only for controllers. The border is MicronautFactory
(see RestComponent constructor in the example).
This factory declares beans that are needed for
controllers. Each module declares its own factory.
List of factories are put to RestComponent
manua
Agreed. Thank you for comments, Roman.
> On 19 May 2022, at 10:17, Roman Puchkovskiy
> wrote:
>
> 3. In the table in the API section, there is this phrase: 'Update node
> configuration with a given body.'. I suggest replacing 'Update' with
> 'Patch' because 'update' could mean a full replacemen
Andrey,
> different connections on different client instances theoretically
> could generate an already existing connection ID
Do you mean an UUID collision?
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 1:09 AM Andrey Gura wrote:
> Igor,
>
> Thanks for the proposal.
>
> I understand that such a situation is almost
Igor,
I've started working on the initial sessions implementation [1],
and I'd like to clarify the procedure of logical connection restore.
> client in its turn tries to establish a new *node connection*
> and restore *logical connection *using ConnectionRestoreReq
This implies either an additio
Andrey,
1. If a server generates a UUID that already exists it can check and just
re-generate it straight away
as a check is just a simple map lookup.
2. Well, yes. This proposal does not consider monitoring, but with current
approach it will be definitely
easier to implement it properly.
Pavel,
Hello!
Can you arrange that?
Regards,
--
Ilya Kasnacheev
чт, 19 мая 2022 г. в 09:20, Maxim Muzafarov :
> Ilya,
>
> Should we start a formal vote about the ignite-schedule deletion?
>
> On Mon, 16 May 2022 at 14:28, Ilya Kasnacheev
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > In my opinion, the ignite-sch
15 matches
Mail list logo
